Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Best glamping for next year. Advice needed please.


angelin

Recommended Posts

As a side note, we’ve been looking at hiring motorhomes for next year and staying in general Camper Vans East… But it’s looking like costing twice as much for the same group… 2 x motorhomes £2000 - £2500 to hire… Plus pitch fees!!! 

Really want to try a motorhome (want to try every different option that we can afford eventually.) but the £3k between 6 is going to be very difficult to save for!!! And yet we spotted absolutely loads of hired motorhomes, in fact it’s the details of the ones we spotted this year that we’ve used to get quotes for next year. I find it weird how nobody bats an eyelid at those…

Genuinely twice as expensive. Fair play if you own one, but I can’t afford that, I don’t like finance as it is, bought my car after saving. But we did look into financing one, and it was like £700, every month, for 7 years!!! It was pretty low end too.

One day I’ll have the time to convert a high top LWB, mark my words, but right now I’m working way too many hours for that. 😕 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not gonna pile on @Superscally but whatever your views on glamping, love fields and all the rest of it, airing them quite so...clearly on a post making enquiries re: accessibility issues is a bit off pal.

FWIW I'm not a massive fan of them either, but time and place and all that.

Message ends 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Quark said:

Not gonna pile on @Superscally but whatever your views on glamping, love fields and all the rest of it, airing them quite so...clearly on a post making enquiries re: accessibility issues is a bit off pal.

FWIW I'm not a massive fan of them either, but time and place and all that.

Message ends 👍

No offence taken, don’t worry, and I hope he and the OP took none either. It’s an opinion forum, he has an opinion and is entitled to air it. (Some of his preconceptions are wrong, but that’s what discussion is for.) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Alvoram said:

No offence taken, don’t worry, and I hope he and the OP took none either. It’s an opinion forum, he has an opinion and is entitled to air it. (Some of his preconceptions are wrong, but that’s what discussion is for.) 

I'm being offended on someone else's behalf, what else is the internet for?  😁

Edited by Quark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, angelin said:

If you know of a hotel and an easy way to get a taxi that’s less than that please do share as it’s another idea. People can camp where they want with their honest money. Sometimes things just happened and they take the wind out of your sail and things have to be adjusted accordingly.

There’s a shuttle bus from Glastonbury town hall, runs hourly to and from the site starting 7am to 2am the next morning. 4.50 per journey. Travelodge and premier inn in town are bookable but get dearer as you get nearer the festival time annd then sell out.  Also cheaper if you book a week rather than the five festival days. Taxis have to be booked well in advance and very hard if not impossible to get.  An option if camping anywhere on or off site is a problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't posted here in ages but wanted to offer my two cents as @angelin sounds like you maybe have accessibility needs. My friend applied for access camping this year and it was a lifesaver for her. Loads of space, you can get a shuttle bus from the gate to the campsite, there are clean toilets and showers etc. She was allowed to have three people with her so we all camped there. Right by Woodsies but honestly just a stone's throw from Pyramid too. I'd really recommend it. Not sure what your issues are and if you'd be eligible but it's worth applying and seeing if they can help. Had a great experience camping there this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zoo Music Girl said:

Haven't posted here in ages but wanted to offer my two cents as @angelin sounds like you maybe have accessibility needs. My friend applied for access camping this year and it was a lifesaver for her. Loads of space, you can get a shuttle bus from the gate to the campsite, there are clean toilets and showers etc. She was allowed to have three people with her so we all camped there. Right by Woodsies but honestly just a stone's throw from Pyramid too. I'd really recommend it. Not sure what your issues are and if you'd be eligible but it's worth applying and seeing if they can help. Had a great experience camping there this year.

👋

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Quark said:

Not gonna pile on @Superscally but whatever your views on glamping, love fields and all the rest of it, airing them quite so...clearly on a post making enquiries re: accessibility issues is a bit off pal.

FWIW I'm not a massive fan of them either, but time and place and all that.

Message ends 👍

Hey chief! Got me a bit wrong there. I was railing against this land being used for massively expensive camping when it should be made available FOR accessibility. Even if the organisers could make a concession to their huge profits to make an area available to those who need it for "cost" price, that would be massive...but they won't, because all they care about is the money. Where is the Love? Not in those Fields.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Superscally said:

Hey chief! Got me a bit wrong there. I was railing against this land being used for massively expensive camping when it should be made available FOR accessibility. Even if the organisers could make a concession to their huge profits to make an area available to those who need it for "cost" price, that would be massive...but they won't, because all they care about is the money. Where is the Love? Not in those Fields.

