Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

U.S. Presidential Election


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, FloopFiller said:

After nine years of them calling him Hitler it really has lost all meaning and effect and I’m surprised they continue to run with it so recently. Yes, he seemingly showed admiration for some of Hitler workings, but people didn’t care at the comparison in 2016 so not sure why they thought people would care now. 

It was people in his last administration who were saying this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, kalifire said:

 

I still think that comparison is hysterical and very unhelpful to the left. 

Sorry, I wasn't intending to make the comparison between the two people, as has already been done several times. I was comparing similarities in the way people think about their policy ideas. Particularly the fact that people thought Hitler would never carry out the unthinkable acts, he'd promised to carry out, on the Jewish population, never mind actually carry out much worse in the end. They thought the constitution would prevent it. That's where the similarities I was pointing out lie.  

Edited by Alvoram
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

So...that Selzer poll..??

Yeah, insanely off, as we’re almost all of the rest. In fact, the only ones that seemed to get it right were the right wing polls that I’ve been disparaging all along. Trump is just such an enigma that pollsters and political experts have just been totally left in the dirt by him nonstop. Truly one of a kind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Only upside is that given how quick the last 4 years have gone, it'll be 2028 before you know it and he can't run again. And if he does decide he's too important to abide by the 2 term limits thing, he'll be older than Biden was now so there's an argument he probably will have to be ushered aside.

 

Though that will be a test as to what strength in depth that cause has. Or if anyone can be somehow capable of evading consequence to even a tenth of the times that arse has.

Yes, I think his health will decline quite rapidly. Only two years to the senate elections. Then the contest is on to be the next candidate. His populism needs a character like his to enthuse people. I'm not sure there is a natural successor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, lazyred said:

Yes, I think his health will decline quite rapidly. Only two years to the senate elections. Then the contest is on to be the next candidate. His populism needs a character like his to enthuse people. I'm not sure there is a natural successor.

Yup, this particular brand of conservatism dies with Trump. Whoever their next guy is (Vance you’d assume) just isn’t Trump and will struggle to keep up the same level of enthusiasm amongst certain demographics. Dems need to get a good candidate in order (Newsom or Shapiro?) for in four years time to combat the dregs of MAGA. 

Edited by FloopFiller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, FloopFiller said:

Yeah, insanely off, as we’re almost all of the rest. In fact, the only ones that seemed to get it right were the right wing polls that I’ve been disparaging all along. Trump is just such an enigma that pollsters and political experts have just been totally left in the dirt by him nonstop. Truly one of a kind.

The Selzer poll was an outlier. The swing state results are within the margin of error of those mainstream 50/50 polls. Trump won them all so his vote was underestimated but only by about 2%. The Electoral College totals flatter Trump but he didn't win every state by a big margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, FloopFiller said:

Yup, this particular brand of conservatism dies with Trump. Whoever their next guy is (Vance you’d assume) just isn’t Trump and will struggle to keep up the same level of enthusiasm amongst certain demographics. Dems need to get a good candidate in order (Newsom or Shapiro?) for in four years time to combat the dregs of MAGA. 

Joe Rogan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, maelzoid said:

You joke?  TBH could well be Leon or Tucker Carlson. But... it  is usually the case that these kind of cult-of-personality types don't transfer their following on to their successors. 

Can't be Musk as born outside US...he'll have to stick to his toy rockets.

I don't know much about Carlson or Rogan as not my bag, I just know that Rogan has this massive following with poor aggrieved bigoted men, and that Carlson is a Putin loving prick....so both good candidates I guess.

Who knows who will come along. Not many people would have thought Trump would be so popular a decade ago when he was just being a rude c**t, but here we are the rude c**t is president again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, maelzoid said:

You joke?  TBH could well be Leon or Tucker Carlson. But... it  is usually the case that these kind of cult-of-personality types don't transfer their following on to their successors. 

