Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2023


#1SzigetFan

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, #1SzigetFan said:

w-fest-2023-poster.jpg

Is there any chance to have The Human League and/or Natalie Imbruglia at Sziget, what do you think? They're playing a festival in Belgium in August.

The Human League would be interesting in A38 spot as they had Goo Goo Dolls few years ago.

You are sleeping on the Village People, man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kristofm said:

20th February, still no leaks? 😞

Would you prefer The Strokes or Guns & Roses ? 😉 I still hope Green Day will finally pop up, but... 😕

And in the names i've seen on other fests', I'd take Turnstile, Aurora, Wet leg, Rina Sawayama, Shaka Ponk, Aime Simone, and ROBIN SCHULZ of course !

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, billybigballs said:

Fall Out Boy's tour dates seem to line them up for a potential one-off visit to Europe. Their diary is empty between 6 August and 19 August and they're not playing Hungary during their visit to Europe in Oct/Nov.

FOB are one of those weird acts who I'd class as too big to sub and not big enough to headline anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, billybigballs said:

Fall Out Boy's tour dates seem to line them up for a potential one-off visit to Europe. Their diary is empty between 6 August and 19 August and they're not playing Hungary during their visit to Europe in Oct/Nov.

They’re not coming to Europe only to play Sziget… impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, a_musk said:

are blur still an option or are they out of the picture now

The headliners are missing for Sunday 13th and Monday 14th.

Unfortunately, Blur are headlining Flow Festival in Helsinki on the 13th, which means they could only headline on the 14th. The two cities are 1,000 miles apart so would require a significant overnight flight to get them to Budapest. Sadly, I can't see it happening.  

But I hope I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, swelsbyuk said:

The headliners are missing for Sunday 13th and Monday 14th.

Unfortunately, Blur are headlining Flow Festival in Helsinki on the 13th, which means they could only headline on the 14th. The two cities are 1,000 miles apart so would require a significant overnight flight to get them to Budapest. Sadly, I can't see it happening.  

But I hope I'm wrong.

true but they are playing oya fest in norway on the 10th and way out west in sweden on the 11th which is an hour flight away. so it does show they are playing some shows in different countries back to back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, a_musk said:

true but they are playing oya fest in norway on the 10th and way out west in sweden on the 11th which is an hour flight away. so it does show they are playing some shows in different countries back to back

They won't be flying from Oslo (Oya) to Gothenburg (Way Out West) as it's only 3 hours drive. Well, maybe Damon and the boys will fly over but most of their equipment and production will be moved by trucks.

Also, you have to consider the fact that headliners usually do soundchecks and major preparations in the morning, which mean they would have to get most their stuff from Helsinki to Budapest in less than 12 hours. That's a logistical nightmare and would be quite expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, activean said:

And Liam. Wouldn't rule him out to co-head with someone, The Strokes, for example. Not many strong rock headliners left available. 

He's not a new addition tho. Boardmasters announced him and Florence back in November. Don't see any reason why would Sziget keep him for next announcement unless he's a plan B of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Newjem said:

Lorde announced for Boardmasters... that is the headliner Sziget is waiting for, I think.

Exactly what I thought when I saw their lineup too.

30 minutes ago, activean said:

And Liam. Wouldn't rule him out to co-head with someone, The Strokes, for example. Not many strong rock headliners left available. 

Just make this happen. Bring in Liam!!

Edited by UnBiloTitled
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, activean said:

And Liam. Wouldn't rule him out to co-head with someone, The Strokes, for example. Not many strong rock headliners left available. 

Liam played here in 2018 as a sub and didn't do anything since then that would make him more popular than he was 5 years ago.

Edited by kristofm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...