Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
14 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

Not sure what the fuss is about really. He kept possession well and got about the pitch, but nothing more. Like most Tottenham players he's a bit of a dirty fucker and fully deserved his booking. 

At 22 it's hard to see him pulling up too many trees. I'd say he's far more likely to be a David Thompson than a Steven Gerrard. Heck, Mark Noble had 100 top flight appearances by the time he was Stewart's age. 

I thought he was very decent in the 1st half, tho less so in the 2nd.

And Liverpool haven't been giving kids the opportunities. Sterling had to threaten (Dalglish) to quit to start getting games, Ibe appears to have been a bit luckier, but overall Rodgers preferred to buy loads of new players of about the same quality to play (a few games and then bin), rather than give any of the kids a chance.

(I didn't even know there were some half decent kids at the club until Klopp played them in the cup :P)

So I'd say it's a bit harsh to write him off cos he's not got games till now, and while nothing about him looked world class and that's nothing of what I'm expecting, nothing about him looked out of place the other night either. More games could have him standing out a bit more, and I'd be interested to see him get more opportunities.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin
3 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

Well if mid table mediocrity is the answer, then perhaps Stewart should be a regular. I guess it's only Henderson he's got to be better than so...

Out of interest, who are these kids you speak of? 

the ones who played against WHU the other night, plus the other ones who got a game in the previous cup matches. They were of varying quality, of course, tho (in general) the better ones played the other night.

And yes, perhaps mid-table mediocrity is about right. They certainly did OK against WHU. :P

But you don't find out unless they get the games. I reckon Stewart, and Smith*, and perhaps one or two others deserve some more games.

(*and Flanagan too, tho he's less of an unplayed kid, and starting to get games again anyway).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
11 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

Flanagan is 23. Smith is 21. Teixeira, Ilori and Stewart are 22. Ibe is 20. 

Chirivella was the one you could label a kid (IMO) that played the other night. 

Yeah they did OK - certainly better than the adults did earlier in the season...

Flanagan is just coming back from nearly 2 years out injured - and where he'd just about secured himself a first team position before he was injured ... and I made clear I wasn't really counting him as a kid or a rookie.

For the others, I should really have said 'rookies' and not 'kids', i guess.

Very few of them have been given a real chance until now. And as you say, they did OK.

Which is why I'm saying they should have another chance. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
15 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

Has there ever been a worse protest than the scarf one?

don't think so.

But the fact the nature of the protest was "we're going to keep paying the prices", it was never likely to be an effective protest against prices.

If you're going to be unwilling to pay the prices it means you'll be willing to miss the game - and the protest the other day showed those fans as being prepared to miss the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eFestivals said:

For the others, I should really have said 'rookies' and not 'kids', i guess.

Very few of them have been given a real chance until now. And as you say, they did OK.

Fair enough. 

When would you play them though? The League Cup final? Europa League? Premier League? 

When do you think Klopp will play them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
19 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

When would you play them though? The League Cup final? Europa League? Premier League? 

I'd use them for (some) Prem games thru the rest of the season, to find out more about their 1st team potential.

After all it's pretty much a write off in the Prem now, and there's bound to be a significant clear out in the summer as Klopp builds his own team. Now's the best time to find the prime candidates for that clear-out.

 

19 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

When do you think Klopp will play them?

That one's more difficult to answer.

We don't know what he's been tasked with by the club, or what promises he might have given them.

I also don't feel I know enough about how he does things to know how much of a chance he might be prepared to give them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

That one's more difficult to answer.

We don't know what he's been tasked with by the club, or what promises he might have given them.

I also don't feel I know enough about how he does things to know how much of a chance he might be prepared to give them.

 

I think his record at Dortmund shows if he doesn't pick youth it's because he doesn't think they're good enough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
32 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

I think his record at Dortmund shows if he doesn't pick youth it's because he doesn't think they're good enough

I'd say he's probably not had a chance to consider whether they're good enough til about now, and it's difficult to know if he'd have gone the same with the rookies in the cup if there hadn't been a big injury crisis with the normal first-teamers.

It'll be interesting to see if any get any further chances from now cos I reckon some deserve some playing time ... tho if he's guaranteed finishing high enough to get Europa league, I wouldn't be surprised for them to get no chances, to go with the less risky bet of the normal first teamers.

What i'm getting at behind this is if some were given the game time, some of the 'established' names might come under threat. I thought you'd be liking that possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

you took a pop at henderson back up the back.

Did I? 

He's just not very good is he? 

