Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2011-2012


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    1469

  • The Nal

    1095

  • kaosmark2

    1095

  • strummer77

    896

  • Admin

I fail to believe that having Gerrard in the team in a negative thing. If it is statistically, then fine. Stats can throw up all sorts of opinions. But if people believe its true, then Gerrard is being badly/under/over/mis used by Daglish. Hes a cracking player.

Obviously.

I'll counter The Guardian by saying that without him, Liverpool would have won nothing over the last 10 years. Zero, zilch, nada. No Istanbul, no FA Cup, no near win in the Premiership and they wouldn't have attracted half the good players they've had to the club either.

Theres a certain irony in the Guardians article from yesterday - really questioning Gerrard as a player for the first time - based on statistics and then Comolli getting the sack today.

I think you've been a bit unfair to the article there - it wasn't saying that Gerrard wasn't a great player, and it made a point of acknowledging the impact he's had over the years. It wasn't even claiming to be right, the whole thing was being presented as an idea, something that might not be true (as it was doing by pointing out that Lucas got injured around the same time Gerrard got fit).

I've far from swallowed that article hook line and sinker, but I recognise a lot of what it said at other clubs who have had a similarly 'big' player, and even if it doesn't apply to Gerrard and I've got things wrong, I've thought for a long time that Henderson sort-of looks over-awed when Gerrard's also on the pitch. He appears to me to play with more confidence when Gerrard isn't there.

So I reckon there could be something to what the stats say (while some is also down to losing Lucas), but probably not to the extent that Liverpool would be better off getting rid of Gerrard. Yet.

Sooner or later that time is going to come, and it won't be far off. If Liverpool are going to be a competitive team again in the near-future then they'll need to do it fast, cos you're right, they'll struggle harder to get good players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In other news, Utd have agreed to sign Nico Gaitan from Benfica for 22m with Macheda and Bebe :sarcastic: going the other way too. Total deal valued at around 40m. A lot of money.

Anyone know anything about him? Hardly the most prolific from what I've seen.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In other news, Utd have agreed to sign Nico Gaitan from Benfica for 22m with Macheda and Bebe :sarcastic: going the other way too. Total deal valued at around 40m. A lot of money.

Anyone know anything about him? Hardly the most prolific from what I've seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been saying for years liverpool should sell gerrard.

It reminds me of bryan robson in his hey day, both great players but when robson was injured(which was alot) united didnt have a clue without him. Not so much now but when gerrard was out the team liverpool were the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In other news, Utd have agreed to sign Nico Gaitan from Benfica for 22m with Macheda and Bebe :sarcastic: going the other way too. Total deal valued at around 40m. A lot of money.

Anyone know anything about him? Hardly the most prolific from what I've seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Liverpool were going to sell him they would have had to do it a few years ago when chelsea were sniffing and used the money to bring in a high class younger replacement. I'm not sure what transfer fee Liverpool would get now, but I don't think it would be huge, better off keeping him but looking to gradually decrease his influence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Predictions for the FA cup semis. Liverpool to win a narrow match against everton with a Gerrard winner, prompting the media to discuss if he is the greatest premiership midfielder of all time. Chelsea to beat spurs 2-0 in a dull match. Resulting in a boring liverpool v chelsea final, although as variety is the spice of life I would prefer everton v spurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Predictions for the FA cup semis. Liverpool to win a narrow match against everton with a Gerrard winner, prompting the media to discuss if he is the greatest premiership midfielder of all time. Chelsea to beat spurs 2-0 in a dull match. Resulting in a boring liverpool v chelsea final, although as variety is the spice of life I would prefer everton v spurs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everton to beat Liverpool 2-1 with Andy Carroll getting 2 glaring misses, Gerrard scoring just after Liverpool go 2-1 down to start talk of another legendary Gerrard fightback before it sizzles out into nothingness.

Spurs to tear Chelsea apart, score a goal ~ 20 minutes, absolutely dominate but fail to hit the back of the net again, then Torres to dive over someone's leg, get a pen, Lampard to score it, before Drogba scores a winner in extra-time to prompt claims that he's still not finished and has a lot to contribute, despite Mata doing most of the work for the goal.

That said, I'd rather like Spurs to beat Liverpool in the final just to ensure that extra Europa spot is up for grabs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • 👍 plus they brought their own screens 📺 either side of the stage.
    • Production was the only thing that could even explain why she would back out. Like they had sorted out the financials and she was fine with it and then a production meeting happened. It all fell apart. It was very clear that she was not going to compromise her show one bit and then that show in Brazil pretty much confirmed it. There was like one element they couldnt pull off outdoors, but it was negligible since the rest was a carbon copy of the tour she had been on. Glasto is not willing to make any bold changes on the Pyramid stage so then theyre kinda stuck in terms of what some acts want/demand. I think the easiest solution to that is putting her on Friday. You deal with the changes for one night and then re configure for the rest of the weekend. In 24 they were fortunate to have had Dua and Coldplay on Fri and Sat so they could both use the b stage. But I think it was removed for Sunday?     I saw a random rag article earlier that said Olivia Dean turned down Glasto BECAUSE her ex ( not even confirmed dating ) Harry Styles was playing the fest. hahahaha
    • No argument that he’s bigger than ever, I just have no enthusiasm for it.
    • Keep in mind those crowds were full of teenagers. Glasto aint full of teenagers. Theres no way she could demand headline and get it because they got other acts to give the slot to who deserve it with a bigger catalog. Reading/Leeds would headline her cause its still LN.  If the fest was struggling its Other headline. But a 3rd down Pyramid is likely the landing spot. Itll go down like the Camila Cabello performance pretty much.
    • Norwich times if anyone is interested 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...