Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2025


#1SzigetFan

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, BobMahelp said:

So last year we had nine headliners

 

Wednesday - Kylie

Thursday - Halsey

Friday - Stormzy/Liam Gallagher

Saturday - Martin Garrix

Sunday - Janelle Monae/Sam Smith

Monday - Skrillex/Fred Again

 

So that’s roughly split into 3 dance acts, 3 commercial pop, 2 RNB/Hip hop and 1 indie/rock

 

My guess is:

 

Wednesday - Charli XCX

Thursday - Central Cee/Tiësto

Friday - Post Malone

Saturday - Hozier/Anyma

Sunday - Queens of the Stone Age/Fatboy Slim

Monday - Chappell Roan

We already have Armin van Buuren and Nelly Furtado, and whats up with Shawn Mendes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, billybigballs said:

Who do we think, of the acts announced, are subs?

 

Nelly Furtado, Justice and Papa Roach?

 

If so, we're still waiting on (at least) three more headliners and three subs?

 

Justice as sub, during daylight would be ass. Their light show adds massively to the experience. I much rather sufficate in the tent and get the full experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, BobMahelp said:

So last year we had nine headliners

 

Wednesday - Kylie

Thursday - Halsey

Friday - Stormzy/Liam Gallagher

Saturday - Martin Garrix

Sunday - Janelle Monae/Sam Smith

Monday - Skrillex/Fred Again

 

So that’s roughly split into 3 dance acts, 3 commercial pop, 2 RNB/Hip hop and 1 indie/rock

 

My guess is:

 

Wednesday - Charli XCX

Thursday - Central Cee/Tiësto

Friday - Post Malone

Saturday - Hozier/Anyma

Sunday - Queens of the Stone Age/Fatboy Slim

Monday - Chappell Roan

 

Chappell Roan is big enough to close the festival by herself the last day ? I was thinking she could be co-headlining with someone bigger but it's only thought 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Akujin said:

 

Justice as sub, during daylight would be ass. Their light show adds massively to the experience. I much rather sufficate in the tent and get the full experience.

 

If, indeed, the tent even exists in 2025.

 

One thing Latitude festival here in the UK has done previously is to start the headliner at 8pm with a finish around 9.30pm and then have an EDM set for an hour between 10pm and 11pm - but that act isn't classed as the headliner.

 

They did it with Stereophonics followed by Underworld a few years ago and are doing it again in 2025 with Sting followed by Basement Jaxx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, billybigballs said:

Who do we think, of the acts announced, are subs?

 

Nelly Furtado, Justice and Papa Roach?

 

If so, we're still waiting on (at least) three more headliners and three subs?

I would go for Nelly, Armin and Papa Roach. Justice maybe if they don't headline revolut stage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, djym12 said:

I would go for Nelly, Armin and Papa Roach. Justice maybe if they don't headline revolut stage

Absolutely blows my mind that a festival the size of Sziget would consider Papa Roach to be suitable to be a sub. Have they been more successful in mainland europe than the UK?

 

Just checked and they've had three Top 40 singles in the UK, the last of which was almost 23 years ago.

 

Their last album got to number 36, five years ago.

 

Edited by So Sad Simon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, So Sad Simon said:

Absolutely blows my mind that a festival the size of Sziget would consider Papa Roach to be suitable to be a sub. Have they been more successful in mainland europe than the UK?

 

Just checked and they've had three Top 40 singles in the UK, the last of which was almost 23 years ago.

Their 2 last albums have good publicity in press, and are more "main public".

 

Try singles like " not the only one", "apologies" or the last one , "leave a light on", you'll understand immediately 😉 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Matt86 said:

Their 2 last albums have good publicity in press, and are more "main public".

 

Try singles like " not the only one", "apologies" or the last one , "leave a light on", you'll understand immediately 😉 

I agree, Papa Roach still puts out new music that is good. They won't be a "headliner" but would be a great sub for "Rock" day on the Main State. Check out their set from Resurrection Fest in 2023 in Spain. They were subs there, too, but they put on a great show: 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Akujin said:

 

Justice as sub, during daylight would be ass. Their light show adds massively to the experience. I much rather sufficate in the tent and get the full experience.

I hear they bring the party. They are a good booking, hope they get the set time/place they deserve. Definitely on my list to check out....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Newjem said:

Better than expected? What did you expect... riots? I don't see any positive feedback tbh.


I see waaaay more positivity online compared to last year. People are going mad for all three headliners. And there js even excitement for Nelly And Armin. I think so far they are bang on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Akujin said:


I see waaaay more positivity online compared to last year. People are going mad for all three headliners. And there js even excitement for Nelly And Armin. I think so far they are bang on.

Not sure I’ve been seeing the same reactions. The headliners are quite strong, but only if you like pop and EDM.

 

the undercard is really weak and I haven’t seen anyone saying otherwise elsewhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no patiens screenshoting rhe overwhelmingly positive comments, but I am a f**king nerd so I tallied the positive and negative emojies in both first announcememts (fb since Instagram does not have this feature). 
 

last year 1.4k reactions, 18% negative

this year 514 reactions, 10% negative

 

Now there are far less reactions (could be down to algorithm or the fact that I can’t remember that last tear we also had a video announcement first?

 

But either way my point stands, reactions are looking better this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...