Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


zero000

Recommended Posts

I personally don't feel the need for bonus points. While last weekend was a great spectacle, its not something I want to see every game. A low scoring tense game, can be just as entertaining. I don't want to see games falsely engineered by a new points system, is there anything really wrong with the tournament as it is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
1 hour ago, TheGayTent said:

Where have all the Irish gone? 

 

Could blame the dirty French or the second rate officiating, but it all comes down to not being good enough in execution in the end. 1 try in 160 minutes of rugby? Awful stuff. Getting beat by that French side is nearly embarrassing.

The Ireland Italy game is a pretty intriguing prospect IMO. The Italians with no points seems wrong at this juncture

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

What are peoples thoughts on this weekends matches then? Wales, England and Scotland for me..

From a Welsh perspective - hugely frustrated to have drawn the game against Ireland. To go 16-13 up and give away a penalty minutes later was stupid. Having said that at 13-0 down I'd probably have taken it.

France were awful against Scotland but managed to beat Ireland so have no idea what to expect from them (and us) on Friday.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

As a Welshman it pains me but I must congratulate England. We were horrendous for 70 minutes of that game on the weekend but that's due to England not letting us play. The final score flatters us and doesn't really tell the story of the match.

That having been said, if we'd have managed to somehow pull a win out of the bag I'd probably still be drunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

Not in six nations for me. It would be possible to do the grand slam and not win it which would be ludicrous. 

Unless a grand slam earns ten bonus points or something like that but that seems a bit silly too. 

Yeah never thought about that one actually. Either way its been fairly boring this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

That's more cos all teams are a bit shit at minute I think. Can't remember last time the winner was guaranteed before the last round. And England - although good against Wales - haven't been that good really. 

Or maybe for you it's been boring cos Ireland have been very shit! ;-)

Agree on all fronts! I think the World Cup was a harsh reminder of the gulf between the hemispheres at the moment. Both in quality and style. Us vs Argentina especially. We came out tentatively and were beaten in 10 minutes!

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

The whole bonus points thing is weird anyway. The fact that it is possible (although unlikely) to get the same points for losing a game as drawing one is just silly IMO. 

I think that only happened in the bizarre way bonus points worked in the world cup. Is it not usually 4 points for a win & 2 for a draw. With only one bonus point available to losers.

I watched a pro12 game , Glasgow v. Cardiff blues I think. Glasgow were winning comfortably & without bonus points the last 10 minutes would probably have been pretty dull. However both sides were within sight of a bonus point & as a result we got a feast of attacking rugby. 

If you use the points system above the lowest points you could have as a grand slam winner would be 20. The highest any other country could get would be 20 so all you need to do is have head to head as the decider. 

Sorted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

That's the same as WC. 4 for a win, 2 for a draw. But if you score 4 tries and lose by less than whatever the total is, then you would get 2 points for losing. Like I said unlikely but possible.

The side that finished 2nd could get 4 wins (16 points) all with bonus points (total 20) and then get a losing bonus point against the grand slam winner - 21 points (quite likely). 

So you need to restrict the losing team to a maximum of 1 point...Sorted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

For the first example, but that is separate from the 6 nations example. Restricted to 1 losing bonus point, they could get 21 points in total and finish above whoever does the Grand Slam with just 20 points.

If they could get both bonus points, they could get 22. 

Well spotted, I forgot about their losing bonus point against the grand spammers. 

So, you could award a couple of bonus points for winning the grand slam. Or you could say " the champions shall be the team that defeats all the other teams. If no team dies this the champions shall be the team with the most points.

I am sure there are other ways. Rugby is very good at complicated rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

A page or so back I said that the only way round it would be to give 10 bonus points for grand slam or something, but I'll be honest I don't like it. Personal choice of course, but I also don't think it'll change the rugby. Bonus points work in competitions with more teams in for me. 

The main advantage would be in non grand slam years maybe having to rely less on points difference in non grand slam years but I always feel like winning the championship is a bit of a second prize without a grand slam. 

I think the point about it working better in competitions with more teams is a fair one. And like any change it would probably work better some years than others. 

Where I definitely agree with you is that being able to get the same points for a defeat as you do for a draw is crazy.

Personally until recently, I'd have favoured a system that gave Scotland a bonus point for turning up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...