Fair dos. Meant to catch you at the meet btw but got caught up in chat (as you do) and lost sight. Hope you had a good one 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Quark said:

Fair dos. Meant to catch you at the meet btw but got caught up in chat (as you do) and lost sight. Hope you had a good one 

Yeh man, saw lots of friendly faces, but never as much as you hoped. Had a mixed one. Musically incredible, but wasn't in the right emotional headspace due to family issues. If I could have handed ticket to someone else, wouldn't have gone, but still have enough lovely memories from the peaks to make me return. Hope yours was ace x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Superscally said:

Yeh man, saw lots of friendly faces, but never as much as you hoped. Had a mixed one. Musically incredible, but wasn't in the right emotional headspace due to family issues. If I could have handed ticket to someone else, wouldn't have gone, but still have enough lovely memories from the peaks to make me return. Hope yours was ace x

Ugh. Obvs don't want or expect details but hope all works out ok. Sounds crap. 

Feel bad now saying I had a cracker! (obviously I don't feel that bad 😉)

Edited by Quark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like you might be in touch already with the access team but I would highly recommend spring ground if that would make it easier for you, and possibly applying for a PA depending on your circumstances.

I have camped at SG for the last few times I have been, I have a +1 access requirement but don't apply for a PA as we get a ticket for my husband who usually helps.

However, I am rethinking that as I realise I can't/shouldn't rely 100% on him.  😑

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Superscally said:

Hey chief! Got me a bit wrong there. I was railing against this land being used for massively expensive camping when it should be made available FOR accessibility. Even if the organisers could make a concession to their huge profits to make an area available to those who need it for "cost" price, that would be massive...but they won't, because all they care about is the money. Where is the Love? Not in those Fields.

If I understand it right, your main gripe was with the land owners selfishness and profiteering, not renting the fields to the festival like other local land owners because they see a route to much bigger profits on the back of the festival. And a small amount of resentment to us for supporting their profiteering. 

I can understand that.

Imagine if all land owners around there decided they wanted to try the same, and not rent their land to the festival... (Assuming some land is still rented?) I get your point, and it's a good one (assuming I've got this right?) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Alvoram said:

 

One day I’ll have the time to convert a high top LWB, mark my words, but right now I’m working way too many hours for that. 😕 

I was surprised seeing a few hired vans as well, I'd have thought at that point just straight up glamping would work out better, benefits of campervan is travel before and after I suppose.

In terms of getting one, converting yourself is definitely the way to go. Prices once converted are ridiculous, and anyone with half decent DIY skills can do it. If you're worried about electrics you can pay over the odds and just buy a premade kit from somewhere like wired campers, but again, a few hours researching online and you could just do it yourself (they're all basically the same systems)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BBC7BBCHEAVEN said:

I was surprised seeing a few hired vans as well, I'd have thought at that point just straight up glamping would work out better, benefits of campervan is travel before and after I suppose.

In terms of getting one, converting yourself is definitely the way to go. Prices once converted are ridiculous, and anyone with half decent DIY skills can do it. If you're worried about electrics you can pay over the odds and just buy a premade kit from somewhere like wired campers, but again, a few hours researching online and you could just do it yourself (they're all basically the same systems)

Thanks, my biggest worry is more the woodwork tbh, I'm pretty good with electrical work, and even plumbing, but woodwork (and metalwork, cutting out the windows etc terrifies me) has never been my strong point. 

I've been watching Youtube conversions for at least a couple of years now, with a mind to picking up ideas and skills (in theory.) I'll bet when I'm ready to take the plunge that there's some good forums / communities on the internet too? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Mark H said:

How were the toilet and shower queues? I stayed at Worthy View last year and was a bit disappointed by the facilities. Might have a think about Tangerine fields if they manage that a bit better… also has the bonus of being able to book as soon as you have a ticket and not waiting around for second “T-day..”

