Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Women only venue


budvar

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, eastynh said:

You would never ever get a womens only part at the Parklife and I think thats a good thing. Everyone is there together to have a good time.

Bit sheltered

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 412
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

4 minutes ago, eastynh said:

In what respect mate?

Are you implying that Parklife is free from the patriarchy? It was a weird thing to say, are people at Glastonbury not there to have a good time? Fair enough your point was that it has its merits, but " You would never ever get a womens only part at the Parklife and I think thats a good thing" is an odd statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, eastynh said:

I will pull you up on that Woffy. Parklife gets a rough time on here and rightly so as there has been violent episodes there that have been both shocking and disgusting.

Yet Parklife is far, far more diverse and multicultural than Glastonbury is, in regards to the people that attend. There is a great mish mash of all different types of people, who in the most part are just there to enjoy themselves. That is in stark contrast to Glastonbury where it is a predominantly white crowd.

You would never ever get a womens only part at the Parklife and I think thats a good thing. Everyone is there together to have a good time.

Now you can criticise the music and the few dickheads who have given Parklife a bad name, but one thing you can't do is stereotype the crowd as it is far more diverse than Glastonbury.

Whist I agree that Glastonbury is far to white (but have no experience of parklife) you need to keep in mind that your experience in relation to the 'equality' of the festival is (if your profile is correct) very much from a mans experience, keep in mind that it's been said in this thread already that women often feel uncomfortable raising issues of sexual assault that they feel are rather 'minor' but a great deal of women are often made to feel extremely uncomfortable due to behaviour of men that many dismiss as being acceptable. I'm not suggesting that you engage or condone this type of behaviour but I think frequently we as men don't fully appreciate or understand the extent to which women this kind of behaviour impacts upon all women's lives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bloody patriarchy ruining music festivals *shakes fist*.

I personally think it's an absolute disgrace that festivals are allowed to be held were women are forced to stand in the same field as men if they are wanting to see the same act. Why dont festival organisers realise how damaging it can be to a woman if they have to come within 15 feet of a man? They could be traumatised for life.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

Are you implying that Parklife is free from the patriarchy? It was a weird thing to say, are people at Glastonbury not there to have a good time? Fair enough your point was that it has its merits, but " You would never ever get a womens only part at the Parklife and I think thats a good thing" is an odd statement.

Everyone is there at Glastonbury to have a good time, no one is saying they are not.

There are big differences between the Glastonbury crowd and the Parklife crowd. Someone said to me before I went to Glastonbury that it was just full of middle class white people, all of their heads on drugs and who refuse to grow up. Now they were right about the white people and I got the impression people were generally more prosperous than those from the environment I come from. That is not an issue for me, I had a right laugh mixing with the posh uns. You have to appreciate  though that issues affecting the working class in north west England are a bit different than those encountered by the more affluent burghs of the UK. Where I live there is great equality, most people are on the minimum wage or there abouts, thats if they have a job. Where as Glastonbury has a great political history, so rightly goes about highlighting issues that do affect us all, Parklife is pure escapism. A lot of the people there want to forget about the every day struggle of life for one day. Thats why imo there will never be a womens only section at Parklife. 

Now I appreciate that I have generalised there a little, but hopefully you will understand the point I am trying to make.

I have absolutely no issue with Glastonbury highlighting issues and fair play to all the sisters who want to chill together in their section. If a few ladies want to spend some time together without men on their case then good for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eastynh said:

Everyone is there at Glastonbury to have a good time, no one is saying they are not.

There are big differences between the Glastonbury crowd and the Parklife crowd. Someone said to me before I went to Glastonbury that it was just full of middle class white people, all of their heads on drugs and who refuse to grow up. Now they were right about the white people and I got the impression people were generally more prosperous than those from the environment I come from. That is not an issue for me, I had a right laugh mixing with the posh uns. You have to appreciate  though that issues affecting the working class in north west England are a bit different than those encountered by the more affluent burghs of the UK. Where I live there is great equality, most people are on the minimum wage or there abouts, thats if they have a job. Where as Glastonbury has a great political history, so rightly goes about highlighting issues that do affect us all, Parklife is pure escapism. A lot of the people there want to forget about the every day struggle of life for one day. Thats why imo there will never be a womens only section at Parklife. 

Now I appreciate that I have generalised there a little, but hopefully you will understand the point I am trying to make.

I have absolutely no issue with Glastonbury highlighting issues and fair play to all the sisters who want to chill together in their section. If a few ladies want to spend some time together without men on their case then good for them.

