Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2013 Headliners


Guest shangri-la_steward

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 11.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

he tries, although sometimes not with the best results haha, when he does sing he has a backing track to back him up, or is auto-tuned.

check out this footage from coachella: he always dedicates this song to his deceased mother:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wham is music for people with no interest in music or culture. Morons basically. People who think Friends is the greatest TV show ever. The same people who paid for the Crazy Frog ringtone, say "simples" a lot and laugh after, who whistle the "Go Compare" song from the ad and still do the "whassaaapp" thing from the Budwesier ad when they answer the phone and think it hilarious.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woah has everyone been sniffing glue... mentioning Kanye to headline is a laugh but plausible but Wham! come on lets give our heads a shake and get some realism back here...

The festival would not go from U2, Coldplay, Beyonce to possibly (worse case no stones) Arctic Monkeys, Mumford and Sons, Wham!

:banghead: if Wham! headline you might as well let Steps headline the Saturday instead of the Stones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically what I'm getting at is there something inherently "cheesy" about Glastonbury. Its never professed to be some kind überhip lightningrod. Theres been a broadminded populism to their bookings for years. Particularly on the main stage. I don't particularly like it when they try to change this dynamic quite honestly.

Scoffing at George Michael playing Glastonbury is bizarre. Puts you in the same anachronistic liferaft that that ape Noel Gallagher was in prior to JayZ's appearance.

Let the festival book something different and comment afterwards. None of us know what it could be like. I've stated that Neil Diamond was gawd awful on here many times - yet there were 60K at that show. People loved it. The hordes turned up their collective noses at Robbie Williams but his appearance at Glasters saved his fucking career.

Give the rockism a rest lads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as bad as his singing is, id much prefer it over his auto-tune. he released a whole album worth of auto-tuned singing which i still think is his poorest release by miles. want some more footage to slate? check this out:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've neither preference nor control either way folks. I just don't like seeing naked rockism. Thus my defence of Wham or George playing, either as headliner or first on in the bandstand.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woah has everyone been sniffing glue... mentioning Kanye to headline is a laugh but plausible but Wham! come on lets give our heads a shake and get some realism back here...

The festival would not go from U2, Coldplay, Beyonce to possibly (worse case no stones) Arctic Monkeys, Mumford and Sons, Wham!

:banghead: if Wham! headline you might as well let Steps headline the Saturday instead of the Stones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dislike of him is nothing to do with him not being rock... I'd be happy with Joanna Newsom, Feist, Reggie Watts, Hidden Orchestra, any number of non rock acts. In fact rock comes fairly low on my listening priorities these days
Link to comment
Share on other sites

George Michael's got some tunes. Would it not be similar to Rod Stewart headlining? Whether you think it was a good idea or not, it happened.

I personally think he'd be a weak headliner marketing wise, as somebody already said, he's not incredibly popular with many under thirty.

His cache would've risen tenfold had he just performed Freedom '90 at the Olympics and not ruined whatever mood that there wasn't by playing that interminable new single as well. Hopefully if he's booked it won't be as a headliner and he'll have the promotional wherewithal to perform a Greatest Hits set and remind the crowd how many tunes they actually know. If he plays, I call sub-headliner a la Scissor Sisters.

Edited by tylerdurden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

that album has grown on me with time but yeah, definitely a big misstep in his career. all the power to him for doing it though. most artists wouldn't consider such a possible career suicide move but good ol' Kanye just does what he does

think he still plays a couple of songs from that album live and they're widely regarded as the low points of the set - time to go for a piss or get yourself a pint etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

George Michael's got some tunes. Would it not be similar to Rod Stewart headlining? Whether you think it was a good idea or not, it happened.
Edited by tonyblair
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I stand by my opinion on Wham. Awful. The sort of low budget entertainment you'd see at in a cheap Spanish resort at best.

Being happy to see them headline Glastonbury is absolutely crazy.

"Sorry pal can't make your stag I got a ticket for Glastonbury"

"Ah Jesus no probs mate. Glasto is unmissable in fairness, no bother. Who's headlining by the way?"

"Wham".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Maybe you need a groovy mayor who can get you the money.   Anyway, looks like mayors going to get a whole load of fiscal devolution and greater powers...so best everyone gets one, a decent one, and get a load of Madchesterism.  
    • Basement Jaxx 110  Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 130 David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 110 Faithless 75  Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130  Garbage 120  GOAT 85  Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 125 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 120  Nile Rodgers & Chic 140 +10 The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 100 Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 140  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 100 Underworld 150 MAX Wilco 40  Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • Another great weekend with family and friends.  We spend most of our time between Obelisk, and second stage due to having young children.  Overpass, Florence Road, Nathan Evans, David Byrne and Alex James were the highlights for me.  Quite enjoyed a dance to Gok Wan on the Saturday too.   Certainly feeling the Latitude blues this week and looking forward to next year.   Also looking forward to all the predictions for next year in the 2027 chat.   Hope everyone had a great festival.    
    • How much is Burnham's success down to Manchester getting a shitton of investment for public transport infrastructure?   There's no doubt he did the work, but the money dumped into Manchester for him to achieve that was huge - the most of any infrastructure project outside London ever. Did that need a mayor, or just the money?
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...