Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2026


#1SzigetFan

Recommended Posts

Counting down the days, what are your daily plans? 

 

I will be there for day 1 and 2, the first time after 2023. 

Have to say I'm quite unhappy with the running order, a lot of clashes with staff i would like to see. 

 

Day1: Probably won't be early enough for Bad Nerves, so I will start a day with Wolf Alice and might go to Zara Larsson, but would have to skip Lambrini Girls and Avrelize for that. I don't know yet, hard one to choose. 

But in that case i might skip Sombr for heavy riffs with Kim Dracula and later Underworld for desert.

Day2: Will try to catch Giant Rooks followed by Biffy Clyro. With change of their spot, theys clash with Natasha Bedingfield and Health. Another pain in the ass moment for me. Will choose Twenty One Pilots over Chet Faker and will check out Ashnikko and Tomora and maybe even Argy for the end. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, billybigballs said:

Without reawakening the old Skrillex debate, that Saturday is the worst line-up of any festival day I have ever attended. Main stage especially. I can usually find some good in a line-up, even if it's not to my taste, but at the moment we plan to possibly see Zimmer 90 and then decide if we can be arsed to hang around until 2manyDJs play about six hours later!  

You clearly weren't there last year for the The Kooks + Kid Cudi day lol

 

But yeah, ain't brilliant. On the bright side: I don't have to budget energy so much because after day 3 is over I can basically lay back and chill most of the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Yelo, the Parmiggiana said:

You clearly weren't there last year for the The Kooks + Kid Cudi day lol

 

But yeah, ain't brilliant. On the bright side: I don't have to budget energy so much because after day 3 is over I can basically lay back and chill most of the time

 

Kid cudi day was decent day i thought. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

8 hours ago, activean said:

Counting down the days, what are your daily plans? 

 

 


Managed to go crazy again, will prolly skip some, but that’s my current plan. Maybe gives some of you some ideas. 
will try to catch luminarium, traveling funfair and all the rest as well in between. 

 

 

MONDAY

21.30 - 23.00 Faithless (Main Stage)

 

TUESDAY

15.00 - 15.30 manoAmano: KINEMATOS (Cirque du Sziget)

17.30 - 18.30 Wolf Alice (Main Stage)

18.30 - 18.45 Flag Party (Main Stage)

20.00 - 20.45 Siegfried & Joy (The Joker)

21.30 - 22.45 sombr (Main Stage) 

23.00 - 00.00 East London Strippers Collective: Ask A Stripper (The Joker)

01.30 - 03.00 Underworld (Revolut)

 

WEDNESDAY

13.00 - 14.00 Boglarka Börcsök & Andreas Bolm: Figuring Age (Le DOME)

19.15 - 20.30 Biffy Clyro (Main Stage)

21.15 - 22.50 Twenty One Pilots (Main Stage)

23.00 - 00.00 Recirquel: Liberty Love Rave (Le Grand Theatre)

01.30 - 03.30 Yousuke Yukimatsu (Colosseum)

 

THURSDAY

14.30 - 15.30 Alen Nsambu: Neon Beige (Magic Mirror) 

16.30 - 17.30 Black Country, New Road (Revolut)

17.30 - 18.30 Loyle Carner (Main Stage)

18.30 - 19.30 Teen Mortgage (The Buzz)

21.15 - 22.45 Florence + The Machine (Main Stage)

23.30 - 00.30 Koven (Der Klub)

00.40 - 01.40 Night Tapes (The Buzz)

 

FRIDAY

13.00 - 14.00 Mate Meszzaros, Andras Szombathy, Patrik Keresztes, Abris Gryllus: Pitch Black River (Le Dome)

16.05 - 16.45 Sodakill (Light Stage)

17.30 - 18.30 Sigrid (Main Stage)

19.15 - 20.30 Skepta (Main Stage)

21.30 - 23.00 Bring Me The Horizon (Main Stage)

23.45 - 01.00 Nia Archives (Revolut)

 

SATURDAY

15.00 - 15.30 SUB.LAB.PRO - Valenting Alfery: Slow Burner (Mobilis)

16.00 - 16.30 Ahmed Ayed:  …and nobody else (Mobilis) 

17.15 - 18.15 All Star Exhibition Dance Battle (The Cypher)

18.30 - 19.30 Stand-Up Comedy (The Joker)

20.00 - 21.00 Oli Mathiesen with Lucy Lynch and Sharvon Mortimer: The Butterfly Who Flew Into The Rave (Le Dome)

23.00 - 23.50 ZEP (dropYard)

00.00 - 01.15 Soulwax (Revolut)

01.45 - 03.00 Dimension (Bolt Night Stage)

Edited by eyebrain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, billybigballs said:

Is anything said we need to be aware of?

