Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Films


Rufus Gwertigan

Recommended Posts

Ugh. These super serious superhero films are such a fucking drag, do these people know why people like superheroes? Because they're fun!

Christopher Reeve Superman, Adam West Batman, Lynda Carter Wonder Woman, absolute magic. Even without the fact that they were making a balls up of Superman, Man Of Steel was just a bad film. DC think they can copy the Marvel model by just cramming all their heroes into one film, but Marvel's films are all a tonne of fun, which is why they're so successful. Who gave a shit about Iron Man, Thor or Captain America before 2008? Now look at them, we're getting big budget Guardians of the Galaxy and Big Hero 6 film adaptations fer christsakes! DC need to ditch the silly seriousness and make something fun and colourful, The Lego Movie had a far better grasp on the appeal of their characters than they do. All you neckbeards that enjoy grim and gritty superhero films, grow the fuck up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh. These super serious superhero films are such a fucking drag, do these people know why people like superheroes? Because they're fun!

Christopher Reeve Superman, Adam West Batman, Lynda Carter Wonder Woman, absolute magic. Even without the fact that they were making a balls up of Superman, Man Of Steel was just a bad film. DC think they can copy the Marvel model by just cramming all their heroes into one film, but Marvel's films are all a tonne of fun, which is why they're so successful. Who gave a shit about Iron Man, Thor or Captain America before 2008? Now look at them, we're getting big budget Guardians of the Galaxy and Big Hero 6 film adaptations fer christsakes! DC need to ditch the silly seriousness and make something fun and colourful, The Lego Movie had a far better grasp on the appeal of their characters than they do. All you neckbeards that enjoy grim and gritty superhero films, grow the fuck up.

Nolan's serious superhero movies brought the genre back to life and made it profitable again. Now they're just trying to make a buck out of it, which is fairplay, that's what this sort of movie is about.

Not all Marvel movies are fun anyway. The Amazing Spider-Man isn't.

Edited by dentalplan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nolan's serious superhero movies brought the genre back to life and made it profitable again. Now they're just trying to make a buck out of it, which is fairplay, that's what this sort of movie is about.

Not all Marvel movies are fun anyway. The Amazing Spider-Man isn't.

I think they are talking about just the Avengers films that are made by Marvel and not the ones they sold off like SpiderMan, Blade and X-Men. It's also worth remembering the film that kicked off the superhero flicks was X-Men which I wouldn't really call fun.

The last Nolan movie was an embarrassment for all concerned. From start to finish.

I can't rewatch it as it's too much effort but I still rate Bane & Catwoman as great in it, the rest of it is very meh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technically not Marvel, its Sony Pictures :P

I think they are talking about just the Avengers films that are made by Marvel and not the ones they sold off like SpiderMan, Blade and X-Men. It's also worth remembering the film that kicked off the superhero flicks was X-Men which I wouldn't really call fun.

Ah okay. I'm admittedly not that wise about the genre. I thought the more recent mega success of TDK and TDKR ushered in the age of the relentless superhero movies rather than the X-Men films in the early to mid 00's.

Edited by dentalplan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they are talking about just the Avengers films that are made by Marvel and not the ones they sold off like SpiderMan, Blade and X-Men. It's also worth remembering the film that kicked off the superhero flicks was X-Men which I wouldn't really call fun.

That helped bring superhero films into the mainstream because of the cinematic element of it, the high stakes and (for its time) modern look, but let's not pretend it wasn't a tonne of fun. It took itself seriously, but it had Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen completely chewing the scenery all the way through and it took ample opportunities to geek out and have fun with the fact that this was the X-Men on the big screen, they throw out intentionally corny one-liners all the way through. The cartoonish tone of the first two X movies (and Matthew Vaughn's First Class is infinitely more over-the-top that those) is worlds away from the Nolan films.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still rate Catwoman as great in it,

Wtf?

I don't. At all. She's completely irrelevant to the whole film, the whole plot. The relationship between her and Batman seems forced for the sake of a romance and cheesy ending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anybody see that episode of The Trip where they spend about 10 minutes doing impressions of Bane and Batman and taking the piss? Series 2 of The Trip was nowhere near as good as the first, but that sequence had me properly in stitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That helped bring superhero films into the mainstream because of the cinematic element of it, the high stakes and (for its time) modern look, but let's not pretend it wasn't a tonne of fun. It took itself seriously, but it had Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen completely chewing the scenery all the way through and it took ample opportunities to geek out and have fun with the fact that this was the X-Men on the big screen, they throw out intentionally corny one-liners all the way through. The cartoonish tone of the first two X movies (and Matthew Vaughn's First Class is infinitely more over-the-top that those) is worlds away from the Nolan films.

Yes, but The X-Men, like most comic superheroes, was always camper than The Dark Knight. It's not just that Nolan randomly decided to make Batman dark and brooding, that adaptation had already happened in the comics and right or wrong fans adored it.

Not all Marvel movies are fun anyway. The Amazing Spider-Man isn't.

The Amazing Spider-Man films are the good Spider-Man films, but tonally it's much darker than the comics than spawned it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but The X-Men, like most comic superheroes, was always camper than The Dark Knight. It's not just that Nolan randomly decided to make Batman dark and brooding, that adaptation had already happened in the comics and right or wrong fans adored it.

I reckon Tim Burton is way closer to Frank Miller than Nolan. The world of The Dark Knight is gaudy and off-the-wall, it's very cartoony, and Batman is a total lunatic, Nolan plays it all very straight and insists on trying to make it all as real-world as possible. It's probably closest to Year One if anything. The X-Men have had many dark turns, anything you find in Batman comics, you can probably find somewhere in X-Men. I'm not even knocking Nolan's Batman, it was alright for a three film series, it's the new series trying to ape the style that I'm not happy with. Man Of Steel was a totally horrible film, no redeeming features at all, and they're carrying that on and bringing WW down with them.

In other film news, The Cornerhouse in Manchester is doing a Studio Ghibli season, I started clearing space in my diary, but I've just noticed that they're showing the Japanese language films with English subtitles. That makes me nothappy, the quality of most modern dubs on Ghibli films are very good, the hardcore fans that will only watch subtitled films are just blowhards that want to keep their niche as inaccessible as possible to the mainstream. No matter what excuses they throw out about it being "distracting" that the dialogue doesn't match the mouths 100%, or has been forced to fit the film, or missed the original meaning, none of this is as awkward of trying to focus on one of the most magnificent spectacles of animation, while also trying to keep up with the subtitles. It's a clunky and labourious way of experiencing the film, a bad dub may sometimes take you out of the film, subtitles will always take you out of the film. So I'm not going, the dickhead Japanophiles can sit among themselves and congratulate each other about how they're all proper fans, the tossers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watch A Clockwork Orange for the first time the other day. Unbelievable film, Malcolm McDowell's performance as Alex is inspiring.

one of my all time faves right there.

it gets better after repeated watchings.

viddy well little brother, viddy well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...