That and that it's a fucking silly idea unless being done for satire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eastynh said:

Everyone is there at Glastonbury to have a good time, no one is saying they are not.

There are big differences between the Glastonbury crowd and the Parklife crowd. Someone said to me before I went to Glastonbury that it was just full of middle class white people, all of their heads on drugs and who refuse to grow up. Now they were right about the white people and I got the impression people were generally more prosperous than those from the environment I come from. That is not an issue for me, I had a right laugh mixing with the posh uns. You have to appreciate  though that issues affecting the working class in north west England are a bit different than those encountered by the more affluent burghs of the UK. Where I live there is great equality, most people are on the minimum wage or there abouts, thats if they have a job. Where as Glastonbury has a great political history, so rightly goes about highlighting issues that do affect us all, Parklife is pure escapism. A lot of the people there want to forget about the every day struggle of life for one day. Thats why imo there will never be a womens only section at Parklife. 

Now I appreciate that I have generalised there a little, but hopefully you will understand the point I am trying to make.

I have absolutely no issue with Glastonbury highlighting issues and fair play to all the sisters who want to chill together in their section. If a few ladies want to spend some time together without men on their case then good for them.

I understand everything you said up  until "Thats why imo there will never be a womens only section at Parklife. " That may sound flippant, but I'm really struggling to see what connection you're drawing between the two. Do you  mean there will never be a women's only section because there would never be a need, or because it's very existence is political, so not escapist enough? I'm not quite following you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jonodillieono said:

Bloody patriarchy ruining music festivals *shakes fist*.

I personally think it's an absolute disgrace that festivals are allowed to be held were women are forced to stand in the same field as men if they are wanting to see the same act. Why dont festival organisers realise how damaging it can be to a woman if they have to come within 15 feet of a man? They could be traumatised for life.

 

You're not getting this are you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jonodillieono said:

Bloody patriarchy ruining music festivals *shakes fist*.

I personally think it's an absolute disgrace that festivals are allowed to be held were women are forced to stand in the same field as men if they are wanting to see the same act. Why dont festival organisers realise how damaging it can be to a woman if they have to come within 15 feet of a man? They could be traumatised for life.

 

That's really the best you can do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I understand everything you said up  until "Thats why imo there will never be a womens only section at Parklife. " That may sound flippant, but I'm really struggling to see what connection you're drawing between the two. Do you  mean there will never be a women's only section because there would never be a need, or because it's very existence is political, so not escapist enough? I'm not quite following you.

The latter presumably. 

Not really the only thing I disagree with in easty's post mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, eastynh said:

 

There are big differences between the Glastonbury crowd and the Parklife crowd. Someone said to me before I went to Glastonbury that it was just full of middle class white people, all of their heads on drugs and who refuse to grow up. Now they were right about the white people and I got the impression people were generally more prosperous than those from the environment I come from. That is not an issue for me, I had a right laugh mixing with the posh uns. You have to appreciate  though that issues affecting the working class in north west England are a bit different than those encountered by the more affluent burghs of the UK. Where I live there is great equality, most people are on the minimum wage or there abouts, thats if they have a job.

 
 
☆。★。☆。★
☆。★。☆。★  
★。☆。★。☆
★。\|/。★
          NOT
     EVERYONE 
 DOWN SOUTH
       IS RICH
★。/|\。★
☆。☆。★。☆   
☆。★。☆。★
☆。☆。★。☆

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, eastynh said:

You have to appreciate  though that issues affecting the working class in north west England are a bit different than those encountered by the more affluent burghs of the UK. Where I live there is great equality, most people are on the minimum wage or there abouts, thats if they have a job.

See it's this bit that provoked my "sheltered" comment. It's really ignorant to pass off sexism as a middle class problem, that viewpoint comes from a position of privilege and is damaging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I understand everything you said up  until "Thats why imo there will never be a womens only section at Parklife. " That may sound flippant, but I'm really struggling to see what connection you're drawing between the two. Do you  mean there will never be a women's only section because there would never be a need, or because it's very existence is political, so not escapist enough? I'm not quite following you.

I think it is a mixture of both mate. Clearly issues such as domestic violence, rape and so on affect all women, regardless of their social environment. They are not issues to be taken lightly and steps do need taking to highlight the problems and show women there is help available.

At somewhere like Parklife though, it is an entirely different climate to Glastonbury. People use it as an escape from the rigours of day to day life. They go to party and enjoy themselves. There is no political emphasis there.  

