Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


zero000

Recommended Posts

Nearly that time again. 

Can't see past Ireland or England for the championship, and for me the two away games in Cardiff for England in the second round of games and Ireland in the 4th round of games will be pivotal. 

Intrigued to see how Finn Russell and his improved Scotland play, and also how much difference Conor O'Shea can make with Italy. 

Finally of course, there's Lions spots up for grabs....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree it is hard to see beyond England or Ireland. England are also going after New Zealand's win record so they will be doubly motivated. 

I've been given some free tickets for Wales v England which is awesome... however I know I am just going to watch us get battered :(

I have actually put a bet on us (Wales) to finish 5th. Ireland and England could easily beat us at home and being away to Scotland and France doesn't fill me with confidence. In fact I can't say i'm fully confident we'll even beat Italy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm probably being a tad on the optimistic side here - but maybe just maybe Scotland might be a bit of a surprise package. Glasgow have been superb this season destroying Leicester & winning twice against Racing 92 and they have 9 starters tomorrow so teamwork should be good.

Ireland may not be the ideal start but at least it's at Murrayfield.

Time to wheel this out again...

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LJS said:

I'm probably being a tad on the optimistic side here - but maybe just maybe Scotland might be a bit of a surprise package. Glasgow have been superb this season destroying Leicester & winning twice against Racing 92 and they have 9 starters tomorrow so teamwork should be good.

Ireland may not be the ideal start but at least it's at Murrayfield.

Time to wheel this out again...

 

 

 

Every year for one afternoon it is very tense in the PT household as we take opposite sides for the Wales v Scotland match. I think we have seen 8 of them and Wales have won every time. I think one year Scotland were 7 points ahead with 1 minute to go and still lost. I fear this may be the year I pay for 8 years worth of gloating!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LJS said:

I'm probably being a tad on the optimistic side here - but maybe just maybe Scotland might be a bit of a surprise package. 

Depends what you mean by surprise package I guess? I'd be surprised if Scotland finished in the top 2. However I'd also be surprised if they finished in the bottom 2. 

Gregor Townsend has big shoes to fill come June. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

You should never hate a team more than you support your own - be it club or country.

 

(That made me laugh though. Not seen it before. Can't believe they banned it).

I'd never wish Scotland to lose, LJS (except against England), but then I always want the guys with no chance to do well. 

Thanks. :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ThomThomDrum said:

That English defence is a defence that wins championships. Immense stuff from them. Super game to watch last night from start to finish. Wales can count themselves unlucky but they came upon a wall 

True but Wales were the architects of their own failure to some extent - failing to take points int he first half when they were on offer and bafflingly failing to kick to touch which led to England's wining try.

Now, what's the chances of a Scotland win in Paris?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Fantastic result for Scotland, absolutely well deserved.

Having said that Wales were absolutely dire in the second half. Completely unthreatening in attack once again and a huge number of turnovers and penalties conceded. 

Time for a shake up in the Wales coaching set up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, zero000 said:

Fantastic result for Scotland, absolutely well deserved.

Having said that Wales were absolutely dire in the second half. Completely unthreatening in attack once again and a huge number of turnovers and penalties conceded. 

Time for a shake up in the Wales coaching set up.

Looking forwards to Championship decider between Scotland & England

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheGayTent said:

Gatland will be back for next 6 nations

That's not much consolation in all honesty. Gatland's game plan has been found out. England have taken great strides with largely the same squad from the world cup, whilst Wales are treading water at best.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

And to be honest if England had have wised up earlier and just picked the ball up and run forward every time whilst Italy were all on our side we'd have scored more in first half. 

Hmm, not sure which of our 2 final games to be worried about now - England or Italy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

Personally nothing wrong with it. Very weird but nothing illegal and surely one of the main jobs of a coach is to come up with new and innovative tactics. 

Yeah I would say I agree. It certainly made a game that almost everyone thought was a forgone conclusions more interesting. I really enjoyed Haskell and Hartley really struggle to get their heads around the whole thing.

Just hope it's not something that catches on (with refinements obviously). But yeah I appreciate what Italy attempted. One of the pundits/ commentators said around halftime that they thought Italy should go back to traditional rucking for parts of the second half to confuse the England lads further, which probably wouldn't have been a bad idea as they did eventually cotten on. 

Looking forward to Scotland England next week now. Scots playing some lovely stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was fucking terrible - O'Shea is the hypocrite here. He's spent the entire build up talking about all the mistakes Italian rugby have made in the past concentrating on the short term to a detriment to the long term development of the Italian team....then he employs a tactic like that solely in an attempt to lose by less points than otherwise....that performance and those tactics aren't going to do anything for the long term development of Italy, the opposite to my mind. 

Aside from that, England were poor, and they were poor before the no ruck tactics had any effect too. In the tackle and kicking execution in particular were awful. If Scotland play like they have thus far, and so do England, Scotland win in 2 weeks - which would be the first time in 35 years at Twickenham (I think?). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheGayTent said:

It was fucking terrible - O'Shea is the hypocrite here. He's spent the entire build up talking about all the mistakes Italian rugby have made in the past concentrating on the short term to a detriment to the long term development of the Italian team....then he employs a tactic like that solely in an attempt to lose by less points than otherwise....that performance and those tactics aren't going to do anything for the long term development of Italy, the opposite to my mind. 

Aside from that, England were poor, and they were poor before the no ruck tactics had any effect too. In the tackle and kicking execution in particular were awful. If Scotland play like they have thus far, and so do England, Scotland win in 2 weeks - which would be the first time in 35 years at Twickenham (I think?). 

Here's hoping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...