Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2013-2014


Guest kaosmark2

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The only thing players will respond to is action. Stern words prior to the game won't mean anything when they push the refs and find out that the stern words aren't backed up. They shouldn't need warning prior to the game, they should be punished consistently in line with the rules with clear explanation when it does occur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cant see Barcelona selling Fabregas with a possible transfer ban hanging over them in the next transfer window. As for Man Utd missing out on champions league effects their pull to some extent, but i dont think its a given players will choose Arsenal and (particularly) Liverpool over them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of us can't really comment on Pele, it's more what other people say. Only part of me that discounts Pele is he was in a very good team full of stars, the 1970 was perhaps the best international team of all time.

People talk about the barca side being the best club side ever to play football and I am unsure about that. I could make a case of the Juventus side of the mid 90s the best club side I've seen which included Zidane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I cant see Barcelona selling Fabregas with a possible transfer ban hanging over them in the next transfer window. As for Man Utd missing out on champions league effects their pull to some extent, but i dont think its a given players will choose Arsenal and (particularly) Liverpool over them.

it's a combination of things, including how likely a player is to get a game at the clubs offering them a contract.

What we can be certain of tho is that Utd's draw is less than it was. CL footie makes a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think United will still have a pull for a short time, but they have to do something next season I think. Liverpool and City were both clubs with big ambition who fully believed they could go further, and Man United are a massive club who SHOULD be in the CL and aren't, and thus there's every possibility they'll be there next season.

If they spend two seasons out though, some serious problems will hit them as far as attracting players goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we say that a lot and I tend to agree, have we any facts though to back it up. I'm trying to think of players joining a team due to champions league football.

For example Toure joining city when they had no champions league football, Suarez stopping when Liverpool didn't have champions league football, Rooney signing a contract when it was obvious united wasn't going to be in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think United will still have a pull for a short time, but they have to do something next season I think. Liverpool and City were both clubs with big ambition who fully believed they could go further, and Man United are a massive club who SHOULD be in the CL and aren't, and thus there's every possibility they'll be there next season.

If they spend two seasons out though, some serious problems will hit them as far as attracting players goes.

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yep - should have been the Stones.
    • Yeah I do agree on the 2 hour thing. But if they were subbed by Biffy/WA only doing 75 mins or so would be doable.   Only reason I suggested them was because we know they're back doing shows here next year. 
    • Its probably the culmination of issues that have been simmering under the surface for a while. Spain ran a regularisation program recently that allows undocumented individuals to obtain temporary legal status and then a route to EU citizenship. 1.2 million applied. At the same time Montenegro is having to close its citizenship via investment program as part of EU ascension talks.    Countries are obviously asking, why are we having to reject investors whilst others can wave anyone in?
    • I'm not sure, they aren't giving any headliner in that format 2hours and Foos would have at least 2. I wouldn't say Reading is likely for them next year either. If they are as said going big on a tour with stadiums and festivals then the UK is once place they can definitely do stadiums and that would rule them out. And that's even if they come back for a second UK stint as I fully expect them in Europe from very early. That could be seen as hyperthetical but there are is some places I cannot see them not doing from history.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...