Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, SheffJeff said:

Presumably as mortgages go up so will rents which will make it even harder for first time buyers to save any kind of a deposit... the whole housing market needs some sort of shake up really or the government needs to meet/exceed their targets on housebuilding.  

Needs a correction, but in a way that doesn't cause too much pain.

Hasn't Truss said she's going to rip up stalinist house building targets...but also said she will get rid of woke  regulations preventing building on nice green places where all the birds live and also near where all the anti growth nimby tories live.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see major rent rises myself, infact I think we are moving into a period where energy and food costs will take a bigger proportion of a persons wages vs say rent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lost said:

Its that 80 majority which makes me doubt something early. But yes that majority was built on the back of the red wall who voted for brexit to try and get some protection from the hyper-globalisation they've been subjected to over the last 20 odd years and now the Tories are doing the exact opposite. Doesn't take a genius to work out why they are polling so badly. 

The latest it can be is very early 2025, i think like January 2025? Doubt that would happen, who wants a Jan election. Maybe September 2024 or something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

Needs a correction, but in a way that doesn't cause too much pain.

 

I don't see a way that this is possible. People are mortgaged up to their eyeballs on cheap money, the only way house prices were going down was if interest rates went up. That's gonna lead to some negative equity and pain for some people regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Skip997 said:

I know nothing about how house may or may not benefit owners. Never been involved in the housing market and never will.

Tend to agree about folks only caring about their house value.

It’s basically a monthly outgoings thing. When peoples fixed rate mortgages expire then they’ll be put on a much more expensive fixed or variable rate mortgage. As monthly outgoings are stretched as it is this will mean things will be even more difficult for many people as their mortgage payments will ballon in cost too.

I don’t think it’s a worry about the value of the property it’s about affording to live in their house. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Skip997 said:

 

Refreshing to read.

All i usually hear is the opposite.

I love where I live and I want others to be able to buy their own home which is much easier with lower house prices. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those of you wanting low house prices are still in the transient state of your lives. Do you think you’re in the house you’ll spend the rest of your life in?

A lot of those worrying about house prices falling probably won’t move again, they just want what they own to keep increasing it’s value. Highly selfish but it will be why they vote Tory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

Those of you wanting low house prices are still in the transient state of your lives. Do you think you’re in the house you’ll spend the rest of your life in?

A lot of those worrying about house prices falling probably won’t move again, they just want what they own to keep increasing it’s value. Highly selfish but it will be why they vote Tory. 

I can’t say for sure as I don’t know what might happen but right now I would be perfectly happy living in my flat for the rest of my live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

A lot of those worrying about house prices falling probably won’t move again, they just want what they own to keep increasing it’s value. Highly selfish but it will be why they vote Tory. 

What ended up being labelled the dementia tax by labour seemed pretty fair to me.

You don't pay a penny whilst your alive but this asset that's increased in value without you doing anything that you don't need when you are dead goes some way to pay for your care in old age. The public hated it.

Edited by lost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

Those of you wanting low house prices are still in the transient state of your lives. Do you think you’re in the house you’ll spend the rest of your life in?

I'm way too old to be in "the transient state", but am not a house "owner", nor will I ever be.

No idea where I'll spend the rest of my life but it won't be here.

I want low house prices simply so that some folks who want a house may have half a chance. Plus house prices are absolutely ridiculous.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

Those of you wanting low house prices are still in the transient state of your lives. Do you think you’re in the house you’ll spend the rest of your life in?

A lot of those worrying about house prices falling probably won’t move again, they just want what they own to keep increasing it’s value. Highly selfish but it will be why they vote Tory. 

Reckon I am there for life, may have to move in old age maybe . Still want prices to fall. Far to high it's mad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, lost said:

What ended up being labelled the dementia tax by labour seemed pretty fair to me.

You don't pay a penny whilst your alive but this asset that's increased in value without you doing anything that you don't need when you are dead goes some way to pay for your care in old age. The public hated it.

Isn't that what happens now. 

Edit, ignore me just gone back and refreshed myself on what it was

Edited by fred quimby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, fred quimby said:

Reckon I am there for life, may have to move in old age maybe . Still want prices to fall. Far to high it's mad

They really are far too high. Trying to get on the mortgage ladder these days is so difficult. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fred quimby said:

Isn't that what happens now. 

Yes but the way it was framed during that election. I'm simply pointing out this whole house price thing that has been a weird obsession for this country is exploited by both parties and I get that's how democracy works you have to say things people want to hear.

I also believe it was Gordon Brown who took hose prices out of the inflation index and replaced them with rents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

Those of you wanting low house prices are still in the transient state of your lives. Do you think you’re in the house you’ll spend the rest of your life in?

A lot of those worrying about house prices falling probably won’t move again, they just want what they own to keep increasing it’s value. Highly selfish but it will be why they vote Tory. 

who knows but if i move somewhere bigger and house prices have fallen then that house will have also fallen by the same % and a bigger amount in £s .... anything ive got after I retire will be spent on living if i have to move elsewhere as my pension is gonna be shit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, lost said:

What ended up being labelled the dementia tax by labour seemed pretty fair to me.

You don't pay a penny whilst your alive but this asset that's increased in value without you doing anything that you don't need when you are dead goes some way to pay for your care in old age. The public hated it.

yeah, they shouldn't have announced it during an election campaign...got ditched and was actually a progressive way of funding social care which desperately needs it (and still does). Any tax is unpopular unless it just effects the rich only..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Barry Fish said:

I think most of our generation will be in that position - house funds retirement. 

my company pension will be worth jack shit ..... guess i need to hope for some kind of state pension but think ill be clasping at straws 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

yeah, they shouldn't have announced it during an election campaign...got ditched and was actually a progressive way of funding social care which desperately needs it (and still does). Any tax is unpopular unless it just effects the rich only..

An even better way would be a National Care Service, to supplement a properly funded NHS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Ah, well. Never mind, hey.
    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...