Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

WWE


lharris92

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

One of the best recent Ppvs in my view. I enjoyed both hell in the cell matches and del Rio was one of the best mystery opponents I can remember. The other matches were also solid. I think Rollins heel psychology was better than recent Ppvs.

Only criticism is that the pink ropes (great cause, but wrong occasion) didn't go well with hell in the cell theme and my usual moan of too much kicking out of finishes. 

Still not sure where they are heading for wrestlemania though. I assume the main event will be Brock v someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

One of the best recent Ppvs in my view. I enjoyed both hell in the cell matches and del Rio was one of the best mystery opponents I can remember. The other matches were also solid. I think Rollins heel psychology was better than recent Ppvs.

Only criticism is that the pink ropes (great cause, but wrong occasion) didn't go well with hell in the cell theme and my usual moan of too much kicking out of finishes. 

Still not sure where they are heading for wrestlemania though. I assume the main event will be Brock v someone.

Brock has used up all of his dates for this year so unless he's challenging as the Royal Rumble winner there wont be any  'mania main event build up for a while. My money is on a Sheild/Roman v Reigns main event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm expecting them to pull the trigger on Reigns at Survivor Series and have him take the title from Rollins. Surely they realise that having him win the Rumble again and trying to rehash last years push will go down even worse than it did originally. I'd like to see Seth be screwed out of winning the Rumble for whatever reason by The Authority, turning him face and him going one on one with Triple H at WM32, but at the same time I still think that The Rock vs. Triple H will probably happen. 

God knows what they have planned going forward! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brock has used up all of his dates for this year so unless he's challenging as the Royal Rumble winner there wont be any  'mania main event build up for a while. My money is on a Sheild/Roman v Reigns main event.

Do you mean Rollins v reigns or shield triple threat? I'm not sure any have the drawing power to headline a 100k plus venue. I'm sure that one of rock, taker, cena or Brock will be in the main event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean Rollins v reigns or shield triple threat? I'm not sure any have the drawing power to headline a 100k plus venue. I'm sure that one of rock, taker, cena or Brock will be in the main event.

Either or.

I'm sure they will do the same thing of past years and have a bunch of big matches which will feature the likes of Cena, 'taker & co then label them all main events but for the actual main event of the championship I can only see them going with Shield as thats the only thing they have produced in the last few years that has really caught on and they need to start building the new guys as real superstars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either or.

I'm sure they will do the same thing of past years and have a bunch of big matches which will feature the likes of Cena, 'taker & co then label them all main events but for the actual main event of the championship I can only see them going with Shield as thats the only thing they have produced in the last few years that has really caught on and they need to start building the new guys as real superstars.

To me the main event is the last match on the card, if the world title match is a shield triple threat match, it won't be last on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hes been booked really badly to be fair. Kane is the only real rivalry hes had I think? Hes has matches and a bit of back and forth with Cena but apart from that its been fairly stale.

Combination of booking and the wrestler in my view. I have found his character a little confusing. I'm not sure what he stands for and why I should hate him. Often the character built up on tv and the man who wrestles the Ppvs don't seem to have gelled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me the main event is the last match on the card, if the world title match is a shield triple threat match, it won't be last on.

Why wont it?

 

Seth is easy to get, he's a sell out. Betrayed his "brothers" to be part of the Authority to enrich his career which happened with him winning the title which and if they actually follow it on he'll lose to the "brother" he both betrayed and ruin their own chance for the title. The problem has been they haven't done much with between winning the title and (what will probably happen) losing it to Reigns,

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why wont it

 

Rollins is the world champion who gets bumped down to secondary main event when Brock wrestles, reigns was the chosen one who they had second thoughts about, ambrose has generally been booked the level below. Wrestlemania is the mainstream Ppv and will have one of the more mainstream headliners in the main event. I'm still thinking a final undertaker match closes the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they keep the belt on Rollins for the remainder of the year. The inevitable HHH-Rollins feud will likely come after mania in my opinion. If they really plan on making Reigns the next face of the company, then they'll likely want to capitalize on the opportunity of having the "future" win his first title in front of the biggest Wrestlemania crowd ever. I think they'll save Lesnar for headlining Wrestlemania 33 in Minnesota. 

As far as the Undertaker goes, I hope I'm wrong about this but I see them throwing him into a match with Braun Strowman. Book Strowman strong over the next few months and have Undertaker play the role as underdog.

As for Sting? Who knows if he'll even have the chance to wrestle again, which is a shame considering how they booked him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rollins is the world champion who gets bumped down to secondary main event when Brock wrestles, reigns was the chosen one who they had second thoughts about, ambrose has generally been booked the level below. Wrestlemania is the mainstream Ppv and will have one of the more mainstream headliners in the main event. I'm still thinking a final undertaker match closes the show.

This is the same company that had Miz headlining 'mania...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Combination of booking and the wrestler in my view. I have found his character a little confusing. I'm not sure what he stands for and why I should hate him. Often the character built up on tv and the man who wrestles the Ppvs don't seem to have gelled.

I agree yeah. He can be funny and dorky but then an ultimate heel.

 

As for Sting? Who knows if he'll even have the chance to wrestle again, which is a shame considering how they booked him.

Hes said that losing to HHH was "the right thing to do" in his (Stings) last match so it obviously wasn't a multi match contract that he signed and has since been restructured.

Sting for SS and to turn on Taker for a WM match? Seems after RAW last night that Kane is one of the four on team Taker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hes said that losing to HHH was "the right thing to do" in his (Stings) last match so it obviously wasn't a multi match contract that he signed and has since been restructured.

Sting for SS and to turn on Taker for a WM match? Seems after RAW last night that Kane is one of the four on team Taker.

Yeah I saw that interview but still feel like they should have allowed him at least one WWE singles win.

Kane is definitely on team Taker. Given the severity of Sting's injury though, I don't know if we'll get ever get that dream match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He headlined with an established star. I have no doubts a shield member could also headline (and they did this year) against one of the established stars. I just don't think they would trust the combination could draw.

Reigns and Rollins are established...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...