Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2013-2014


Guest kaosmark2

Recommended Posts

This makes me sad... (was also shown on the screens at the Boleyn Ground on Saturday to!)...Way to go in motivating and supporting your own player to!

I'm almost shocked they didn't decide to use a picture of the "superstars"

Ticketing_City_Boxoffice_v1.jpg

Edited by LondonTom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

honestly can't believe some of the knee jerking going on over utd after 6 games. You wouldn't think Moyes had the best record against city before yesterday and fergie also got stuffed by city. In my opinion last year greatly flattered utd by van persies amazing form and their two closest rivals being unsettled. I think fergie knew exactly what he was doing getting out when he did. Young was shocking, Ferdinand has lost pace and I've never rated wellbeck. I'd at least give Moyes time to built his own team and equally as I expect utd to be back in for baines in Jan and jags and distin the wrong side of 30 judge Martinez when he has to build his own defence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man United won't win the league, it's tough to call this year but it won't be them. If Ferguson was there I wouldn't rule it out since he had a certain factor about him. Say what you want about him, he was a brilliant manager. But finishing outside the top four? Behave. Van Persie, Rooney, Carrick, Vidic and De Gea are all good enough to get them there.

Re: Arsenal. People are saying they won't need a striker, as Walcott will apparently be world class in a few year's time. But I'm not sure how people can rely on possibility and speculation. Wenger has always been quite stubborn in his principles, that he doesn't want to be succesful and buy his way to the top like the big spenders Man United, Man City and Chelsea, and fair play to him because I'd rather see a team win the league without spending a lot, but in this day and age, if you want to show ambition, you have to get the chequebook out. Which he already has with Ozil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I dont think there is mass confidence regarding Walcott, he is a player that divides opinion. What he lacks in his game means he will never be world class, however the premiership have had loads of successful forwards who did not reach world class status either.

Hmmm, not sure about that ... but then again I'm a big fan of Walcott.

There's no doubt that he has plenty of bad moments (such as when he kept getting thru on goal in the last week somewhen and not scoring), but he also has the ability to turn a game like few other players.

It's worth remembering that he was late to football so I reckon he'll peak later than many people are thinking, which means there's still plenty of improvement to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man United won't win the league, it's tough to call this year but it won't be them. If Ferguson was there I wouldn't rule it out since he had a certain factor about him. Say what you want about him, he was a brilliant manager. But finishing outside the top four? Behave. Van Persie, Rooney, Carrick, Vidic and De Gea are all good enough to get them there.

Re: Arsenal. People are saying they won't need a striker, as Walcott will apparently be world class in a few year's time. But I'm not sure how people can rely on possibility and speculation. Wenger has always been quite stubborn in his principles, that he doesn't want to be succesful and buy his way to the top like the big spenders Man United, Man City and Chelsea, and fair play to him because I'd rather see a team win the league without spending a lot, but in this day and age, if you want to show ambition, you have to get the chequebook out. Which he already has with Ozil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

But finishing outside the top four? Behave. Van Persie, Rooney, Carrick, Vidic and De Gea are all good enough to get them there.

there's a difference between being good enough to get them there and actually getting them there.

(just to make it clear, I'm not saying that Utd will fail to get top 4, just that there's no guarantee).

How much those players are able to do is not merely related to the skills they might hold. It's about how well those skills are applied within the team framework that is football (where more than just their own skills come into play), and it's about the comparable strengths in other teams.

Utd might be the defending champions, but as far as individual skills go in the teams as they stand now, they're defo bettered by City, Chelsea and Spurs, and a more-than-reasonable case could be made for Arsenal and Liverpool at least matching them.

The only thing which will decide who comes out on top is the application of those skills by each whole team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welll, How bad are United? Or maybe not that, how about, How good was Fergie?

United were woeful, well, West Brom were brilliant today, and deserved the 3 points, that goal by Amalfitano was just a pearler and Sessegnon's wasn't too bad either!

Moyes tried to get away with what Fergie used to to, and rest a few players, but really he doesn't have that talent at his disposal, unfortunate for Hernandez and Kagawa, cause i certainly rate them more than Welbeck and Young/Nani/Anderson/Cleverley etc!

Chelsea 1-1 with Spurs, Torres dismissal was ludicrous, and the referee was wrong to send him off.

City losing 3-2, i've heard Villa were wonderful, and as much as i don't like Villa, I admire the way Lambert has stuck with kids, farmed out the older players, and they're still grinding out results.

Don't need to say anything about Arsenal do i? Another win, when all the other potential title chasers on the day dropped points, is more or less perfect for them!

Southampton got lucky, they may have dominated, but that was a stonewall penalty for Chamakh, and that could have changed the complexion, of the game completely.

West ham apparently battered Hull in the second half, but when you have no strikers, or at least good ones, you're in trouble!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stonewall dive for chamakh. Please watch it bobs embarrassing. We are 2 points clear and apart from the game against the other mob we haven't hit top gear yet. I'm not getting carried away-far from it, however we have Santi, chamberlain, Rosicky, Podolslski and Walcott to come back in the next few weeks. If we can be within touching distance in January the title rakce will be interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...