Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2013-2014


Guest kaosmark2

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Moyes hates divers and cheats - he's been big on it since Dunce, Gascoigne and Ginola (and more recently Fellaini which culminated in that headbutt last year - where Moyes asked for Fellainin to be retrospectively banned and that started Fellaini saying he wanted away from Everton - ironic he's still with Moyes)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So anyway, Liverpool have the most lethal striker of last season in Suarez (most goals per game), and the hottest striker currently in Sturridge (17 in 20 games, a better average than Suarez got last season).

Anyone else think they'll have trouble scoring goals this season? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So anyway, Liverpool have the most lethal striker of last season in Suarez (most goals per game), and the hottest striker currently in Sturridge (17 in 20 games, a better average than Suarez got last season).

Anyone else think they'll have trouble scoring goals this season? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

A team that has scored 5 in 4 games, with almost all of them being scrappy goals?

You can find stats about scoring records to suggest whatever you like. I don't think the problems will be as bad as a couple of years ago, but neither do I think they've suddenly turned into a team that have no difficulty with it.

Mostly, I was taking the piss out of TGT's post from yesterday. :P

But yep, Sturridge's goals have been scrappy so far, tho he's been injured and there's also new players to get used to. He won't keep scoring at the rate he's been doing so far, but all the same the signs are very good for him to be one of the bigger scorers in the Prem this season.

Liverpool were the 4th top-scorers over the whole of last season, a season that started with them being labelled the sort of deadline day disasters which has gone Utd's way this year - because they'd stupidly left themselves with just the one striker from Sept til January.

I don't see them as the strongest team in the league but they've also had a backline upgrade since last season, and that combined with the better front line since January should see them in the mix for the top 4 this season (which they weren't last season).

(just to be clear, by 'in the mix' I don't mean they'll definitely get in the top 4, but they won't be well short of being in the top 4 as they were last season).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Liverpool will be in the mix for top 4, I don't think they'll get it though, Man U (and possibly Spurs depending on gel speed) aside, all the other teams look stronger than last season, and I don't think Liverpool have improved enough to catch any of them up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we'll get 4th. But it took 9 games to get 10 points last season so things are a little better. Good point last night considering Agger, Johnson and Suarez were out and Coutinho got injured midway. Key players for us so bodes well really.

Edited by strummer77
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all very interesting as most of the top sides are still missing something to go to the next level.

I'm convinced Chelsea won't win the league with that strike force, united still missing a play maker, arsenal strike force is light, spurs will need this season to gel and will Liverpool continue the 2 DM'S when Suarez comes back.

City should be walking it really but motivation and no doubt a desire to do well in the champions league may be there problem.

So very open this season and hopefully sides will attack more for the viewer. Seems teams are very defensive to me this season, do teams play with 2 strikers anymore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question i'd ask is, Will Suarez return disrupt Sturridge, there is absolute no doubting that Sturridge is in fantastic form, but Suarez is THE key player for Liverpool, will he take well to having the attenton taken off him? Having to play in a 4-4-2 or 4-3-3?

Either way, again totally unbias, whilst Liverpool have been truly wonderful in first halfs this season, they have been woeful in the second half, i believe a more callous team infront of goal, will stick them to the slaughter defensively.

Either way, that's a COULD, and if you ask a United fan would they take 10 points from 4 games they'd bite your hand off, and considering 70pts could get you a CL place in most of the last 10 seasons, it's 14% of the way there with 34 games to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After Man U's performance tonight I'm starting to revise my opinion about them as title contenders. Obviously you can't predict a season off one game, but I've not seen them control a game that completely against decent opposition in a long while. Yes, their first goal shouldn't have counted, yes Leverkusen scored twice, but with Fellaini and Kagawa on the pitch they looked a top team, and Rooney was unplayable. I haven't seen him go past players and take people on like that in years.

I've still got my doubts about how much Moyes can get out of Cleverley/Evans/Young/etc. but that game showed very positive signs for the club. Damn it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I've still got my doubts about how much Moyes can get out of Cleverley

Like Fergie did, Moyes won't get much and he knows it.

With Felleni in the squad, Cleverley is now a bit-part player - which is all he ever should have been anyway.

I caught the last 20 minutes of the match last night and there was some wonderful play from Utd ... but against a clearly tiring side, and Utd still managed to concede a goal. I'm not sure that too much can be read from that game.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...