Yes the queues were quite long the later in the morning you left it but manageable.  Also good for us as we got local tickets and there was a camp resale

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Haven't posted here in ages but wanted to offer my two cents as @angelin sounds like you maybe have accessibility needs. My friend applied for access camping this year and it was a lifesaver for her. Loads of space, you can get a shuttle bus from the gate to the campsite, there are clean toilets and showers etc. She was allowed to have three people with her so we all camped there. Right by Woodsies but honestly just a stone's throw from Pyramid too. I'd really recommend it. Not sure what your issues are and if you'd be eligible but it's worth applying and seeing if they can help. Had a great experience camping there this year.

I was eligible last year but was put off by someone telling me its so far out. When you say four people can come with you do you mean with their four tents? . I dnt know how I will be next year as its a quite rare case Im dealing with. This year I was very tired and the weather didnt help. The accessibility team were a godsend. I was disappointed with the toilets around site though. Even the people manning them said they hardly so any cleaners this year. My ideal situation would be WV without  the hill. I dont just want to stop going its been my annual break since Travis headlined in the wet 90’s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Alvoram said:

If I understand it right, your main gripe was with the land owners selfishness and profiteering, not renting the fields to the festival like other local land owners because they see a route to much bigger profits on the back of the festival. And a small amount of resentment to us for supporting their profiteering. 

I can understand that.

Imagine if all land owners around there decided they wanted to try the same, and not rent their land to the festival... (Assuming some land is still rented?) I get your point, and it's a good one (assuming I've got this right?) 

Bang on. In a round about way. Everyone has to make some money and I get that the festival is an inconvenience for many, but the sheer cost of it...squeezing the lemon dry. Skankery. Some can afford it. Most would be stretched, but still elect to do it because of their circumstances. f**k that guy/gal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, angelin said:

I was eligible last year but was put off by someone telling me its so far out. When you say four people can come with you do you mean with their four tents? . I dnt know how I will be next year as its a quite rare case Im dealing with. This year I was very tired and the weather didnt help. The accessibility team were a godsend. I was disappointed with the toilets around site though. Even the people manning them said they hardly so any cleaners this year. My ideal situation would be WV without  the hill. I dont just want to stop going its been my annual break since Travis headlined in the wet 90’s.

I suppose it depends by what you mean by far out. As I say, it was right next door to Woodsies this year (I believe it used to be somewhere else though; it's Spring Ground now). We could walk three minutes one way and be in Woodsies and three minutes the other and be at back of Pyramid. It's not close to SE Corner/Park, though.

So my friend has stage four cancer so a lot of aspects of the festival would have been difficult for her (and still were to a degree, including access to accessible toilets around the site) but we really found it helped. She was allowed three other people camping with her. One was her PA/husband and the other two were me and my partner. We got given wristbands that allowed us into the field that we had to show to get in and out. No limit on tents and there is so much space in the field compared to the others (they have to keep pathways etc for wheelchairs) that I don't think it would matter if all four of you brought a tent. We could have fit loads more around us.

On top of that it felt very secure and chilled at night, like a little oasis of calm to come back to when my friend was struggling with the heat/crowds/walking. We really rated it. And of course it's at no extra cost, which is a big bonus.

We didn't drive but I believe if you do and you have access parking it's very close by.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We stay at Windenlake, two people sharing a basic caravan including VIP wristband and EPO wristband works out to about £4k for both. Very expensive but if you can and want to do it that way it’s a nice way to do Glasto at my age. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for that and I hope your friends treatment will give her more good quality time. Things have changed, so they tell me. I beleive they do pre erected on that campsite also so that might be worth looking into. Where you able to use the short cuts with her?  Its just not a side to the festival Im used to but it sounds like it could work if I can somehow get my extra two friends in with their tents and me and three friends in an erected. It might be something the6 would allow if theres such a big space. Youve been very helpful and thank you for not giving me a mouthfull😀😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

9 hours ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Haven't posted here in ages but wanted to offer my two cents as @angelin sounds like you maybe have accessibility needs. My friend applied for access camping this year and it was a lifesaver for her. Loads of space, you can get a shuttle bus from the gate to the campsite, there are clean toilets and showers etc. She was allowed to have three people with her so we all camped there. Right by Woodsies but honestly just a stone's throw from Pyramid too. I'd really recommend it. Not sure what your issues are and if you'd be eligible but it's worth applying and seeing if they can help. Had a great experience camping there this year.

I spoke to my friends about this on one of the podcasts (shameless plug).  One of the key messages is that people should ask for the assistance that is available because you would expect it day to day life.  There is chat about the process in there as well

Edited by Festival Sounds Podcast
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...