Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

General News Discussion


Guest Atlanteanlost

Recommended Posts

  • Admin

Its shocking how police can name a suspect without even charging him, I dont agree with people being named unless found guilty.

If they release this guy without charging him how will he be perceived by the general public?

Yup. If they're so certain they've got the right guy - and they've as good as said they have - then it's a bit weird that they're not finding the kid.

Also, the car in the first appeal for witnesses was "light coloured", and his is dark blue.

And from the sounds of things the old bill sound like they know this guy has an 'unhealthy' interest in kids, but from other things that are being reported it sounds like he's not someone with a conviction for anything like that.

I'm wondering if he's been arrested on the same basis as the landlord was for that Bristol murder a year or two back - that one or more people have decided he's a bit weird, and so he must be guilty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

In this case the police didn't name him, he was "named locally" according to the BBC, which means that reporters were told by people on the street/neighbours who knew it was him who was arrested. I agree 100% that this is wrong and once again point to the Jo Yates case for an example of why naming suspects or making accusations of previous behaviour outside of direct police charges or, more importantly, a courtroom conviction, is both dangerous and wrong.

Our media has become a pantomime in the world of 24 hour news, in the lack of any new information for a clamouring public they resort to speculation, which then becomes embedded in the public mind as fact, right up until (and sometimes beyond) the moment it is proven otherwise.

I hope that this is something that Leveson will highlight and seek to control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup. If they're so certain they've got the right guy - and they've as good as said they have - then it's a bit weird that they're not finding the kid.

Also, the car in the first appeal for witnesses was "light coloured", and his is dark blue.

And from the sounds of things the old bill sound like they know this guy has an 'unhealthy' interest in kids, but from other things that are being reported it sounds like he's not someone with a conviction for anything like that.

I'm wondering if he's been arrested on the same basis as the landlord was for that Bristol murder a year or two back - that one or more people have decided he's a bit weird, and so he must be guilty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this case the police didn't name him, he was "named locally" according to the BBC, which means that reporters were told by people on the street/neighbours who knew it was him who was arrested. I agree 100% that this is wrong and once again point to the Jo Yates case for an example of why naming suspects or making accusations of previous behaviour outside of direct police charges or, more importantly, a courtroom conviction, is both dangerous and wrong.

Our media has become a pantomime in the world of 24 hour news, in the lack of any new information for a clamouring public they resort to speculation, which then becomes embedded in the public mind as fact, right up until (and sometimes beyond) the moment it is proven otherwise.

I hope that this is something that Leveson will highlight and seek to control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I dont think it is that weird. Unless they have forensic evidence in the car he may think that no kid no case, or a living kid can tell them more about a dead kid (if guilty).

possible, but it's more unusual than usual for a perpetrator to keep it zipped in a case like this once they've been arrested.

As for any evidence from the car, the guy has been said by at least one newspaper to be "a family friend", and on TV last night or this morning I heard a report that his kid and the missing girl play regularly together - which gets to mean that there might be a perfectly reasonable explanation for why her DNA might be found in his car.

Roll out the statutory person saying "he is a bit of a loner".

yeah, i've seen comments like that.

Having occasionally lived in small towns and villages, I know how the small town mindset often works - and being fair and reasonable doesn't get to apply all the time. If you won't deliberately mix with the locals then there's a decent chance of being labelled the local weirdo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going to be the mother of police cockups if it's not him.

They obviously think its definitely him. They said today they're not looking for anyone else. They've released name and picture to help the investigation. They've effectively thrown all their eggs into this basket.

If it is him then you have to think the chances of finding her alive are very very slim. If its not him then the investigation is screwed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

It's going to be the mother of police cockups if it's not him.

They obviously think its definitely him. They said today they're not looking for anyone else. They've released name and picture to help the investigation. They've effectively thrown all their eggs into this basket.

If it is him then you have to think the chances of finding her alive are very very slim. If its not him then the investigation is screwed

It's defo going to be the mother of police cockups if it's not him. That's what worries me.

It wouldn't be the first time that the old bill have fucked up an investigation by going with their prejudices rather than any facts, but thankfully such cases are far fewer than they were in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/323-glastonbury-scouse-satanists-psycho-seagulls/id1042636893?i=1000567612926
    • Not my experience. I've always got the size I paid for.
    • Kind of crackers how fast this summer seems to be sailing by. But aye, must be some news soon! 
    • I am very possibly wrong about this but I do think that the pitch you get allocated appears to be related to your time of arrival, (i.e. you get the next one available) rather than the price you paid for a small, medium or large pitch.  They all appear to be the same size to me.
    • MINUS MONDAY Basement Jaxx 120  Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 140 CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 120  David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 75  Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130  Garbage 125 GOAT 70 (-10) Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 125 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 120  Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 80 Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 140  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 100 Underworld 150 MAX Wilco 30 Wolf Alice 150 MAX
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...