If we ignore ancient history when Liverpool were great and just look at recent history - I.e. from the turn of the decade Liverpool have finished 7th, 6th, 8th, 7th, 2nd, and 6th. They currently sit 9th.

Those finishes (the freakish Suarez season aside) are a result of having pretty mediocre players. Jordan Henderson typifies this no? Obviously he's good, but he would be lucky to be on the bench at most of the club's above Liverpool in the table right? Mignolet isn't as good as West Ham's 2nd keeper - that should be embarrassing for a club of Liverpool's standing. 

Now I'm quite happy if Liverpool don't improve, but if they are to, they need to be replacing the likes of Henderson with better players. Maybe Stewart or some other 'rookies' are better?  Maybe they're not. 

It'll be interesting to see what Klopp does in the summer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
8 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

He's just not very good is he?

II can't make up mind about him. He's not played much this season, and he's playing injured.

Whether he'd be good enough with other better players around him and heading for the top of the league I'm not sure, but he doesn't particularly look out of his depth amongst the players alongside him, apart from perhaps with his lack of goal scoring.(tho that's a problem most of them have).

At the same time, if he was one that Klopp decoded to move on, I wouldn't be surprised. It'll be at least some of the players around the same performance, that's for sure.

If I were manager, there's not many I'd go out of my way to try to keep. Coutinho is about the only bright spark in the regular first teamers.

Most of the rest are much of a muchness, and while you could keep some of those to play within an improved-overall team, I wouldn't want to keep more than a few.

Coutinho. I'd try and keep Sturridge, cos despite being sicknote, he's proper quality. I'd give Origi more of a go, and I'd give Ings another chance once he's fit. Maybe even Flanagan, as he was playing great before getting injured. But if the rest left, bye-bye. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, eFestivals said:

II can't make up mind about him. He's not played much this season, and he's playing injured.

Whether he'd be good enough with other better players around him and heading for the top of the league I'm not sure, but he doesn't particularly look out of his depth amongst the players alongside him, apart from perhaps with his lack of goal scoring.(tho that's a problem most of them have).

 

I agree he doesn't look out of his depth and is a perfectly adequate squad player, however Liverpool seem to think of him as key midfielder and captain and I think at that level he is a little short.  I see him as  Nicky Butt, Darren Fletcher type level player which isn't a criticism as both have had successful careers.  However as TGT rightfully states he wouldn't be knocking on the door of any of the teams who are regularly fighting for the top 4 positions.

 

5 hours ago, eFestivals said:

 

If I were manager, there's not many I'd go out of my way to try to keep. Coutinho is about the only bright spark in the regular first teamers.

Most of the rest are much of a muchness, and while you could keep some of those to play within an improved-overall team, I wouldn't want to keep more than a few.

I think I see it in a similar way.  The majority of the players are okish squad players, but there aren't enough at the level above.   Most could stay and do a job, or leave and not be missed.  I think it will depend what offers are on the table from other clubs.  I personally think Firminio is worth persevering with.  He is inconsistent, but at least looks like he has the talent to be a bit more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
9 hours ago, pink_triangle said:

However as TGT rightfully states he wouldn't be knocking on the door of any of the teams who are regularly fighting for the top 4 positions.

and let's just ignore how fergie felt the need to slag him off because Henderson snubbed him. :P

 

9 hours ago, pink_triangle said:

I think I see it in a similar way.  The majority of the players are okish squad players, but there aren't enough at the level above.   Most could stay and do a job, or leave and not be missed.  I think it will depend what offers are on the table from other clubs.  I personally think Firminio is worth persevering with.  He is inconsistent, but at least looks like he has the talent to be a bit more.

yep, the bit you've said that you've bolded was what I was getting at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
9 hours ago, pink_triangle said:

Johnson sacked by Sunderland.  While I suspect they are happy to have him off the wage bill, I honestly believe that they would have done the same if he was in the middle of an amazing season.  The rumours seem to suggest that Sunderland had no knowledge about the guilty plea until yesterday.

yeah, my impression is that he's been sacked for telling the club he wasn't guilty but then pleaded guilty, rather than for any other specific reason.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DomDom1984 said:

He's been sacked because he's guilty. Not because of not saying or whatever. He's guilty of grooming and sexual activity with a minor. Sunderland won't want to touch him now and neither will most clubs.

yeah. reading the prosecution case, she was a fan of the club, first met him at the football club,she told him over facebook she was 15, and this was before the sexual activity.

 

i go with my earlier assessment. the nonce deserves jail time 

Edited by zahidf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Ah, well. Never mind, hey.
    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...