Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

pulp


Guest LEDZEP66

Recommended Posts

I would love if Pulp headline! As I've just said 2 my friend! My top 3 bands are Blur, Madness and Pulp! Pulp are the only band that I've yet to see so I Hope they play this year! :D xxx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 681
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This would be excellent. I really hope they headline the Other. I'm not electrified about any of the mooted Pyramid headliners this year (apart from Prince, which I think is becoming increasingly unlikely) so would like to see at least one good headline set at one of the bigger stages. This would put a very big tick in that box very nicely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it overly pedantic to point out that the "original lineup" split sometime in the late 70s when they were still at school and that it would be more accurate to refer to them as the classic lineup?

If theres even the slightest chance that they'll be there I may cry at the fact I don't have a Glasto ticket :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always been surprised that Pulp have so much love on here, but was never sure if it was just "a few" rather than the majority. Obviously can see from this thread that most think they'd headline, which still surprises me to some extents.

I only know a few Pulp songs, but after all the love on here I got the Greatest Hits album a while back and have listened to it a fair bit recently (don't know if it is the best place to start or not), but still only "know" Common People, Disco 2000, Help The Aged, Misshapes (although having a quick scan at Last.fm Babies is also up there.

As an additional aside, from looking at Last.fm they only have 13.3million plays, which is pretty low. Do most of the people on here who think that they should only headline the Pyramid ones who saw them in 1995 and 1998 so know more about them, than they'd possibly be known in the mainstream?

(Last.fm obviously isn't 100% accurate as it's worldwide appeal which gets the plays, but if you look through mooted headliners the mainstream acts usually push up to the kind of levels you'd expect).

I'm likely to see them I'd say, but will depend what slot and who they're against.

Edited by 1mills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a massive understatement - last.fm or whatever is basically irrelevant to this discussion.

While I'm sure that they've had some success abroad, Pulp are a very British band, moreso than any previous Pyramid headliners I can think of. I'd overanalyze it more, but just sound pretentious - you've heard the songs.

Edited by 1mills
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Pulp and am over the moon that they are reforming. I really hope they play glasto next year too.

I'm surprised they have been put on the rumours list on the Pyramid stage though. I think they are more suited to headlining the Other Stage personally. I'm assuming Neil has got some inside info to suggest the pyramid.

I'd love to see them headline it but would be surprised to see it if we do get U2/Coldplay/Prince etc turning up. None of them would 'lower themselves' play before Pulp, their egos couldn't take it.

Either way it's all good news that Pulp are getting back together. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry that's what I was trying to say in I know that Last.fm is more of a worldwide appeal when judging overall plays, so it doesn't really count, but the play count on Pulp does seem quite low even for a "British only band" that are that massive they could ONLY headline the Pyramid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I'm surprised they have been put on the rumours list on the Pyramid stage though. I think they are more suited to headlining the Other Stage personally. I'm assuming Neil has got some inside info to suggest the pyramid.

I initially did put them against the other stage, but after a bit of consideration moved them to Pyramid.

I reckon there's as much if not more chance of them playing the Pyramid than the other stage, and I'm along way from ruling them out as being a possible headliner. In many ways they're too small to headline, while in other ways they're eminently suitable as headliner.

IMO, they're certainly a more suitable headline band for Glastonbury than Take That.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Money, of course.

The "reform rule" is in play. They want the money.

But I also think they'll want Glastonbury too (and have info to back that up) - after all, it was rumours of them reforming for Glasto which cropped up about a year ago that have probably been the driving force behind actually reforming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to be really really nit-picking but V96 was never called V96. Being a saddo I've kept all my gig tickets and the first year Virgin sponsored a music event at Hylands Park Chelmsford in 1996 all the ticket showed was Pulp as headliners. Yes it was sponsored by Vigin Cola and had (at least) 2 stages but it was billed as just a Pulp gig.

As a matter of interest the next year it was billed as V97 and run on the same format.

Extreme nit-picking over!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I initially did put them against the other stage, but after a bit of consideration moved them to Pyramid.

I reckon there's as much if not more chance of them playing the Pyramid than the other stage, and I'm along way from ruling them out as being a possible headliner. In many ways they're too small to headline, while in other ways they're eminently suitable as headliner.

IMO, they're certainly a more suitable headline band for Glastonbury than Take That.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I know, but what I don't get is why Wireless would want them when they could book a more contemporary act to bring in just as many people for less money, especially if their facebook page is an accurate representation of their established customer base. I much prefer Pulp doing Wireless and presumably Glasto over doing some UK exclusive at R/L or V, don't get me wrong, I'm just curious.

I understand where you're coming from, but I doubt there's any act they could get any cheaper which will bring in as many punters. While Pulp weren't a mega-act in their day, there's people now who didn't have the chance to see them in their day, so there's ten+ years of 'new' fans for them to attract.

People are attracted to a fest via the line-up - so if those people are saying they don't like Pulp, they're very unlikely to shell out their money to see a band who they don't like. Of course there'll be other acts on the bill, but those other acts are likely to be ones with a close-ish fit to pulp - so those people probably won't like those either.

Anyway, there's stuff (including stuff I've not said here, and won't) that strongly implies they'll be doing glasto, so I'm very confident (tho not 100% certain) they'll be seen at Worthy Farm in June. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand where you're coming from, but I doubt there's any act they could get any cheaper which will bring in as many punters. While Pulp weren't a mega-act in their day, there's people now who didn't have the chance to see them in their day, so there's ten+ years of 'new' fans for them to attract.

People are attracted to a fest via the line-up - so if those people are saying they don't like Pulp, they're very unlikely to shell out their money to see a band who they don't like. Of course there'll be other acts on the bill, but those other acts are likely to be ones with a close-ish fit to pulp - so those people probably won't like those either.

Anyway, there's stuff (including stuff I've not said here, and won't) that strongly implies they'll be doing glasto, so I'm very confident (tho not 100% certain) they'll be seen at Worthy Farm in June. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, there's stuff (including stuff I've not said here, and won't) that strongly implies they'll be doing glasto, so I'm very confident (tho not 100% certain) they'll be seen at Worthy Farm in June. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...