Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Poppy Fascism?


Guest TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 256
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I would have observed the silence, but since I was in work, speaking to a weeping woman who had just received a large bill in her dead husband's name, which she couldn't afford to pay, I didn't deem it appropriate to put her on hold while I observed the 2 minute silence to respect the dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have observed the silence, but since I was in work, speaking to a weeping woman who had just received a large bill in her dead husband's name, which she couldn't afford to pay, I didn't deem it appropriate to put her on hold while I observed the 2 minute silence to respect the dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I nearly did a 'Phil' on Sunday.

Was in Sainsburys buying stuff for breakfast when they announced they would be observing a 2 minute silence shortly. I didn't have my phone on me to find out the exact time it currently was!

I didn't want to hang about incase I had 15 minutes or so to wait for it, so dashed for the tills with what I had in my basket and did the beep beep thing.

Only when I was in the middle of doing that, I half expected them to then announce the silence.. luckily I got away with it and got out to the car to find it was still only 10:50am :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I nearly did a 'Phil' on Sunday.

Was in Sainsburys buying stuff for breakfast when they announced they would be observing a 2 minute silence shortly. I didn't have my phone on me to find out the exact time it currently was!

I didn't want to hang about incase I had 15 minutes or so to wait for it, so dashed for the tills with what I had in my basket and did the beep beep thing.

Only when I was in the middle of doing that, I half expected them to then announce the silence.. luckily I got away with it and got out to the car to find it was still only 10:50am :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

never mind putting someone on hold, I took a day off to look for the cat. I've taken several days off to take her to the vet's, because I don't trust the old man to tell the vet everything. He's very much an advocate of positive thinking, otherwise known as ignore it and hope it goes away.

I'm getting more conservative as I get older - I would never have bought a red poppy in my younger days, as a pacifist I've bought a white one before.

But these days I feel more respect for those who have given their lives for their ideals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I nearly did a 'Phil' on Sunday.

Was in Sainsburys buying stuff for breakfast when they announced they would be observing a 2 minute silence shortly. I didn't have my phone on me to find out the exact time it currently was!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We tried to do the silence at work, but when you're at a busy children's indoor play and party centre it doesn't always work. The majority did do it, and many parents did get their kids to be quiet during that time, which i respect, however there was one toddler who in the middle of it all shouted "mummy! i need a wee!" at the top of his voice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O LORDY MAMA... I rest my case! Shopping---in Sainsburys!! Eeee lad...how do people do it???

And--yet another sign of the times... whats happened to watches...and immortal words such as "Excuse me, what time is it please?

den

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been giving some thought to what I think you could call my casual indifference to this. I think the problem is it's too far removed and too big for me to really get my head around and properly relate to.

A war memorial in a small town or village with list of names with the same surname or the mining disaster memorials we see round here with similar lists of names will make me stop and think a moment though.

There's a small town in the Borders that I used to visit quite regularly, like a lot of these places they have their annual tradition where all the men ride out to check the borough boundaries for incursions (there used to be a lot of that sort of thing). Obviously it couldn't continue during the wars since all the men were away fighting - and the horses in WWI - but also after the war because the men that went away didn't come back.

That's the sort of thing that I can relate to and give my 2 minutes silence for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been giving some thought to what I think you could call my casual indifference to this. I think the problem is it's too far removed and too big for me to really get my head around and properly relate to.

A war memorial in a small town or village with list of names with the same surname or the mining disaster memorials we see round here with similar lists of names will make me stop and think a moment though.

There's a small town in the Borders that I used to visit quite regularly, like a lot of these places they have their annual tradition where all the men ride out to check the borough boundaries for incursions (there used to be a lot of that sort of thing). Obviously it couldn't continue during the wars since all the men were away fighting - and the horses in WWI - but also after the war because the men that went away didn't come back.

That's the sort of thing that I can relate to and give my 2 minutes silence for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Just thought I would ressurect this, especially after all the over reaction with FIFA.

This is the first year that I have not bought a Poppy, and I have been amazed how many people have fallen out with me over it. In the past I was happy to give to a charity that supported people that had no choice but to fight (conscription, National Service etc. However over the next few years all of these people will dying off, and to be fair what we are going to be left with are people that made a clear choice to make the military a career. I am becoming concerned that joining the military means that you are a better citizen, something along the lines of "Starship Troopers". From my experience it is a rare thing to meet anyone that has joined up serve their Country, yet we told that they are serving for "us".

As dangerous jobs go, being a soldier is never at the top of lists (Google if you wish). I would rather give my money to a cause that either promotes peace or one that supports people that die in dreadful minimum wage jobs, like those miners in Wales.

Now don't get me wrong I am not saying that ex-servicemen don't deserve support if they have sefvice related issues. However I think it should be the Government as an employer that provides these services, and that should be integrated into the present social welfare system. This could be easily affordable if the military was rationalised for the real reason it is there for, defence, and not to continue some vestige of Empire that quite frankly this country needs to get away from.

Edited by Rufus Gwertigan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

A nicely worded and thought-thru post Rufus, especially given your background as ex-military.

I've been disgusted by the pressure that Dave Moron and co have put on FIFA, without any regard for how England's opposition might feel about taking part in a British demonstration of nationalism. Just consider how the England team of 1937(?) that played in Germany and gave a Nazi salute are ridiculed. But of course, us Brits are only ever good.

Football matches are sport for sport's sake, nothing else. I'm similarly disgusted by how recent England matches have become a celebration of 'our boys', with parades of servicemen as a part of the 'spectacle'. It's so like the dictator-led 'banana republics' or the condemnation we used to give the 'the Eastern Bloc' for similar it makes me want to puke.

And then just yesterday, 'Muslims against Crusades' are banned as "terrorists", clearly (given the date of the banning) only because of the fuss their demonstration will cause. We condemn Gaddaffi and al-Assad for not allowing peaceful protests, and yet do exactly the same.

To quote Teresa May yesterday: Most recently, it has been involved in potential stand-offs with the English Defence League and it also demonstrated outside the US Embassy on the 10th anniversary of 9/11. Heinous terrorist acts, I'm sure you'll agree. ;)

I'm tempted to set up a group called "Athieists and Christians against Crusades" and go burn some poppies, because it might surprise Dave Moron and the unthinking morons who back his stance to realise that not every born and bred British citizen believes that it should be a national trait to celebrate govt-approved mass slaughter on a scale not hugely dissimilar to Hitler's, with the 'moral justification' for that slaughter absolutely no different to Hitler's.

Like you Rufus, I have huge sympathy for the conscripts forced to fight in those wars, while also believing that (say) any nurse "serves the nation" far more than soldier-by-choice.

I'm not anti-all-wars. I am anti the celebration of war with a one-sided view. The death of a German or Iraqi or Afghani as the result of war is no less sad than the death of a Brit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Any suggestion of burning a poppy turns my stomach...

People can protest anything they want in my eyes. But is burning poppies and purposely not allowing others to have two minute silence a real protest or is just incitement / being a bit of a c**t.

Its about having just a tiny little bit of respect for your fellow man in my eyes.

Having respect for what those soldiers fought for would include the freedom to protest, no matter how much you might disagree with what the protest is over or how they might (peacefully, don't forget!) carry it out.

Banning such a protest is essentially saying to those old soldiers "we told you that you were fighting for freedom, but we lied. Your death was pointless, because the country you fought for has taken away the freedom you fought for".

Try putting down your jingoism and start joining up the dots instead!!

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...