Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

His goal per game ratio is good (really good) at 0.6 goals per game. I think only the likes of Aguero in the PL can prob beat that. But the fact that he misses so many games his goal rate for LFC with respect to the amount of games he could have played is 0.3 goals per game...............Thats not worth €150K a week if thats what he is on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin
1 hour ago, ThomThomDrum said:

His goal per game ratio is good (really good) at 0.6 goals per game. I think only the likes of Aguero in the PL can prob beat that. But the fact that he misses so many games his goal rate for LFC with respect to the amount of games he could have played is 0.3 goals per game...............Thats not worth €150K a week if thats what he is on

Aguero has the same problem to some extent. He also spends more time out injured than most players.

And Liverpool could replace Sturridge and get all the same problems from the replacement, as well.

Without knowing if there's any underlying medical issue the only right choice is to keep him and hope he's less injured in future, as it#s not the case that injuries in the past mean the same amount of injuries in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, eFestivals said:

 

And Liverpool could replace Sturridge and get all the same problems from the replacement, as well.

 

Of course they could, but its all got to do with probability and risk assessment (and potentially personality analysis if the club really wants to get into it). The probability of a new player being a sick note is far less than DS continuing to be a sick note so less risky, so if you persist with DS you need to decouple that risk somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
15 minutes ago, ThomThomDrum said:

Of course they could, but its all got to do with probability and risk assessment (and potentially personality analysis if the club really wants to get into it). The probability of a new player being a sick note is far less than DS continuing to be a sick note so less risky, so if you persist with DS you need to decouple that risk somehow.

but even sicknote being as bad a sicknote in future is less than it was in the past - unless there's something already known medically.

I do get where you're coming from. How long can the club wait for a player?

But I think, in this case, he's just too good a player to risk gifting another team when he might never get injured again for all we know.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

but even sicknote being as bad a sicknote in future is less than it was in the past - unless there's something already known medically.

I do get where you're coming from. How long can the club wait for a player?

But I think, in this case, he's just too good a player to risk gifting another team when he might never get injured again for all we know.

 

Indeed. But you also have to take into account the effect all these injuries have cumulatively on a player. Core stuff aswell which is a worry. Hips, groins, thighs, hamstrings etc. You never really recover from them.

Feel bad for him. Just hope he doesn't turn into another Hargreaves but Sturridge has basically been injured for 3 years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, The Nal said:

Big Sam has them playing! Villa and Newcastle in dire trouble.

I keep looking at their team and thinking they're too good to go down, but they're just so fucking bad.

Villa, Bournemouth and Norwich/Newcastle, for me. Hopefully Newcastle stay up because I'd like to get to some games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ThomThomDrum said:

That video of him in the casino a few months ago didn't paint a nice picture of him.... That's why I suppose. Seems like filth to me

Fair enough. I haven't seen the video so can't comment, but assumed it wasn't too bad considering he only got a fine when those others Leicester players got sacked.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dan R said:

Fair enough. I haven't seen the video so can't comment, but assumed it wasn't too bad considering he only got a fine when those others Leicester players got sacked.

 

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/6581386/England-ace-Jamie-Vardy-in-racism-storm.html

Have a look for yourself so. 

Its very much something I wouldnt personally class as "not too bad". Proper degenerate stuff really

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I got in for £11.25 in the end, which was absolutely ridiculously good value, and made the queues and overselling of the venue much more tolerable! Sniping in on other people’s unwanted tickets on the day of an event might become my new hobby I think 🥳
    • Ann and Nancy Wilson are planning a final world tour for HEART starting next year. They were never at Glastonbury. They should do it. 
    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
    • Definitely. UKIP also used Merkel welcoming 1 million Afgans to Europe in 2015 during the brexit vote.   Politicians in other countries within the EU know the are going to lose voters to parties to the right of them over stuff like this and they've no control over it.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...