They built a watering system and have been watering the island for the past few weeks to reduce dust, but given the current drought, there will still be dust.

They will cover twice as much ground around the main stage with those plastic panels as they did before.

They couldn't book Gogol Bordello because the singer was afraid the government would allow Russian security services to capture him if he entered the country.

They didn't have much room to be selective about artists. They booked whoever they could get.

This year's Sziget will be only about 50% of his original vision. He wanted a dedicated rock stage.

They are preparing for a loss of 1.5 billion HUF this year.

For some reason, student tickets are not selling in the numbers they had expected.

He said that when he talks about the lineup being less important, he doesn't mean Sziget should have a weaker lineup than Primavera. Rather, it should have a similarly strong lineup combined with much more non-musical programming, so people from abroad come here to see the same artists but have a completely different overall experience.

He didn't miss Sziget and originally wanted to spend no more than two days a week dealing with it, but now he's working on it full-time and has handed over control of the rest of his businesses.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bródy Day was his idea because Sziget has always been late when it comes to this kind of concert. They would only organize farewell performances or tribute shows after an artist had passed away. Since Bródy is one of the country's greatest singer-songwriters, they wanted to honor him while he is still alive. (He didn't say it exactly like that, but the man is 80 and has just stopped playing large concerts.)

He never understood why anyone would focus exclusively on one generation, especially Gen Z, who have less disposable income, drink less, and are, in his words, "afraid of partying." He explained that in the past, people loved festivals because of the nonstop partying, whereas many younger people today find that experience overwhelming or exhausting. That's one of the reasons why Sziget will introduce more chill zones and sensory-friendly spaces.

They also want to attract older generations, who are generally more willing and able to spend money. The Sziget Icons days are aimed at this audience, and in the future they hope to create a more balanced lineup that appeals to people over 35 as well.

 

It was a long interview. If anything else comes to mind, I'll share it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, activean said:

Do we think there is realistic chance Sziget could get cancelled? I'm reading about Hungarian energy crysis and many measures and prohibitions due to this. 

 

They relesed a statement and comment section is on fire.. 

would you be able to post the statement? I can’t seem to find it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they are shutting down the nuclear power plant until Friday ; sziget starts 3 days later

plus, they said they will have to import energy. 

 

So I see no point in cancelling an event that will make them lose money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, bunnyv said:

My fellow Hungarians always find a reason why Sziget should be cancelled every single years Now it’s at least a bit valid but I would say it’s highly unlikely.

This. I always read in awe the hatred toward the festival and Gerendai. 

I see no chance of it being cancelled, except if something worse happens, like the whole electric grid collapses or something. But that’s not really a case. Worst case scenario is that the whole thing will be ran by diesel generators for the sake of the environment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chill.

There is no chance Sziget will be cancelled by the government.
Even the prime minister held a press conference today, where he confirmed this.
 

Magyar said they do not want to shut down the country or prevent events from taking place. He gave the example that vetoing an event would be like completely cutting off a large consumer’s electricity supply for the organizers. However, just as they have not taken such a measure against large consumers, they have not taken steps to cancel events either. (Magyar did not name a specific event, but he was presumably referring specifically to the Sziget Festival.)

At the same time, Péter Magyar stressed that if disruptions occur in the system or the heatwave persists, it could become necessary to postpone or reschedule events (example: some Hungarian football games will probably be held in daylight, moved to a few hours earlier, to save energy), although he believes there is currently little chance of that happening. This is particularly true for events that rely entirely, or largely, on their own energy sources.

Edited by kristofm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CCester said:

I saw this just after it was posted yesterday, I barely paid attention to it. I didn't realise it had blown up in the way it has. I'm sure (kind of) that Sziget will be unaffected - it brings in billions of huf over a very short period. Its consumption, compared to the rest of Budapest, will be tiny in reality. That said, nothing wrong with encouraging people to use less energy whether it's now or in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...