Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Orbital


gooner1990

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, bombfrog said:

Looks like a tiny venue for them. I've been there once for a Secret Cinema event but it used much more of the space because it was over multiple rooms. If I remember rightly there's not much space in that bit.

It's a big room but it's very long and very thin so not the best for a gig when everyone wants to be nearer the front. I don'y know how many went in the end but the room did look quite busy but may be due to the long, thin shape.

The whole venue is massive though, they only used a small part of itwhen I went to see Jon Hopkins there. There is at least one other big room there that would be better for gigs (rather than DJs) IMO.

Edited by Johnnyseven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looked like a very odd venue, look at the visual screen, very different. They had a little argument on stage during the encore 😬

 

If they split again then I do hope Paul can keep the Orbital name and just go on alone, his 8:58 stuff was class but he couldn't shift tickets under the new name, had nowhere near the same rig for live shows either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 3/16/2020 at 1:33 AM, WS_Jack_III said:

Looked like a very odd venue, look at the visual screen, very different. They had a little argument on stage during the encore 😬

 

If they split again then I do hope Paul can keep the Orbital name and just go on alone, his 8:58 stuff was class but he couldn't shift tickets under the new name, had nowhere near the same rig for live shows either.

I don't want to see half of Orbital pretending to be the real deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Homer said:

Orbital live set streaming now on Twitter from the studio (Paul only) until 4pm.

https://twitter.com/streamGM?fbclid=IwAR1ur44BAqG8b0JHSqamBwsl7AAe7PabDLwVdZmt6ZqC2Rp4CZjXXBw8H9U

I bloody missed it, hoping it gets reuploaded on the group.

3 hours ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I don't want to see half of Orbital pretending to be the real deal. 

I'm just saying if it happens and Paul tries to continue (as he did before as 8:58, where he did live sets with some Orbital tunes) I hope he can keep the name, so he can sell tickets and records, obviously I'd rather they keep going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, sadimmock said:

I really enjoyed that 

Me too - wasn't advertised as such so was expecting a crap DJ set! Otherwise would have raised the alarm earlier. Anyone know what songs two and three were? Seemed like a couple of rarities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I don't want to see half of Orbital pretending to be the real deal. 

It worked pretty well yesterday! 


Think you'd be pretty interested to watch this back. Been speculation as to how much they do 'live', but he was happy for everyone to watch him 'in action'. I've no real clue but he seemed to be 'doing' quite a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/16/2020 at 1:33 AM, WS_Jack_III said:

Looked like a very odd venue, look at the visual screen, very different. They had a little argument on stage during the encore 😬

 

If they split again then I do hope Paul can keep the Orbital name and just go on alone, his 8:58 stuff was class but he couldn't shift tickets under the new name, had nowhere near the same rig for live shows either.

The difference was, they were headlining an all-day bill in a nighclub, It wasn't their gig, they were just part of the bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Homer said:

It worked pretty well yesterday! 


Think you'd be pretty interested to watch this back. Been speculation as to how much they do 'live', but he was happy for everyone to watch him 'in action'. I've no real clue but he seemed to be 'doing' quite a lot.

It's more that if Paul got the name, then that could really put a damper on whenever the next reunion is. I've seen him do some Orbital tracks live as 8:58 and not only did they sound extraordinary, there was a large live element to it.

Orbital have always been on the more live side of electronic performances. You just have to listen to one of their live albums to realise that they're not just doing playbacks of the album tracks.

I've got no problem with Paul as a solo act, I just think the brothers are better together. Do you know where I can watch the stream back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

It's more that if Paul got the name, then that could really put a damper on whenever the next reunion is. I've seen him do some Orbital tracks live as 8:58 and not only did they sound extraordinary, there was a large live element to it.

Orbital have always been on the more live side of electronic performances. You just have to listen to one of their live albums to realise that they're not just doing playbacks of the album tracks.

I've got no problem with Paul as a solo act, I just think the brothers are better together. Do you know where I can watch the stream back?

Does Paul do a lot more of the heavy lifting in Orbital then you reckon? I read recently that the 'used to have long hair, always wore glasses' one from the Chems does way more out of those too.

Afraid not - I looked about an hour ago. Will post here if I find it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Homer said:

Does Paul do a lot more of the heavy lifting in Orbital then you reckon? I read recently that the 'used to have long hair, always wore glasses' one from the Chems does way more out of those too.

Afraid not - I looked about an hour ago. Will post here if I find it!

It's hard to tell. Unusually for a younger brother he does appear to be the more dominant personality and was more prolific during the splits.  But it's really hard to know who does what - there does seem to be a certain extra something to the music made by Orbital proper - I guess that something is called "Phil"!

But yeah, if I had to pick, it does seem that Paul is doing more of the heavy lifting on balance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I've worked out, Paul is the main creative force. Makes all the tracks. Phil is his sounding board, Paul bounces ideas off him. Phil gets quite annoyed when people bring this up though, I've seen some quite awkward interviews. 

 

In terms of the live show, it's live sequenced so Paul triggers off segments and fiddles with the synths settings and what not. Phil usually messes with the mix from what i can tell, whacking on delays and the likes. Someone correct me if wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 4/12/2020 at 10:23 AM, stuartbert two hats said:

It's more that if Paul got the name, then that could really put a damper on whenever the next reunion is. I've seen him do some Orbital tracks live as 8:58 and not only did they sound extraordinary, there was a large live element to it.

Orbital have always been on the more live side of electronic performances. You just have to listen to one of their live albums to realise that they're not just doing playbacks of the album tracks.

I've got no problem with Paul as a solo act, I just think the brothers are better together. Do you know where I can watch the stream back?

736cf27f-e19c-48c6-b11e-64d4f434184a.thumb.jpg.d619b71a29b97e32fbd860383ced4989.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...