Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2011-2012


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

Yakubu was a personality thing I think in the end, Johnson was sold for profit to fund Yakubu, not for any other reasons. Saha was always injured (as he always has been) bar those 3, I can't really think of any others, all have been a success in part, just need one to stay fit and sane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    1469

  • The Nal

    1095

  • kaosmark2

    1095

  • strummer77

    896

  • Admin

Yakubu was a personality thing I think in the end, Johnson was sold for profit to fund Yakubu, not for any other reasons. Saha was always injured (as he always has been) bar those 3, I can't really think of any others, all have been a success in part, just need one to stay fit and sane.

Didn't you have Frannie Jeffers at some point too?

I might be mistaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Pat rice retiring after 44 years service at arsenal.

That's not new news, it's been known to be happening for a year or more.

His knees are fucked and he needs a good sit down. :lol:

According to the papers Tony Adams has been sniffing around after the job, but has been squarely told to fuck off. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think Moyes bought him back in on loan for 1/2 a season or so, not sure if you can use that on his success with Strikers.

Beattie is another that I forgot about that didn't work, Jo was another, he was alrightish for a bit but his heart was never in it.

Marcus Bent turned out well, he binned him off pretty sharpish, I think the fella from Leeds (who did OK himself) was just bought for profit, otherwise Radsinski was OK under Moyes, Ferguson did alright, Campbell was on his last legs, otherwise my mind is blank

Oh James Vaughan, shame he's a crock

Straqularsi, he's another, how can you forget about him! He's pretty shite, effective enough for what was paid, obviously never considered to be a 1st team regular though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the problem with moyes and strikers is the system he plays, the strikers is there more to hold the ball up bringing the midfield into play, the yak was brilliant in the season we had that run in Europe then stopping giving a shit, apparently he did the same at borough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly! the old net spend massaging comes in, massaging things away.

Even with that you've spent more over the period and slipped yet further behind, despite all you lot going on about how shite the Utd team is these days!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Case in point really. Lots of strikers signed under Moyes are so incredibly forgettable. The ones that are remembered are the big money ones, and still as disappointments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's only made 3 (if you can call them big money) of which only Beattie has been a dissapoitment, Yak was ace until he was injured, Johnson was sold on for a Profit to fund Yakubu.

Better record than most I imagine.

The likes of Bilyaletdinov and Koldrup are far worse signings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't use net spend and the money raised from extorting money for the likes of Rooney and Lescott then Everton are one of the league's big spenders. Probably the highest outside the top 6 clubs (the expected top 6, not us).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy Johnson's record (just looked it up) was 17 in 61. Considering he got over 20 in one season for a relegated team that's hardly a success?

Depends on your definition of big money, but if you take out Man U, City, Chelsea, Liverpool then it's big money. Arsenal's record of £16m is similar to Everton's for Fellaini isn't it?

Edited by Benj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that side didn't have Tim Cahill scoring 20 odd goals a season and indeed had Johnson taken all the pennos he won. He didn't take them at Everton.

15 million on Fellaini was eye watering stuff, completely irresponsible now looking back on it in regards to how the banks have tightened things up. Luckily its worked out and I suspect we'll make money on him this summer. Looks like peanuts now the likes of Jordan Henderson are going for more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

We're 8th it seems. About where we're likely to finish

http://www.transferleague.co.uk/

Liverpool are 3rd. They'll finish 15 points or so shy of that this year.

there's a difference between spending the third most, and being in 3rd and spending the 3rd most tho. The starting position for any spending is of huge relevance.

I'd probably be right (can't be bothered to look) in saying that City have been the top spenders for several seasons, yet only now they're looking like they might get the top league position.

And likewise, if (say) Wigan went on a City-type spending spree this summer and outspent everyone, no one would realistically expect them to win the league or even get close to it via that no.1 spend.

The starting position for any spending is of huge relevance. Liverpool's starting position for their spending over the last year or so means they'd have never got close to winning the league this year, even if they should have done a bit better than they have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds about right. Just saying that Everton do spend quite a lot in proportion to other mid-table clubs. Not having a go, just stating it's not exceptional.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's a difference between spending the third most, and being in 3rd and spending the 3rd most tho. The starting position for any spending is of huge relevance.

I'd probably be right (can't be bothered to look) in saying that City have been the top spenders for several seasons, yet only now they're looking like they might get the top league position.

And likewise, if (say) Wigan went on a City-type spending spree this summer and outspent everyone, no one would realistically expect them to win the league or even get close to it via that no.1 spend.

The starting position for any spending is of huge relevance. Liverpool's starting position for their spending over the last year or so means they'd have never got close to winning the league this year, even if they should have done a bit better than they have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has Cahill ever got 20 goals in a season? I thought he got ~12 most years?

Maybe it's a harsh view of Johnson, but it certainly wasn't a good signing even if it wasn't awful.

He's an excellent player though. How long has he got on his contract?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everton fans don't view Johnson as a failure, although perhaps could have hoped for more, we never played in a manner to suit his game though.

No idea re Cahill, 20 does seem like loads though, Lampard only gets around that!

Fellaini? 5 years. He's just signed a new one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The media seem to gloss over it though! So many articles and comments about "how well Moyes does with no money". Mid-table club on mid-table budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...