Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2013-2014


Guest kaosmark2

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yep. I think there has been multiple issues in camps at major competitions over the last few decades. If memory serves me right there was a pretty major bust up in 2002 but I was preoccupied with one Roy Keane at the time and "Saipan"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And after announcing his departure back to the Dorset club, Burnley confirmed on their website (external) that Howe's exit was due to "personal and family reasons" but joint chairmen John Banaszkiewicz and Mike Garlick said they had not expected him to leave.

"We are surprised and disappointed that Eddie is leaving a great club like Burnley so soon in the season," a statement from the pair read.

"However, we understand that his decision reflects his personal circumstances rather than any matters at Burnley Football Club, be that supporters, the players or the board."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baresi, Maldini, Costacurta, Rijkaard, Van Basten. Hell of a team.

I did get to see Pep's Barca in the CL against Lyon in 2009.

Victor Valdés

Rafael Márquez

Gerard Piqué

Carles Puyol

Dani Alves

Yaya Touré

Sergio Busquets

Seydou Keita

Xavi

Thierry Henry

Samuel Eto'o

Lionel Messi

On paper that is just a staggering side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody can be sure how Giggs will do. I think it's just for United to see if he's worth the risk. It can't be any worse, that's for sure. I ain't sure how willing United will be to spend the sort of money they NEED to spend to back him though, and If they do give the money, is Giggs able to know how to spend it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Agree theres no gurantees for Man Utd but they should be in a group with the likes of other teams who haven't got guarantees eg Liverpool and Arsenal.

Liverpool have guaranteed Chumps footie. Arsenal are just about there with guaranteed Chumps qualie-rounds (and they'll go thru easy enough).

Meanwhile, Man Utd are guaranteed to be sat at home watching those other teams.

Only someone who won't get a kick at another club, who is after a mega pay-day, or a mega-fan of Utd, is going to choose Utd over the likes of Liverpool. If Liverpool don't make the Chumps for the 2015/16 season then if the player is good enough they'll get another move somewhere better.

I still think a prospective signing has a decision to make it courted by champions league Liverpool and non champions league man utd because at this stage nobody knows if Liverpool making top 4 and Man Utd missing out is a one off or signs of things to come.

And yet they can guarantee themselves a year to show themselves at CL level, or they can have no guarantees of anything at all.

C'mon, no fucker is that stupid, not even footballers. :lol:

A lot of players would still pick man u over Liverpool despite the lack of cl football, but that effect diminishes every year man utd miss out.

The only players who might do so are the players who couldn't see themselves getting a game elsewhere but would at Utd, who are after a big pay-day, or who are a mega Utd fan.

There is absolutely no reason to choose the team going nowhere (for a season, at least) otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
    • Definitely. UKIP also used Merkel welcoming 1 million Afgans to Europe in 2015 during the brexit vote.   Politicians in other countries within the EU know the are going to lose voters to parties to the right of them over stuff like this and they've no control over it.
    • I think it will very much vary on who there is to book who they know will sell out a day.    They’ve co-headline and full headline stuff in future, there no reason at all they won’t do it again, even if it means cutting someone’s set by 15 mins or having a band less in a big bands day…   They’re not going to not book Foo fighters and instead get the equivalent of Florence and C&S just to not have a band do a big set…   …unless of course they think it will make them more money…
    • Maybe some right wing leaders like Meloni are just playing to their base, like Reform have been here talking about them ending up at Calais.
    • Citizenship via investment programs basically work by saying if you invest this much in our economy (say buy a property worth x) then we will either grant you citizenship or residency with a route to it. The EU has rules on how low countries can set the bar. Montenegro was one of the easier ones to get and they've had to tighten it up.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...