Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2013 Lineup


Guest Dukeeyyy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • thetime

    1577

  • mrtourette

    1412

  • Mouseboy11

    1264

  • the wonderwhy

    1246

A bit off topic but had me thinking. I have just bought a ticket to Bilbao BBK due to the price of the tickets plus weather of festivals in this country (thinking of download and leeds 2011). Would this put any of you lot off going to a festival next year?

http://www.nme.com/n...festivals/67483

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"There's people there who will have headline before"

This might not necessarily allude to the headliners. It could be a band who once headlined, who have moved down.

Maybe The Prodigy, Pixies, The Darkness, Franz Ferdinand, Stereophonics, Primal Scream, Manic Street Preachers, The Charlatans and Garbage could all be taken into consideration.

Edited by VCK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

His got it into his head that an almost sold out arena tour rules them out completely.... I see where his coming from on that angle, but I'd say it's around 50/50. (If you think about festivals next year for the biff, they are really only to go Glasto (but was third in 2011...), TiTP and Reading/Leeds, so despite the arena tour a good chance to be steeping up headliner. (English Fest exclusive for Reading/Leeds and do TiTP).

Of course they could always just sub, but I think Festivals need a new "rock" band to headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you actually need it? SOAD have no uk dates what so ever so would be a uk exclusive - right up R&L street. Biffy Clyro have about 11 arena dates including 7 in england, yet to all completely sell out, 4 months before a festival that will have day tickets to see them at £85+ at two sites after people could get them for £34 to see them 4 months earlier.

Whereas if they sub, people have a £30 + band which did an arena tour, quite a cheap arena tour compared to some these days and a more expensive header on top.

IMO, if R&L were to get a band doing that many dates earlier in the year to headline a day, it needs to be someone who would charge a fair amount, say £50 for an arena date, hadn't played for a long time and were in demand so tickets would be picked up instant but also had the appeal to sell further ticket later with a days lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two people on this forum seem to have described Alt-J as a "Paolo Nutini rip-off." Now, I'm not a fan of either, by any stretch of the imagination, but I'm baffled as to what makes these two similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really starting to hope a SOAD and Sabbath headlined Reading. With a more mainstream act a the third. Even Mumford who I can't really stand at all. This would be a bold move by Melvin but a popular one. Heavier acts always get a better response and less complaints. Obviously we would need some of the less heavier acts as well but in general a heavier lineup is needed specially with what looks to be the absence of Sonisphere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...