You never know mate, I may be well wide of the mark. Someone might use such a thing and benefit from it, but unfortunately I doubt it. You know what it is like round here In places like inner city Manchester, Salford and Liverpool, life can be difficult enough as it is. People need that respite from the often harsh realities of life.

This will kind of sum it up well. When Jeremy Corbyn does his talk at Glastonbury, in all probability he will speak to a bumper crowd. At Parklife he would speak to a pretty much empty tent. Yet you can not get anywhere more of a Labour territory. Thats because people priorities and social environments are totally different at the 2 events.

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, eastynh said:

I think it is a mixture of both mate. Clearly issues such as domestic violence, rape and so on affect all women, regardless of their social environment. They are not issues to be taken lightly and steps do need taking to highlight the problems and show women there is help available.

At somewhere like Parklife though, it is an entirely different climate to Glastonbury. People use it as an escape from the rigours of day to day life. They go to party and enjoy themselves. There is no political emphasis there.  

You never know mate, I may be well wide of the mark. Someone might use such a thing and benefit from it, but unfortunately I doubt it. You know what it is like round here In places like inner city Manchester, Salford and Liverpool, life can be difficult enough as it is. People need that respite from the often harsh realities of life.

This will kind of sum it up well. When Jeremy Corbyn does his talk at Glastonbury, in all probability he will speak to a bumper crowd. At Parklife he would speak to a pretty much empty tent. Yet you can not get anywhere more of a Labour territory. Thats because people priorities and social environments are totally different at the 2 events.

"Parklife!"

The temptation was overwhelming. Apologies.

Anyhoo:

Easty, your very last sentence is utter guff dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Woffy said:

"Parklife!"

The temptation was overwhelming. Apologies.

Anyhoo:

Easty, your very last sentence is utter guff dude.

Fair enough mate. I am jumping out of here now and staying away from the political stuff. It is not my strong point and often what I am trying to get across gets lost in translation. 

If anyone wants a pint at the meet up and wants to pull me up on anything I have said then go for it. It is easier trying to speak in person rather than on the net.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, fur_q said:
 
 
☆。★。☆。★
☆。★。☆。★  
★。☆。★。☆
★。\|/。★
          NOT
     EVERYONE 
 DOWN SOUTH
       IS RICH
★。/|\。★
☆。☆。★。☆   
☆。★。☆。★
☆。☆。★。☆

 

I never mentioned the south at any point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, jonodillieono said:

Bloody patriarchy ruining music festivals *shakes fist*.

I personally think it's an absolute disgrace that festivals are allowed to be held were women are forced to stand in the same field as men if they are wanting to see the same act. Why dont festival organisers realise how damaging it can be to a woman if they have to come within 15 feet of a man? They could be traumatised for life.

 

What the fuck are you talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jonodillieono said:

Bloody patriarchy ruining music festivals *shakes fist*.

I personally think it's an absolute disgrace that festivals are allowed to be held were women are forced to stand in the same field as men if they are wanting to see the same act. Why dont festival organisers realise how damaging it can be to a woman if they have to come within 15 feet of a man? They could be traumatised for life.

 

II don't really get this kind of attitude. I'm going to Glastonbury to have a great time, to hopefully meet all kinds of different people and would love nothing more than to spend all of the 5 days surrounded by great new friends, no matter what sex they are. However, there are a minority of idiots out there, like I explained in my earlier post, and as a 29 year old girl who is going to Glastonbury alone, despite the protestations of both many of the males and females I know about how it isn't safe and girls shouldn't be wandering around alone in the dark and such like, the existence of such a space, whether I actually use it or not, gives a little peace of mind to those who care about me and that is another reason why I think it's a good thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, eastynh said:

Fair enough mate. I am jumping out of here now and staying away from the political stuff. It is not my strong point and often what I am trying to get across gets lost in translation. 

If anyone wants a pint at the meet up and wants to pull me up on anything I have said then go for it. It is easier trying to speak in person rather than on the net.

 

@russycarps should be here telling you it used to be much more diverse before the fence and how he preferred it back in the day ;) 

I can certainly say that one of the years that the Happy Mondays played (someone else will have to clarify whether 1990 or 2000), it was pretty rammed and there was a blooming sizable working class proportion. 

None of that would make the slightest difference to the subject of this thread though and to be honest I'd say that there are plenty of families and a mixture of sexes now compared to then.

It's a huge site and they can do what they like with an area of it imho.

 

Edited by clarkete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...