Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2020


jj200

Recommended Posts

Is Mad Cool really that good this year though?

Very top heavy, headliner wise they have the big hitters. Over all though just the same as all festivals this year, not seen a great line up anywhere. 

I would say Roskilde is the strongest line up this year.

 

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Matt86 said:

We all agree : Mad Cools line up is great. No doubt about it.

BUT ! ... there's no camping. And in my opinion, it is hard to call a music event a "festival" when there's no camping. Even if I know many of you guys wouldn't agree with me lol..

No camping is what's put me off the likes of mad cool and primavera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mad Cool has Live Nation backing, they pull almost every act touring Europe in July, like a vacuum cleaner. Sziget will never beat it, lineup wise (even though MC had very meh heads last year, the second, third and etc. tier is always very strong). But Sziget is better organized and its advantages are very well known. 5-6 decent acts a day and I’m good to go, personally. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

frequency announces bigger bands on 12th, only electronic acts on 3rd

as the question appeared if eminem isn't too big for frequency, normally i would say yes. but for now the line up seems relatively cheap so far, though the 3 biggest acts by now could each headline a day. so it has to be bigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BBU said:

take this with a grain of salt but apparently a copywriter confirmed that billie eilish is doing sziget this year 

Guess it would be technically possible if she has more Eastern Europe acts coming. She has a big gap after the UK shows. Although she has been ruled out several times by the leakers on this forum. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Akujin sama said:

Do you know her? Or she posted this somewhere online?

 

Just now, swelsbyuk said:

So she's not a friend or acquaintance of yours? Where have you picked this up from?

well basically this afternoon she tweeted that billie is coming and i wanted to check her credibility so i scrolled down A LOT on her twitter account and i've stumbled upon an article she wrote for her company last year. that's how i know here she works at. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BBU said:

 

well basically this afternoon she tweeted that billie is coming and i wanted to check her credibility so i scrolled down A LOT on her twitter account and i've stumbled upon an article she wrote for her company last year. that's how i know here she works at. 

Can you share the specific tweet? :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly I also saw this account with the tweet “can’t wait for Billie Eilish to be announced for Sziget”. 
 

I was gonna screenshot it but the tweet is gone...

She also claims in one of her tweets that she works with the “best artists around the world”

https://twitter.com/slhixpster

 

Edited by Akujin sama
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Akujin sama said:

Interestingly I also saw this account with the tweet “can’t wait for Billie Eilish to be announced for Sziget”. 
 

I was gonna screenshot it but the tweet is gone...

She also claims in one of her tweets that she works with the “best artists around the world”

https://twitter.com/slhixpster

 

It's an old tweet from 3 Feb 2019.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...