Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Skip997 said:

From who?

Because you can bet your life it ain't getting F-all from Israel

Gaza had better until it decided to sh*t it's own bed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Neil said:

Gaza can have better if it wants better .

There needs to be an agreement, like they got close with the Oslo two state thingy...but there are so many hurdles can't see it ever happening...the settlers in west bank, the fact that most of Gaza now needs rebuilding, the hate, the history,...but that should still be the goal even if it is totally unrealistic. Leadership on both sides needs changing, but there doesn't seem to be anyone there on both sides. Whole thing is a massive f**king disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

Most things are better than being bombed to oblivion, doesn't make them good though.

They weren't being bombed to Oblivion until they went murdering and raping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

There needs to be an agreement, like they got close with the Oslo two state thingy...but there are so many hurdles can't see it ever happening...the settlers in west bank, the fact that most of Gaza now needs rebuilding, the hate, the history,...but that should still be the goal even if it is totally unrealistic. Leadership on both sides needs changing, but there doesn't seem to be anyone there on both sides. Whole thing is a massive f**king disaster.

Any compromise deal will need both sides to accept they can't have everything they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They nearly got there in the early 90s with Rabin and Arafat...Rabin got killed by his own side for it and along came Netanyahu and the rest is history. There was a chance then, probably gone now. It was all part of some good sh*t that was happening in the 90s, walls coming down and peace deals...end of history and all that. Different place now, western liberal democracy on the back foot, US approaching end of its dominance, WW3 round the corner, the end is nigh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

They nearly got there in the early 90s with Rabin and Arafat...Rabin got killed by his own side for it and along came Netanyahu and the rest is history. There was a chance then, probably gone now. It was all part of some good sh*t that was happening in the 90s, walls coming down and peace deals...end of history and all that. Different place now, western liberal democracy on the back foot, US approaching end of its dominance, WW3 round the corner, the end is nigh.

and actually reading stuff on wikipedia about this, Arafat f**ked it too.

In 2000, after Yasser Arafat rejected the offer made to him by Ehud Barak based on a two-state solution and declined to negotiate for an alternative plan,[18] it became clear that Arafat would not make a deal with Israel unless it included the full Palestinian right of return, which would demographically destroy[19] the Jewish character[when defined as?] of the State of Israel.[20][21] For this reason, critics of Arafat claim that he put his desire to destroy the Jewish state above his dream of building an autonomous Palestinian state

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_views_on_the_peace_process

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

There was a chance then

not really, Israel wasn't convinced they'd have peaceful co-existence, cos the Palestinians haven't shown they can do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Neil said:

not really, Israel wasn't convinced they'd have peaceful co-existence, cos the Palestinians haven't shown they can do it.

they signed a deal, oslo accord...couldn't imagine that happening today...and maybe instead of just one siding you should read up a bit more about it...takes two sides to tango, and Rabin was a good man, as was Arafat.

(relatively good).

Oslo Accords - Wikipedia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

they signed a deal, oslo accord...couldn't imagine that happening today...and maybe instead of just one siding you should read up a bit more about it...takes two sides to tango, and Rabin was a good man, as was Arafat.

(relatively good).

Oslo Accords - Wikipedia

For the Palestinians it was mostly about getting an older generation back to the land after their time had run out in lebanon, Jordan and Tunisia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SheffJeff said:

16516(1).thumb.jpeg.8163978d5b2e1a7d0806b44fa0cec958.jpeg

Grim.

I might get some hate on here but this is what frustrates me about what Hamas did on Oct 7th, they knew the make up of the Israeli govt, they knew what the reaction would be, they knew it would likely be devastating for Gazans, the knew, maybe hoped, that it would lead to a wider war. Israeli govt are a bunch of c**ts, but so are Hamas. Evil twat fanatical c**ts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

And of course all those 5590 were "terrorists"

and from the same angle each one of those 251 were evil oppressors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

too many words...what are you suggesting?

I've spent time in Israel, they are the most security conscious/paranoid people I've met and yet despite repeated warnings from their eyes on the border they declined or decided not to act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Crikey.   I remember Muse cancelling a Lolla headline set in 2017 due to a massive thunderstorm after only 3 songs. Clearly this is an area of the world where the storms don't f**k around.
    • I still think they might take another shot at the normal weekend.    I'm also pretty sure this exact same speculation was happening after the last one.
    • Meanwhile in Chicago. Rained overnight at Lolla. Now they pushed back opening til the afternoon. But thunderstorms and lightning forecast. Maybe if the city invested in proper drainage they couldve tried to salvage the day.
    • Wasn't just me who thought it was either oversold or inadequately setup for the event then? For Pride, over the weekend, where there's also acts in the large blue marquee that was to the right of the "arena" (for want of a better term), it's probably much better as people are dispersed more. Thought the band were great, as was Nick, though he was clearly struggling with his voice at times.
    • I got in for £11.25 in the end, which was absolutely ridiculously good value, and made the queues and overselling of the venue much more tolerable! Sniping in on other people’s unwanted tickets on the day of an event might become my new hobby I think 🥳
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...