Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2025


#1SzigetFan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, billybigballs said:

Just seen Way Out West announced Little Simz yesterday. She's playing Friday 8 August. Hope she's not another amazing act who's around at the time of Sziget that they miss out on. This one would be unforgivable!

Some great solo female artists around in August: Simz, Doechii, Lola Young, Jorja Smith, Suki Waterhouse.

 

Then there's also Wet Leg, The Last Dinner Party, London Grammar and Amyl and the Sniffers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, So Sad Simon said:

Some great solo female artists around in August: Simz, Doechii, Lola Young, Jorja Smith, Suki Waterhouse.

 

Then there's also Wet Leg, The Last Dinner Party, London Grammar and Amyl and the Sniffers.

Give me most of these and I'll be completely satisfied with the lineup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the real issue is here, if they had strong undercard names, what's the reason that they've held them back? Especially as day tickets have already gone on sale now. 

 

Unless they have been waiting to see how the festival sells before continuing any negotiations with acts which have gaps in their schedule. 

 

The later the names are announced, the smaller the chance of international guests deciding for sziget, which it does rely on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Daniele82 said:

therefore, they are probable: queen of stone age, empire of the sun, damiano david, wet leg, idles, will smith  (london grammar i think not)

No. 

 

QOTSA and Will Smith are definitely not being announced. They are headliners and no more headliners are being announced.

 

Maybe a small chance for the others 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FestivalJamie said:

I think the real issue is here, if they had strong undercard names, what's the reason that they've held them back? Especially as day tickets have already gone on sale now. 

 

Unless they have been waiting to see how the festival sells before continuing any negotiations with acts which have gaps in their schedule. 

 

The later the names are announced, the smaller the chance of international guests deciding for sziget, which it does rely on.

Probably any number of reasons they haven't been announced. It's six weeks since the last announcement and the bookers have probably been negotiating with many acts beyond that point.

 

Getting the headliners on board was the main thing, which they've done so can now focus on giving the line-up some depth.

 

There is definitely a significant gap in the middle of the festival that needs filling - the subs and the Revolut Stage headliners. Some of these are already announced but there's some obvious gaps on certain days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, billybigballs said:

Probably any number of reasons they haven't been announced. It's six weeks since the last announcement and the bookers have probably been negotiating with many acts beyond that point.

 

Getting the headliners on board was the main thing, which they've done so can now focus on giving the line-up some depth.

 

There is definitely a significant gap in the middle of the festival that needs filling - the subs and the Revolut Stage headliners. Some of these are already announced but there's some obvious gaps on certain days.


My reasoning: they didn’t know how well the days were gonna do. As they now see how well each day sell they can use the remaining strong undercards to rebalance the days.

 

I am certain that the Shawn Mendes day does so well partially because of the strong undercards. 
 

like I would buy a dayticket for that and I have zero interest in the man himself.

Edited by Akujin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Akujin said:


My reasoning: they didn’t know how well the days were gonna do. As they now see how well each day sell they can use the remaining strong undercards to rebalance the days.

 

I am certain that the Shawn Mendes day does so well partially because of the strong undercards. 
 

like I would buy a dayticket for that and I have zero interest in the man himself.

Hahaha - agreed. He is, to me, one of the least interesting acts playing that day.

 

I think that, if people are going to buy a day ticket to a festival, they need a minimum of three recognisable acts playing that day - so, even if you don't watch them, you'll feel like you are getting value for money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Akujin said:


My reasoning: they didn’t know how well the days were gonna do. As they now see how well each day sell they can use the remaining strong undercards to rebalance the days.

 

I am certain that the Shawn Mendes day does so well partially because of the strong undercards. 
 

like I would buy a dayticket for that and I have zero interest in the man himself.

 

I think your under playing the pull of mendes, whilst overplaying the pull of furtado. 

 

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that in february/March There Is no much of negotiation left for bands that already have a tour scheduled. My Guess Is that Sziget have already booked all names in Advance. The rest Is all about marketing. My Hope Is that they have announced the mainstream acts so far and have a clear idea now of how well this Is went. They got their under 21 crowd, now it's time to boost prices and Sales by putting something interesting on the tablet for the grand finale

Edited by Emotin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Emotin said:

I think that in february/March There Is no much of negotiation left for bands that already have a tour scheduled. My Guess Is that Sziget have already booked all names in Advance. The rest Is all about marketing. My Hope Is that they have announced the mainstream acts so far and have a clear idea now of how well this Is went. They got their under 21 crowd, now it's time to boost prices and Sales by putting something interesting on the tablet for the grand finale

Oh yeah all the names are locked by now I would imagine, it will be interesting to see what comes

 

11 minutes ago, mathuska said:

machine gun kelly? Childish gambino? Glass animals? Sam fender?

I think Fender is headlining all his European festivals this year so I doubt that he will take a smaller Sziget slot but we never know

 

4 minutes ago, ReljaGajić said:

Glass Animals are playing Osheaga festival in Canada on 1st of August

Not completely out of the question, from my memory Billie Eilish also played Osheaga i think the same year she played

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...