Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2013-2014


Guest kaosmark2

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin

PMSL!!! Why didn't he buy him from Ajax at the time then?

that same question can be posed at every manager.

The point is, Wenger went in big for him - over double the amount of money he'd ever paid for a player.

It was an easier spot than most, but it was still a good spot. Better than the other 'big' managers managed by not trying at the release clause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wenger going in for Suarez smacked of desperation more than anything. He went for a big name. And massively undervalued him too. Suarez was one of the best players in the world when he went for him. And hes better now.

There are plankton waving about in the current at the bottom of the Ionian Sea bed who know Suarez is a cracking player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that same question can be posed at every manager.

The point is, Wenger went in big for him - over double the amount of money he'd ever paid for a player.

It was an easier spot than most, but it was still a good spot. Better than the other 'big' managers managed by not trying at the release clause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wenger going in for Suarez smacked of desperation more than anything. He went for a big name. And massively undervalued him too. Suarez was one of the best players in the world when he went for him. And hes better now.

There are plankton waving about in the current at the bottom of the Ionian Sea bed who know Suarez is a cracking player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Wenger going in for Suarez smacked of desperation more than anything. He went for a big name. And massively undervalued him too.

Hmmmm ..... Fabregas. :P

Suarez was one of the best players in the world when he went for him. And hes better now.

It wasn't recognised as such. If it was, there'd have been none of that "Liverpool don't have a hope of 4th" that came from just about every direction.

There are plankton waving about in the current at the bottom of the Ionian Sea bed who know Suarez is a cracking player.

everyone knows it now, yes.

The fact that TGT posted those words in September gets to show how new that idea is.

People knew he was good, but not THAT good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

The only reason others didn't come in for him is that Suarez is a bit of a twat on the pitch (or was) nothing to do with only Wenger seeing how good he could be/is.

Yeah, so top managers would still knock him back now on the same basis, then? :P

He was massively under-appreciated. You can see it in words in this thread.

I didn't start watching Liverpool this season until after Suarez had destroyed Norwich again, because I preferred to watch Arsenal for the better footballing spectacle!

Absolutely no one thought he'd hit the level he has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Is he better than a year ago? Seems to be just playing in a better side than a year ago.

Only difference is he seems to be channeling his energy to help his team, rather than the self destruct button.

I'd say his stats say much better - top Prem scorer (and a record from open play), and top Prem assists.

But he's playing in a better side, yeah. Sterling, Coutinho, Allen & Henderson have all grown loads as players, Flanagan is better at LB than anyone else they've used there recently, etc, etc.

They're just feckin' rampant, aren't they? :lol:

I can remember someone posting here at the end of the 'invincibles' season "are Arsenal really that special?" and me and some others saying 'yes'. If Liverpool win it this year that'll be the next best I've seen by a long chalk, I reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet Fergie took a gamble on a few talented twats with issues and it was very much to the benefit of Utd and won them many a title. Cantona being the most obvious example

Good managers see the talent, use it and try their best to control the "issues". Wenger obviously did not have the balls to spend big and gamble on Suarez as he has "baggage". He obviously is not confident in his man management skills with problem players, or the money men at Arsenal dont trust such skills in him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Wenger obviously did not have the balls to spend big and gamble on Suarez as he has "baggage". He obviously is not confident in his man management skills with problem players, or the money men at Arsenal dont trust such skills in him.

I'd say it's just Wenger's general reluctance to spend.

But, he probably does feel more comfortable having spent that sort of money on Ozil, for the man management side. Wenger does German comfortably, so they're immediately in the same place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say his stats say much better - top Prem scorer (and a record from open play), and top Prem assists.

But he's playing in a better side, yeah. Sterling, Coutinho, Allen & Henderson have all grown loads as players, Flanagan is better at LB than anyone else they've used there recently, etc, etc.

They're just feckin' rampant, aren't they? :lol:

I can remember someone posting here at the end of the 'invincibles' season "are Arsenal really that special?" and me and some others saying 'yes'. If Liverpool win it this year that'll be the next best I've seen by a long chalk, I reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I guess it depends how your defining a special team. I would add the tevez/Ronaldo era man u team.

yep, it's all about what floats your boat - tho the record-breaking of Arsenal, and this Liverpool team (if they go 14 unbeaten to take the title), sets them apart from the merely great I'd say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With hindsight TGT has some quality posts about LFC/Suarez from early on in this thread.

To his credit he doesnt couch opinion with "maybes" - just says it. Sure he'd be the first to say he's been surprised by LFC this year. Who hasnt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find the Cardiff/palace incident more funny than anything. It looks like palace have been a bit cheeky, but its not like palace need much help to beat Cardiff.

Interesting on the radio discussing the Hull v Arsenal game, Hull are more likely to qualify for Europe next year if they lose the game. Its not the biggest incentive!

Also has anyone come across bubble games? Wrexham are playing chester this weekend and away fans are only allowed in if they go via club transport from the ground. To me this is OTT, let fans chose how they want to get to a football match and if they break the law, then arrest them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find the Cardiff/palace incident more funny than anything. It looks like palace have been a bit cheeky, but its not like palace need much help to beat Cardiff.

Interesting on the radio discussing the Hull v Arsenal game, Hull are more likely to qualify for Europe next year if they lose the game. Its not the biggest incentive!

Also has anyone come across bubble games? Wrexham are playing chester this weekend and away fans are only allowed in if they go via club transport from the ground. To me this is OTT, let fans chose how they want to get to a football match and if they break the law, then arrest them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Wasn't just me who thought it was either oversold or inadequately setup for the event then? For Pride, over the weekend, where there's also acts in the large blue marquee that was to the right of the "arena" (for want of a better term), it's probably much better as people are dispersed more. Thought the band were great, as was Nick, though he was clearly struggling with his voice at times.
    • I got in for £11.25 in the end, which was absolutely ridiculously good value, and made the queues and overselling of the venue much more tolerable! Sniping in on other people’s unwanted tickets on the day of an event might become my new hobby I think 🥳
    • Ann and Nancy Wilson are planning a final world tour for HEART starting next year. They were never at Glastonbury. They should do it. 
    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...