Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, tigger123 said:

The only reason I say that is because Robbie is touring this year and around at exactly the time of Glasto, yet has ruled himself out via exclusivity at IoW. We don't know what GnR's plans are currently, so yes what I have said, today, is currently accurate. So on current weight of evidence, it is more likely GnR do it than Robbie

Kate Bush hasn’t said no either. So by that logic she is just as likely as GnR.

(neither is remotely likely)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Kate Bush hasn’t said no either. So by that logic she is just as likely as GnR.

(neither is remotely likely)

Kate Bush isn’t rumoured to be performing at the festival, so not the same thing at all. Is Kate Bush playing at other festivals in June? No.

I am not doubting the rumours, more the immediate assumption that GnR are headlining rather than playing legends slot and no one has so far come up with a solid argument other than their own opinion to prove otherwise 

Edited by tigger123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tigger123 said:

Kate Bush isn’t rumoured to be performing at the festival, so not the same thing at all.

I am not doubting the rumours, more the immediate assumption that GnR are headlining rather than playing legends slot

I’m only going to say this once more.

There is absolutely no chance that Guns n Roses, one of the biggest rock bands in history who sell out stadia and headline festivals all over the world, are playing a slot previously held by Lionel Richie, Barry Gibb and Kylie Minogue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass II said:

I’m only going to say this once more.

There is absolutely no chance that Guns n Roses, one of the biggest rock bands in history who sell out stadia and headline festivals all over the world, are playing a slot previously held by Lionel Richie, Barry Gibb and Kylie Minogue.

Do the Spice Girls sell out stadia? Yes. So why do many tout them for the legends slot? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tigger123 said:

Do the Spice Girls sell out stadia? Yes. So why do many tout them for the legends slot? 

Because the Spice Girls play a brand of camp, cheesy pop that would suit that slot perfectly.

Guns n Roses play a brand of music that would absolutely not suit that slot.

Have you actually been paying attention to who has been booked for it in the past?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass II said:

Because the Spice Girls play a brand of camp, cheesy pop that would suit that slot perfectly.

Guns n Roses play a brand of music that would absolutely not suit that slot.

Have you actually been paying attention to who has been booked for it in the past?

Of course I’ve been paying attention but if you’d been paying attention to what I’ve previously said in this thread, in the legends slot thread, everyone was saying that the pool of legends is drying up. Therefore there is a need to refresh said pool. Getting GnR to do it is refreshing said pool by allowing it to go in the rock direction.

Also to say sweet child of mine isn’t cheese is frankly laughable, maybe not cheesy pop but certainly cheesy rock, hence it’s inclusion on every wedding playlist since 1995

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tigger123 said:

Of course I’ve been paying attention but if you’d been paying attention to what I’ve previously said in this thread, in the legends slot thread, everyone was saying that the pool of legends is drying up. Therefore there is a need to refresh said pool. Getting GnR to do it is refreshing said pool by allowing it to go in the rock direction.

Also to say sweet child of mine isn’t cheese is frankly laughable, maybe not cheesy pop but certainly cheesy rock, hence it’s inclusion on every wedding playlist since 1995

Having GnR as the ‘legend’ would effectively render the slot obsolete, it would just be a big act who could also headline playing in the afternoon. 

Edited by Jose Pose
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tigger123 said:

Of course I’ve been paying attention but if you’d been paying attention to what I’ve previously said in this thread, in the legends slot thread, everyone was saying that the pool of legends is drying up. Therefore there is a need to refresh said pool. Getting GnR to do it is refreshing said pool by allowing it to go in the rock direction.

Also to say sweet child of mine isn’t cheese is frankly laughable, maybe not cheesy pop but certainly cheesy rock, hence it’s inclusion on every wedding playlist since 1995


The legends slot has been known in recent years as a big camp pop party, and the most successful acts - Dolly, Lionel, Kylie have got that and leant into it. Guns and Roses are by any metric a terrible fit for that slot.

There are still plenty more acts in the pool to come - the likes of Duran Duran and Bryan Adams would be much better fits if they want to look at more guitary acts. If they want to stay pop then they’ll move into the 90’s and look to likes of Robbie and the Spice Girls. Then there are acts like Cher and Celene Dion who could still do it.

It still hasn’t been made clear why Guns n Roses, who would  headline anywhere on Earth and are notoriously prickly would ever consider taking a fourth down slot. And no, I doubt they would consider it a fourth headliner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jose Pose said:

Having GnR as the ‘legend’ would effectively render the slot obsolete, it would just be a big act who could also headline playing in the afternoon. 

