Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

General News Discussion


Guest Atlanteanlost

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin

Considering what is going on in Greece and its potential for it to get worse, for the the old conflicts to remerge between countries... I think that is really short sighted...

and yet, if there wasn't the EU, who knows what might have kicked off already?

At least the EU provides easy channels of communications between nations, which gives them a chance of sorting things out. It wouldn't be so easy if they weren't used to collaberating on an daily basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Don't get me wrong... I am a big fan of the EU but things are taking a ugly turn at the moment...

yep, but

even the best marriages aren't all just happily ever after. Sometimes there's a bit of conflict, but it doesn't have to mean that divorce and a post-divorce war are the certain result of any conflict.

------

I'm angry already at the plans to 'celebrate' the start of WW1.

First off the govt have no problem finding huge chunks of money for any of their pet projects in this "age of austerity" when Britian is supposedly facing "terrible debt problems" where "we're all in this together", but nothing which helps support people in need is sacrosanct.

And secondly, it's been announced as being about "remembering their sacrifice" and nothing about about how a million young men were sent off to be unnecessarily slaughtered in support of the aristocracy.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Poppy Day is a fitting tribute to sacrifice / the loss, outside of that, and the money it raises, I don't want anything further...

acc

according to the justification Dave Moron is putting forwards, 69% of people want 2014 to have a special commemoration of some kind, and an extra public holiday on 11/11 is being talked about.

I'm guessing that they polled the tory party to get that 69%.

And while everyone is always up for an extra holiday, it's weird that Dave Moron is happy to throw away a couple of billion pounds every few years for an extra holiday for things close to the tories heart, and yet it won't work to tax the rich more, but cutting from subsistence level of benefits is easily achievable and an absolute financial necessity.

And people mindlessly nod along, believing the lies about a debt crisis. It's just an excuse for the tories to rip this country apart as they've always wanted, and no one seems to care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

acc

according to the justification Dave Moron is putting forwards, 69% of people want 2014 to have a special commemoration of some kind, and an extra public holiday on 11/11 is being talked about.

I'm guessing that they polled the tory party to get that 69%.

And while everyone is always up for an extra holiday, it's weird that Dave Moron is happy to throw away a couple of billion pounds every few years for an extra holiday for things close to the tories heart, and yet it won't work to tax the rich more, but cutting from subsistence level of benefits is easily achievable and an absolute financial necessity.

And people mindlessly nod along, believing the lies about a debt crisis. It's just an excuse for the tories to rip this country apart as they've always wanted, and no one seems to care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many wars have there been between European member states? 0.

Considering Europe had been dominated by a huge number of bloody conflicts up until the EU's inception, this is a remarkable achievement.

Say what you want about the EU but you can not deny it has been very important in bringing stability to Europe, and each and every one of us should be thankful for that.

There isn't an institution that deserves it more in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many wars have there been between European member states? 0.

Considering Europe had been dominated by a huge number of bloody conflicts up until the EU's inception, this is a remarkable achievement.

Say what you want about the EU but you can not deny it has been very important in bringing stability to Europe, and each and every one of us should be thankful for that.

There isn't an institution that deserves it more in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was interested in Farage's interview yesterday where he mentions that he has friends who are left wing, though he is more free market, he is happy to disagree with them and have a pint afterwards whilst the people at the top of the EU he believes are fundamentally bad people who's sole aim to to dismantle democracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

But you cant say that is mainly due to the EU. The Cold War, NATO and the militarisation of Germany during that time have played major roles.

yup. Europe had stayed war-free for a while before the treaty of rome. Just sick of war.

I guess the really dangerous moment the EU helped to manage was the collapse of the soviet union. That could have got a bit tricky I reckon, because lots of states still have half an eye on territory within neighbouring states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I was interested in Farage's interview yesterday where he mentions that he has friends who are left wing, though he is more free market, he is happy to disagree with them and have a pint afterwards whilst the people at the top of the EU he believes are fundamentally bad people who's sole aim to to dismantle democracy.

From one angle he's right. But it's not the conspiracy that he sees it as.

The central element of the EU - it's very purpose - isn't up for debate. These countries came together to create a customs union, followed by a free-trade area, followed by a currency union (which those who didn't go into accepted the existence of).... and perhaps/probably a federal europe as the logical and practical conclusion of that process.

So there's no vote to be had over any of that in the European Parliament, because it's all been agreed by each country's leader in a treaty.

Farange wants everything those treaties stand for to be up for a vote. And every day if/until the vote goes his way. ;)

He's failed to recognise that he's made himself pointless by his whole stance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely the main reason for European peace is no one can afford a proper war since WWII ? Europe basically got rid of everything it gained during the industrial revolution in fire arms. (...at least thats my sort of basic understanding of the last 100 years or so of european history.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The central element of the EU - it's very purpose - isn't up for debate. These countries came together to create a customs union, followed by a free-trade area, followed by a currency union (which those who didn't go into accepted the existence of).... and perhaps/probably a federal europe as the logical and practical conclusion of that process.

So there's no vote to be had over any of that in the European Parliament, because it's all been agreed by each country's leader in a treaty.

Edited by lost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely the main reason for European peace is no one can afford a proper war since WWII ? Europe basically got rid of everything it gained during the industrial revolution in fire arms. (...at least thats my sort of basic understanding of the last 100 years or so of european history.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

indeed, in the case of Italy the EU needed to remove the democratically elected leader of the country and replace him with their choice of leader because the people were too stupid to release austerity was the answer and would of kept voting themselves more freebies bankrupting the country, obviously somethings are too important to leave open to democracy. Just a shame they couldn't of got to Gordon Brown first.

yeah, cos his budget planning within the context of the time was just dreadful, eh?

So very dreadful that Dave Moron and Slimy Gideon said they'd stick to his budget plans, that's how bad they were. :lol:

Gordon fucked up in plenty of places, but spending money we didn't have* wasn't one of them. It only became that when the world woke up to the fact that it had been playing fantasy economics - and it was the raving-right free-marketeers who hold sole responsibility for those fantasy economics, not Gordon**.

(*at least, nothing outside the standard public sector borrowing)

(** his failing was failing to spot it was fantasy economics - but very few people did).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...