Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2011-2012


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    1469

  • The Nal

    1095

  • kaosmark2

    1095

  • strummer77

    896

His kick out at the Leeds player after he lost the ball was a ''class act'' was it?

I respect Henry's talent but I hate his arrogant,self-serving attitude.I read that he has become more humble and thought of himself more as a team player rather than an individual these days yet I still saw him being petulent when balls weren't given to him and kick out at that Leeds lad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Kompany gets four game ban....

Football is such a pussy sport these days if that is deemed serious foul play.

that's fucking outrageous.

I can't see how the Rodwell red card against Liverpool was over-turned but this one wasn't. They were quite similar, but the Kompany one was less 'dangerous play' because there was less of any foot up and wasn't a lunge towards a player.

Presumably the FA didn't want to upset their star England player by showing that he got it wrong. Or maybe there was a manager they didn't want to upset who suggested his star player didn't get it wrong.

What's the point of the appeal process when there's no consistency to it? :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Good, glad they upheld the red card.

He was a split second away from ending a career with a challenge like that. He may not have, and he may have even got the ball, these things don't matter when you dive in 2-footed with studs showing.

'split second'??? c'mon!!!

He'd got the ball clear long before Nani arrived. The fact that Nani didn't think it could have been pretended as a foul gets to show it was never a foul.

If that was a red then every kick at the ball is a red, because another player might come and lie down somewhere near that kicking player's studs sometime in the next twenty minutes.

It was less of a red than the Rodwell red that was recinded.

C'mon - fess up. You're only pleased because it makes the win against City a legitimate win and not handed to you on a plate by the ref.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Disgraceful decision. It's the same as the Rodwell challenge. I understand the ref making the decision initially, but that's disgraceful inconsistency.

yep, that's pretty much how I see it too - tho I'd say there was more about the Rodwell challenge that could have deemed it dangerous than there was with this one, so if the Rodwell one wasn't a deserved red then this one couldn't have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hughes at QPR. Seems a bit odd to me, he left Fulham because of their supposed lack of ambition, but QPR aren't going to be giving him stupid money to spend, and are a lot further away than Fulham from the top atm. I mean, Fulham could make a reasonable attempt at a cup every season, occassionally the Europa League, QPR are hoping to remain in the Prem and possibly build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

More anti united nonsense! Your beginning to look very silly.

both parts are anti-FA, and not anti Utd. :rolleyes:

What's silly is you believing that any comment that mentions Utd which isn't full of glowing praise is driven by a hatred of Utd.

Or are refs only perfection when they ref a Utd match (tho only when they make decisions in Utd's favour of course :lol:), and the FA only perfection when considering an appeal (tho only when they make decisions in Utd's favour of course :lol:).

It wasn't a red. It can't have been a red if Rodwell's wasn't a red. Utd fans with an IQ in excess of 70 have realised it wasn't a red.

Grow up FFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Rodwell was a bit different in its nature (a bit less two footed) but probably had the same level of "danger"... So I agree... Lack of consistency there...

Nope - Rodwell's WAS two footed; both his feet with studs up made contact with Suarez ... tho only very lightly.

There was no studs-up contact made with Nani (it would have been hard to have that contact, Nani was 5 yards away at the time), and only one of Kompany's boots was studs up (but as low to the ground as it was possible to be, not 6 inches up in the air as it was with Rodwell).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Hughes at QPR. Seems a bit odd to me, he left Fulham because of their supposed lack of ambition, but QPR aren't going to be giving him stupid money to spend, and are a lot further away than Fulham from the top atm. I mean, Fulham could make a reasonable attempt at a cup every season, occassionally the Europa League, QPR are hoping to remain in the Prem and possibly build.

perhaps he thinks that Tony will open his wallet more easily that Fayed would?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'split second'??? c'mon!!!

He'd got the ball clear long before Nani arrived. The fact that Nani didn't think it could have been pretended as a foul gets to show it was never a foul.

If that was a red then every kick at the ball is a red, because another player might come and lie down somewhere near that kicking player's studs sometime in the next twenty minutes.

It was less of a red than the Rodwell red that was recinded.

C'mon - fess up. You're only pleased because it makes the win against City a legitimate win and not handed to you on a plate by the ref.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • It was great, but I don't know why they continue to play Wide Lovely Eyes and Rings of Saturn, which are the weakest of the tracks off both PTSA and ST. Well, I do. It's cos they're about Suzie, so he can sing what he wants. They're the low points of the set. The rest is ace.
    • I didn't this time, but I've seen them before and just because you saw both that night doesn’t mean you can compare them. The Stones were great, but.you didn't think so and you went somewhere else looking for a good time and you found it. For whatever reason you didn't like it, but you were an outlier and all the reviews said they were great.
    • Annie Lennox could be the one to unite the whole forum, nobody has a bad word to say about her, even noted curmudgeon Skip 😄 I'd probably even amble along for a bit meself, and i'm also a miserable sod 
    • If the below link works - thats interesting.   While I don't particularly put much stock in that account as a source (never seen it before though, tbf), and I can pick a hole or two (see below) in what he says - the timing of it is a week before I had the Fontaines '27 stadium info (same stadium he says on there, Tottenham). The info, or part of it, matches up.   Holes I'd pick: I'd have to watch again but I THINK he says 'end of year' for Tottenham - not possible, for a number of reasons, though he's probably just got his words mixed up there. It's Summer '27, or that's what I've been told. He also says Glastonbury is/would be based on how the album does. That doesn't stack up to me, unless it was a 2028 thing. I suppose that could stack up, i.e a verbal agreement for 2028, but still seems a bit of an odd approach. I would personally still expect it to be 2027 alongside the stadium gigs, IF they are gonna do it, though I've still not got a Scooby when the album is gonna drop, only that the tour is due for Spring (or early) next year.   Interesting, nonetheless.   https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaOB3Q9qkwW/
    • I was hoping that they would just do a tour like they were set to in 2020, rather than having Download as their UK appearance. If they are at DL, I would be surprised to see them headline. I think they sub under Deftones or SOAD 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...