Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2010-2011


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

Tim Payton (who's on the board of Arsenal Supporters Trust) says Arsenal's stadium deal is £2.8m p/a.

Agree with what he's saying about FFP though.

Is it acceptable then to change name of team, too? Presuming all in favour of Etihad Stadium would be fine with Etihad City as name of team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    2125

  • ampersand

    1135

  • The Nal

    1089

  • TheGayTent

    766

there is big debate going on if Etihad means "united" in Arabic :P from the mirror:

James Hogan, CEO of Etihad Airways, stressed the correct translation of Etihad was ‘Union’ not ‘United’.

But experts on Arabic were divided on the issue. Mohammed Nizami, from the Manchester City council translation service, said the correct translation was ‘Unity’.

When asked if the word could also mean ‘United’ he said: “Yes, it can also stand for union,alliance, friendship and united.”

Yusuf Bagail, from the Alfikr Arabic School at the Yemeni Community Association in Salford, said: “It does mean ‘United’ in Arabic. It means, literally, ‘United’.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While Delaware companies might not be in the relevant financial loop currently, I'm sure there's plenty of ways they could be used to FFP rule advantage if Utd was so inclined.

Off the top of my head, a less transparent thing might be to grant those companies certain licencing rights, which can then be exploited outside of UEFA's sight. Or completely hidden for the details, the payments that Utd make up the chain that are ultimately used to service the debt could be increased so that some of the money was being used to pay players (and so showing lower wage costs in the visible UK companies). While some of the details might be a bit fiddly to achieve in an accounting sense, it only takes a glance at the more normal multi-national companies to see that (say) a million quid's worth of costs in doing something like these pays back big time.

These are the sorts of things that dodgy accountants live for. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

and what independent auditors are for too, no?

it might be what they're there for, it's not something they do well at all - particularly when you consider that if they expose a problem they're talking themselves out of the auditing job.

There's a mass of examples that are both widely publicly known (eg: Enron) as well as constant smaller ones that rarely come to public attention that could be raised which prove this happens all the time.

Had a brief look at the regs; club has to outline whole group (up to ultimate parent & subsidiaries (unless unrelated to football)) and group accounts as whole, plus get them signed off by an independent auditor. As such, no benefit for FFP reasons, in having the company hidden in Delaware over having the accounts in the public domain (companies house etc). Either way, accounts are submitted by the company and audited.

"unless unrelated to football" - a hole that's just waiting to be exploited.

For example, I know that Chelsea has companies for 'Chelsea Village', which is completely unrelated to the football side of things. Yet it still falls within the same ultimate parent company as the football side of things, and so is able to be used to manipulate the accounts of the football side, if Chelsea were so inclined.

And it turns out that Chelsea ARE so inclined (at one level of dodgy dealings anyway, tho not at dodgy as it could be [from what's known right now, anyway]), because they've transferred a debt that's indisputably about the football side of things (Roman's huge player spends) away from the football companies but still within the overall group of companies.

As an aside, not completely sure but don't think United have made any payments up the chain since the takeover other than a £10m loan. No dividends been taken yet in the Glazer reign and the PIKS were left alone each year (Interest added each year and compounded). The club have covered the primary bank debt (and now bonds) incurred due to the leveraged buyout and the refinancing costs.

What they might have done to-date says nothing about what they might choose to do in the future.

And while (say) Utd might intend on being true to the FFP rules in both practice and spirit, I'd say they'd be hugely unlikely to stick to that intention once they become aware that the rules can be successfully bent and that other clubs are bending them - and there's absolutely no doubt in my mind that some clubs will bend them. There's no accountant on earth who doesn't intend to use any weakness in the rules they work to to their advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all those interested in the npower Championship and/or Reading FC and Leicester City FC, Matt Mills has gone to Leicester for 'More than £5m'. Good player, but Reading will still run riot with McAnuff signing a new contract and Shane Long going for no less than £10m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all those interested in the npower Championship and/or Reading FC and Leicester City FC, Matt Mills has gone to Leicester for 'More than £5m'. Good player, but Reading will still run riot with McAnuff signing a new contract and Shane Long going for no less than £10m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leicester are signing Konchesky - on wages of 40k a week.

Absolutely batshit crazy. Portsmouth Mk II.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their new plan seems to be buying everyone so nobody else has any players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They definitely needed numbers so I think Bruce has done quite well. Gardner, Larsson, Ji and Elmohamady signed up aswell all for about £10m all in.

Don't think Gibson's finalised yet btw. Seems to be delaying over contract terms and think Stoke supposedly interested. Did wonder if Gardner signing would end the interest in Gibson. Both like a crack from outside the box to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

£5m for Mills - utter madness. We put a £3m bid in, but didn't move from that figure. Then Leicester started bidding against themselves, nudging their own accepted fee (£3.5m) up past the £4.5m mark! :lol:

I'd have liked Mills at our place, but £5m?! F**k right off.

I'm just hoping Johnson signs for us tomorrow. He should do, but it seems that his agent has ndeliberately leaked the news to get more offers before he signs on the dotted line so it's by no means a done deal.

Mills @ £5m or Johnson @ £7m? A no-brainer.

Basically, if Leicester don't go up this season, they're screwed. And apparently, they've bid £4.5m for Nicky Maynard!!

Edited by Banana Co
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you lot might buy or bid for Shane Long from us; McCarthy loves to have an Irish player from Reading, Haha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are interested and have had a bid accepted I think so its doing the rounds and we are only willing to pay 30k a week and Gibson wants 40k!

Also Stoke Sign Woodgate on a Pay as you play deal for a year think its a cracking signing on a free if he can stay fit and still after Dann and Jerome as well!

Cole Bid accepted 4mill rising to 6mill apparently doesnt want to move out of London thank god as I think you are a donkey sir!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see that Aldershot won 3 – 0 last night. :D

Ok so it was only a friendly against Tamworth, but it was a win, an unusual occurrence. :ph34r:

Did we not know this Neil ? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I see that Aldershot won 3 – 0 last night. :D

Ok so it was only a friendly against Tamworth, but it was a win, an unusual occurrence. :ph34r:

Did we not know this Neil ? :P

I did. Don't you follow your team? :P

Far better than beating Tamworth was spanking Farnborough 4-0. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...