Are kylie  and Diana Ross not big acts? Seem to remember kylie was booked to headline in the 00s

Edited by tigger123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:


The legends slot has been known in recent years as a big camp pop party, and the most successful acts - Dolly, Lionel, Kylie have got that and leant into it. Guns and Roses are by any metric a terrible fit for that slot.

There are still plenty more acts in the pool to come - the likes of Duran Duran and Bryan Adams would be much better fits if they want to look at more guitary acts. If they want to stay pop then they’ll move into the 90’s and look to likes of Robbie and the Spice Girls. Then there are acts like Cher and Celene Dion who could still do it.

It still hasn’t been made clear why Guns n Roses, who would  headline anywhere on Earth and are notoriously prickly would ever consider taking a fourth down slot. And no, I doubt they would consider it a fourth headliner.

I would argue the legends slot is about singalong rather than camp. I wouldn’t say Ray Davies is camp.

GnR have loads of singalong hits and as I said are cheesy rock, so would therefore fit the bill given the cheese element of their music 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tigger123 said:

I would argue the legends slot is about singalong rather than camp. I wouldn’t say Ray Davies is camp.

GnR have loads of singalong hits and as I said are cheesy rock, so would therefore fit the bill given the cheese element of their music 

Ray Davies was 12 years ago. Since then Dolly Parton, Lionel Richie, Barry Gibb, Kylie Minogue and Diana Ross have done it. Fair to say the slot has evolved somewhat since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass II said:

Ray Davies was 12 years ago. Since then Dolly Parton, Lionel Richie, Barry Gibb, Kylie Minogue and Diana Ross have done it. Fair to say the slot has evolved somewhat since then.

And it will evolve again! The fact it’s evolved already gives greater weight to my argument it will evolve now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tigger123 said:

Are kylie  and Diana Ross not big acts? Seem to remember kylie was booked to headline in the 00s

It’s a Sunday afternoon slot, the legend is generally an act that suits that timing and which Dianna and Kylie did perfectly. Of course there is a bit of crossover, for example Stevie Wonder headlined but would’ve also made a great legend if booked in that slot.

GnR are a big rock band, put them in the legends slot and the slot effectively just becomes ‘anybody big’.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tigger123 said:

Answer the question rather than deflecting 

I have. Several times.

We’ll have to agree to disagree here. Personally I think the idea of GnR playing the legends slot is utter insanity and will never happen.

If they ever do I’ll meet you at the Cider Bus before and buy you a pint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jose Pose said:

It’s a Sunday afternoon slot, the legend is generally an act that suits that timing and which Dianna and Kylie did perfectly. Of course there is a bit of crossover, for example Stevie Wonder headlined but would’ve also made a great legend if booked in that slot.

GnR are a big rock band, put them in the legends slot and the slot effectively just becomes ‘anybody big’.

They’re hardly Metallica are they? They are cheesy rock. If any rock or metal head said my fave band is GnR they would be laughed at by people from that scene

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tigger123 said:

They’re hardly Metallica are they? They are cheesy rock. If any rock or metal head said my fave band is GnR they would be laughed at by people from that scene

Well they’re one hell of a lot closer to Metallica than they are to Diana Ross, Kylie and Dolly Parton, aren’t they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass II said:

I have. Several times.

We’ll have to agree to disagree here. Personally I think the idea of GnR playing the legends slot is utter insanity and will never happen.

If they ever do I’ll meet you at the Cider Bus before and buy you a pint.

Agreed. To reiterate again, I’m not trying to be difficult here, more trying to say that actually if you think about it they are a possibility for the slot and would go down a storm may I add.

as I said before, I agree it’s not likely, more I am arguing we shouldn’t immediately discount them being the legends as a possibility given the evidence I’ve given and given that there a few solid rumours for headliners this year. By having GnR as legends allows a greater accommodation of artists rumoured to be on the lineup.

Have really enjoyed the to and fro though. Enjoy rest of your Saturday x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tigger123 said:

Agreed. To reiterate again, I’m not trying to be difficult here, more trying to say that actually if you think about it they are a possibility for the slot and would go down a storm may I add.

as I said before, I agree it’s not likely, more I am arguing we shouldn’t immediately discount them being the legends as a possibility given the evidence I’ve given and given that there a few solid rumours for headliners this year. By having GnR as legends allows a greater accommodation of artists rumoured to be on the lineup.

Have really enjoyed the to and fro though. Enjoy rest of your Saturday x

Indeed pal. Have a good one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...