Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2013-2014


Guest kaosmark2

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin

Bah. Bit annoyed at Jose. Man U were almost dead for the season, now they might not be. I reckon a 50/50 chance of them getting to 4 now...

nah ... they'd need their form to skyrocket. While he'd improve them, I can't see him improving them that much, because it's not really a player like him that they need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I dunno. Some of the matches, they've just missed a small push to get a goal in. Mata could give them that push and points. I'd say he's had another potential 10 points to their total ( as in, 10 points more than they would have got without him). If Everton/Liverpool continue to lose silly points, that could be enough for 4...

If you add 10 points to Utd's average you have them performing the same as all of of Arsenal, Chelsea, and Man City.

Really, do you think that'll happen? Or have you instead not looked properly at the maths?

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, i'm not looking at it in mathematical terms: all their dropped points have generally come this season through losing or drawing by more than one goal. (On average, not couting the recent Chelsea Spanking).

If the same rough pattern follows the seond half of the season, and say Mata gets them a goal in half those games, then i would roughly say he'd get them 10 extra points.

I could be horribly wrong of course. I hope i am!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • You do get some weird swings here and there, so... Cypress Hill?
    • It was great, but I don't know why they continue to play Wide Lovely Eyes and Rings of Saturn, which are the weakest of the tracks off both PTSA and ST. Well, I do. It's cos they're about Suzie, so he can sing what he wants. They're the low points of the set. The rest is ace.
    • I didn't this time, but I've seen them before and just because you saw both that night doesn’t mean you can compare them. The Stones were great, but.you didn't think so and you went somewhere else looking for a good time and you found it. For whatever reason you didn't like it, but you were an outlier and all the reviews said they were great.
    • Annie Lennox could be the one to unite the whole forum, nobody has a bad word to say about her, even noted curmudgeon Skip 😄 I'd probably even amble along for a bit meself, and i'm also a miserable sod 
    • If the below link works - thats interesting.   While I don't particularly put much stock in that account as a source (never seen it before though, tbf), and I can pick a hole or two (see below) in what he says - the timing of it is a week before I had the Fontaines '27 stadium info (same stadium he says on there, Tottenham). The info, or part of it, matches up.   Holes I'd pick: I'd have to watch again but I THINK he says 'end of year' for Tottenham - not possible, for a number of reasons, though he's probably just got his words mixed up there. It's Summer '27, or that's what I've been told. He also says Glastonbury is/would be based on how the album does. That doesn't stack up to me, unless it was a 2028 thing. I suppose that could stack up, i.e a verbal agreement for 2028, but still seems a bit of an odd approach. I would personally still expect it to be 2027 alongside the stadium gigs, IF they are gonna do it, though I've still not got a Scooby when the album is gonna drop, only that the tour is due for Spring (or early) next year.   Interesting, nonetheless.   https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaOB3Q9qkwW/
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...