Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2014 FIFA World Cup


Guest Andre91

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

?? Really?

The majority of top teams in the World are from Europe making it historically a tougher competition to progress in than the World Cup.

What in particular do you not like about them apart from the likes of Brazil and Argentina missing from them??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the papers are saying that Suarez claims to be 100% fit for the England game. Utter horseshit IMO. Yes, he will most likely play, but if he was near 100% fit the other night he would have come on when the game was 1-1 and the fact that he was sitting firmly on the bench at 2-1 showed he was never ever going to play against Costa Rica. He was only on the bench as a piece of psychological war fare with England and Italy. They hoped they could win without him and make it look as if he is fitter than he in reality is. There is no way a player goes from 100% cant play to 100% fit in the space of 2/3 days.

I also see the chatter is that Woy is considering dropping Wooney. Fair balls to him and I hope it works out for him if he does.

It could also be the making of Wooney if he uses it as a motivating tool. However, if he is to come on at some point he has to play in a central position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had a lot said about Hodgson making "ballsy" decision and I dont really agree.

His squad selection was called courageous, by picking the youth. However this was consistent with the wishes of the fans and the media. To me a ballsy (not necesarily correct) selection is going against public opinion eg picking someone like Cleverley and being open to critisicm if it goes wrong.

As for dropping Rooney, this seems to be in line with public opinion. To me following public opinion is not being ballsy. The ballsy (again not necesarily correct) option is to come out and say, I couldnt care less what the fans think, Im the manager and I pick the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here is a really good in depth article on Vedad Ibisevic. (if looking for something to read over lunch) His fleeing for his life from his home town when he was a kid is pretty amazing stuff. At one point his mother digs a small hole for him and his baby sister to hide in and which they do when the Serbs come upon their home.

Its unreal to think of how many such stories the people of Bosnia can tell.

For Ibisevic personally to go from hiding for his life and protecting that of his baby sister's, in a hole in a wood, to scoring the goal that would mean Bosnia & Herzegovina qualify for their first World Cup must be a very cathartic journey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally love both. Yep they are pretty different but I dont get how someone who likes football and is from Europe would say the Euros "suck". I just wonder what it is about them that they dont like? The idea of big teams facing each other in a knock out tournament far from sucks to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Further to this the World Cup always has a few whipping boys, or at least those we can feel confident will not progress. Personally I think the Euros and the WC group stages match up pretty well wrt competitiveness. And if I had to choose one I would say that the Euro group stages are more competitive than the WCs.

while I wouldn't necessarily argue with that, in the WC things are starting to get far more even as the years go by. There's fewer and fewer "definitely going home" (after the groups) teams each time it comes around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

while I wouldn't necessarily argue with that, in the WC things are starting to get far more even as the years go by. There's fewer and fewer "definitely going home" (after the groups) teams each time it comes around.

Edited by ThomThomDrum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW we are still not complete one round of games in this WC so I can only really base what Im saying on previous WCs. And I would argue that in previous WCs folk could have predicted at least up to 8 of those going no where and just making up numbers.

Edit - So far this WC is looking a lot more competitive but we will see if its in fact 1st game blips.......

Edited by ThomThomDrum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the next euros in France will be interesting as it'll be the first one that's had 24 teams in. Should mean it'll be easier for lower ranked sides to qualify (23 out of 53 will qualify compared to 15/51 previously [14/51 last time due to having 2 host nations]. Which means there will be more opportunities for surprises (or more boring one sided games...)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My main thing is that you don't get fantastic groups like Germany, Ghana, Portugal, USA in the Euros. Hell the Ivory Coast/Japan/Columbia trio is exciting as well. I love watching the pretty good non-European teams who have real chances of getting to the quarters. You also tend to get the same players in the Euros as you do in CL games, whereas we've seen some fantastic performances from relative unknowns already in Brazil.

To say the Euros suck was a bit excessive, but to me it's just more of the same as the domestic season and qualifiers, it doesn't grip me with tournament fever to anywhere near the same degree. In fact I prefer the ACON to the Euros just because it provides genuine variation and unpredictability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite their first group game I'd expect the reigning euro champions to go further in the World Cup than last years ACON winners. One is better than the other by some considerable distance IMO.

That's not to say that football of a lesser quality is automatically less entertaining - far from it, I've witnessed many enthralling non-league games, however I wouldn't subscribe to the idea that the Euros are less entertaining than the ACON.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...