Yeah even those guys just don’t have the ‘it’ factor that Trump does, and even his shithead kids don’t seem nearly as well liked as him (although I wouldn’t be surprised to see Baron run at some point, if he were that way inclined). Nobody else in the Republican roster comes close to Trump and politics will go back to being far more ‘normal’ once he gone, albeit with the stink of MAGA attached to it for a few years after. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, maelzoid said:

 

Given how things are going, it's possible they could change that rule before the next election.

Was just about to say this. Nothing stopping him trying to change the constitution with control of the senate and house… Far fetched yes but it’s trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to see Trump win although I didn't mind Sleepy Joe either as he was a proud Irishman. I feel I have more in common with Trump supporters than the people who would vote Harris.

Irish people only seem to like presidents when they are Irish Catholic. My great grandfather had a photo of JFK on the wall.

Trump's mother was from the islands of Scotland so his heritage is Gaelic too just like us.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, maelzoid said:

 

Given how things are going, it's possible they could change that rule before the next election.

Allowing a non American to be president seems like the last thing Republicans would want given everything they stand for. 
 

Also Musk basically gets whatever he wants with Trump and Vance in the White House anyway so he doesn’t really need it. He went all in on Trump and it paid off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FloopFiller said:

Allowing a non American to be president seems like the last thing Republicans would want given everything they stand for. 
 

Also Musk basically gets whatever he wants with Trump and Vance in the White House anyway so he doesn’t really need it. He went all in on Trump and it paid off.

Musk would be a terrible speaker and debater and a sh*t politician. 

I think Vance could probably have a good go...he's smart. He says sh*tty stuff that gets the base riled up...but can seem like a genuinely nice guy too if needs be as he did in debate with Walz. I definitely wouldn't bet against him standing and winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

Musk would be a terrible speaker and debater and a sh*t politician. 

I think Vance could probably have a good go...he's smart. He says sh*tty stuff that gets the base riled up...but can seem like a genuinely nice guy too if needs be as he did in debate with Walz. I definitely wouldn't bet against him standing and winning.

Vance will run next time, I'm almost certain (assuming he isn’t already the incumbent president by that point anyway). Dems need to make sure they’ve got somebody good to run against him because as much as I think he’s a prick, he’s clearly good at politics and will be a decent candidate for Republicans following Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, FloopFiller said:

Vance will run next time, I'm almost certain (assuming he isn’t already the incumbent president by that point anyway). Dems need to make sure they’ve got somebody good to run against him because as much as I think he’s a prick, he’s clearly good at politics and will be a decent candidate for Republicans following Trump.

Democrats need to find a reason why ordinary working class (or middle america) should vote for them...instead of just don't vote for the scary fascist which obviously doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of people seem quite dismissive about Trump voters and I think it’s an issue that people on the left often come across a bit snobby with voters who vote for right wing parties. While the MAGA types will get the most exposure, there will be many who think Trumps a bit of a d*ck, but will make the economy better. That’s a perfectly rationale view, even if I would have voted differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pink_triangle said:

A lot of people seem quite dismissive about Trump voters and I think it’s an issue that people on the left often come across a bit snobby with voters who vote for right wing parties. While the MAGA types will get the most exposure, there will be many who think Trumps a bit of a d*ck, but will make the economy better. That’s a perfectly rationale view, even if I would have voted differently.

Unfortunately a completely uninformed view according to many economists, but Trump screaming that he can fix the economy unfortunately overshadowed that. Who knows, maybe he will fix things, but everything he’s proposing says that won’t be the case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I got in for £11.25 in the end, which was absolutely ridiculously good value, and made the queues and overselling of the venue much more tolerable! Sniping in on other people’s unwanted tickets on the day of an event might become my new hobby I think 🥳
    • Ann and Nancy Wilson are planning a final world tour for HEART starting next year. They were never at Glastonbury. They should do it. 
    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
    • Definitely. UKIP also used Merkel welcoming 1 million Afgans to Europe in 2015 during the brexit vote.   Politicians in other countries within the EU know the are going to lose voters to parties to the right of them over stuff like this and they've no control over it.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...