Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2010-2011


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    2125

  • ampersand

    1135

  • The Nal

    1089

  • TheGayTent

    766

  • Admin

So what? That's allowed. What isn't allowed is bringing someone down by putting an arm across them.

The pair of you are justifying cheating by accepting it as part of the game.

No, it's you not knowing what cheating is, because you don't knows the rules.

I'm wetting myself with laughter. :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pedantic rubbish. They were jostling. It's a physical sport.

I can't be arsed with the inevitable semantic crap about his intention, which the rule hinges upon. His intention was not to bring him down and he didn't bring him down. His intention was to fight for the ball and Suarez dived. It would appear that the authories agree too.

He is shit though, I'll give you that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

It's a physical sport.

I can't be arsed with the inevitable semantic crap about his intention, which the rule hinges upon.

you need to read the rules rather than pretend you know them.

His intention was not to bring him down and he didn't bring him down.

do you have an MA in Mindreading too? Presumably it's a double first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Do you see the irony?

Which part of ''I can't be arsed with the inevitable semantic crap about his intention'' do you not understand?

If you actually knew the rules, then the question of intention - and any "inevitable semantic crap" - does not arise. :lol:

The failing here is all your own making, as a result of your own ignorance and your false belief in your own knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder what Phil has to say...

Blackburn have confirmed the signing of Myles Anderson from Aberdeen in the summer. Not heard of him? Most people haven't.

Myles Anderson is the son of football agent Jerome Anderson. Not heard of him? Most people haven't.

Jerome Anderson is the man responsible for the Venky takeover of Blackburn.

Jerome Anderson is said to have a massive control over the way Blackburn is been run.

Jerome Anderson is said to have been responsible for the sacking of Sam Allardyce as Big Sam wasn't prepared to sign players attached to Jerome Anderson's company.

Jerome Anderson was given responsibility for finding Big Sam's replacement.

Have a wild, stab in the dark, guess who is also a client of Jerome Anderson...

Yup, Steve Keen...

Who coincidentally confimed the signing of Jerome Anderson's son today. A player who has struggled everywhere he has been and who Aberdeen feel isn't good enough to warrant a new contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

:lol: @ that Blackburn thing.

I see Gareth Bale is crocked yet again, and out of Saturday's match. And probably some more Spurs games too I guess.

And Ramsay has been named as Wales captain. I'm not entirely sure that having a 20 year old captain without a huge amount of top-level experience (even if that's been the result of injury and not non-selection) is a great idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wales are gash. robbie savage said wales losing bale is like england playing without a keeper. will probably be a big score at the weekend if england play like they can.

anyone headed to the emirates to see us pump brazil?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wales are gash. robbie savage said wales losing bale is like england playing without a keeper. will probably be a big score at the weekend if england play like they can.

anyone headed to the emirates to see us pump brazil?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

The hope is that the future may be brighter.

without meaning to be harsh, I doubt it.

Wales qualifying in 1958 often gets mentioned as a way of demonstrating that it might happen again, but .... Wales didn't really qualify that year. I can't remember the details now but Wales essentially got a bye into the finals because of some issue around a couple of other countries (I think it involved Israel).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

without meaning to be harsh, I doubt it.

Wales qualifying in 1958 often gets mentioned as a way of demonstrating that it might happen again, but .... Wales didn't really qualify that year. I can't remember the details now but Wales essentially got a bye into the finals because of some issue around a couple of other countries (I think it involved Israel).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

without meaning to be harsh, I doubt it.

Wales qualifying in 1958 often gets mentioned as a way of demonstrating that it might happen again, but .... Wales didn't really qualify that year. I can't remember the details now but Wales essentially got a bye into the finals because of some issue around a couple of other countries (I think it involved Israel).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I've never heard that before and just did a quick google search and found this...

"Aside from the main European zone matches, Wales, which finished second in its group behind Czechoslovakia, was drawn into a play-off with Israel after Israel won its group by default because its three opponents, Turkey, Indonesia and Sudan, refused to play. FIFA had imposed a rule that no team would qualify without playing at least one match, something that had happened in several previous World Cups. Wales won the play-off and qualified."

That's very probably the way it happened - but I think it's the case that Israel were a completely useless team at the time, so it was almost like playing no-one.

I've certainly read stuff that was saying that if they'd not been that situation then Wales wouldn't have had a hope of qualifying for the '58 finals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's very probably the way it happened - but I think it's the case that Israel were a completely useless team at the time, so it was almost like playing no-one.

I've certainly read stuff that was saying that if they'd not been that situation then Wales wouldn't have had a hope of qualifying for the '58 finals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...