Jump to content

The Dirty Independence Question

Kyelo

By Kyelo,
in Discussions

 Share

Recommended Posts

Neil Grand Master

Neil

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, LJS said:

If she dismissed self Id as meaningless why is your Tory government blocking it? With your support.

because its an unworkable  crock of shit that even its avocates don't agree with

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 15.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    6527

  • russycarps

    522

  • LJS

    4107

  • Comfy Bean

    1675

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

russycarps
russycarps

If they were voting for a Venezuelan style left wing revolution (for example) then none of the figures would matter a jot, and I'd say go for it and be green with envy. But all they are voting for

russycarps
russycarps

Finally crushed by the weight of her own  corruption. Exactly as I predicted several pages back (probably). I am here to offer my heartfelt condolences to LJS. It is never easy to lose a lover.

kaosmark2
kaosmark2

No, it's completely irrelevant. Scotland is a region of the UK, to select it as if Scotland is any more or less special than any other region suggests that there is something distinct. There isn't. Th

Posted Images

LJS Rising Star

LJS

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Neil said:

because its an unworkable  crock of shit that even its avocates don't agree with

...but works fine in loads of other places including Ireland.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LJS Rising Star

LJS

Posted
Posted
Just now, Neil said:

so sturgeon and scotlanda re inferior as they couldn't get it to work?

they couldn't get it to work because your bigoted Tory government blocked it. With your support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neil Grand Master

Neil

Posted
Posted
Just now, LJS said:

they couldn't get it to work because your bigoted Tory government blocked it. With your support.

it wasn't the tory govt who ignored a prisoner's self id @(tho they would have agreed with the sg about it!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LJS Rising Star

LJS

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Neil said:

it wasn't the tory govt who ignored a prisoner's self id @(tho they would have agreed with the sg about it!).

Absolutely nothing to do with the legislation in question. How could it be? It had been blocked by the Tories with your support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neil Grand Master

Neil

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LJS said:

Absolutely nothing to do with the legislation in question. How could it be? It had been blocked by the Tories with your support.

the SG went against   the legislation as it disrespected the prisioner's choice of gender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LJS Rising Star

LJS

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Neil said:

the SG went against   the legislation as it disrespected the prisioner's choice of gender.

It went against the legislation which wasn't law? And which we would not have required that criminal to be placed in a women's jail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Neil Grand Master

Neil

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, zahidf said:

Sturgeons husband has been arrested

He's been got for the missing money, funny how the police act once sturgeon doesn't own them.

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kurosagi Proficient

Kurosagi

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, Neil said:

He's been got for the missing money, funny how the police act once sturgeon doesn't own them.

WoS will be munching on the popcorn with a smile on his face today, vindicated for having broken the story 3 years ago only to endure years of abuse from SNP members blindly protective of Sturgeon, a compliant Scottish media wanting to brush the story under the carpet...oh and Scotland's Chief of Police mysteriously resigning a week after Sturgeon...

https://wingsoverscotland.com/lipstick-on-your-collar/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LJS Rising Star

LJS

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Kurosagi said:

WoS will be munching on the popcorn with a smile on his face today, vindicated for having broken the story 3 years ago only to endure years of abuse from SNP members blindly protective of Sturgeon, a compliant Scottish media wanting to brush the story under the carpet...oh and Scotland's Chief of Police mysteriously resigning a week after Sturgeon...

https://wingsoverscotland.com/lipstick-on-your-collar/

Has he been tried and found guilty? Or even charged?

I must have missed that bit.

 

p.s. wings is a bigoted transphobe. If he was right about the money, that does not alter that.

Edited by LJS
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kurosagi Proficient

Kurosagi

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LJS said:

Has he been tried and found guilty? Or even charged?

I must have missed that bit.

You clearly missed the bit at the very beginning of the article...I'll quote it for you:

"So let’s remind ourselves of a few things. Firstly is that Peter Murrell is entitled to the presumption of innocence like any other suspect..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Neil Grand Master

Neil

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, LJS said:

Has he been tried and found guilty? Or even charged?

The money is missing and he's failed to give a satisfactory answer. Looks like conviction is coming,same as it did for plenty of other prominent snp people. Hands in the till seems to be an affliction of Scottish nationalism. Reckon there could be an interesting theory for why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LJS Rising Star

LJS

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Kurosagi said:

You clearly missed the bit at the very beginning of the article...I'll quote it for you:

"So let’s remind ourselves of a few things. Firstly is that Peter Murrell is entitled to the presumption of innocence like any other suspect..."

I didn't read the article (nor shall I) I read and replied to your post where you said the Bishop of Bath had been "vindicated"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kurosagi Proficient

Kurosagi

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LJS said:

I didn't read the article (nor shall I) I read and replied to your post where you said the Bishop of Bath had been "vindicated"

"vindicated" as in having done a bit of journalism that has been seen as worthy of a major police investigation resulting in an arrest. I'd have thought that was a pretty bang on use of the word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LJS Rising Star

LJS

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Kurosagi said:

"vindicated" as in having done a bit of journalism that has been seen as worthy of a major police investigation resulting in an arrest. I'd have thought that was a pretty bang on use of the word.

Please accept my apologies if I misinterpreted what you said.

It seemed to me that you had made your mind up.

Glad to hear you still have an open mind.

🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kurosagi Proficient

Kurosagi

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, LJS said:

Please accept my apologies if I misinterpreted what you said.

It seemed to me that you had made your mind up.

Glad to hear you still have an open mind.

Due process of law and justice and all that.

I'm not a fan of corruption regardless of which party is trying to pull the wool over the eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...