Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Kasabian


Guest bob parkhurst

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I loved them this year and they had a f**king massive crowd, Fire was a bit good.

Maybe if they hadn't played this year they could have been in with a shout of headlining the Pyramid on one of the days (maybe the Friday) as they must now surely be big enough and have enough songs.

Perhaps in 2011 it will happen, especially if they show they can headline Festivals next year what with them wanting to headline T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I loved them this year and they had a f**king massive crowd, Fire was a bit good.

Maybe if they hadn't played this year they could have been in with a shout of headlining the Pyramid on one of the days (maybe the Friday) as they must now surely be big enough and have enough songs.

Perhaps in 2011 it will happen, especially if they show they can headline Festivals next year what with them wanting to headline T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

meh...i dont think they will ever be big enough to be a headliner...

they have alreay released some pretty big songs, but seem to have the problem of having 2 good songs per album with filler..

Don't see why they would get the nod over someone like snow patrol to waste a headline slot...they have played way too many times for their own good recently....

Snow Patrol Kasabian KOL, probably the worst ever headliners for a festival is what i predict for T/oxygen

Compare that to what we had this year, blur bruce neil young......I seriously doubt they will come close to that but if its set as a standard for the future, then Kasabian hopefully will never ever ever ever ever come close to wasting a headline slot.....

but hey...there is always 30 other stages or whatever :P Just think it would be a step back for them..they could headline other stage though....and people would love it......i definately think they have overdone it with glastonbury, terrible management from their management team, granted they get alot of people listening to their music, but now alot of people see them as a could have been great band instead of a great band

Link to comment
Share on other sites

srvman I just can't agree with you at all. I think they are getting better all the time and they are hugely popular.

You only have to look at the fact that tickets for their gigs have been changing hands at nearly twice the price of Arctic Monkeys despite the fact that there have been far more Kasabian gigs recently

I think headlining the Other Stage would be the right slot for them. You will see them steadily improving and one day will headline the Main Stage.

They put on a brilliant show - IMO they were 10 times better than the Boss last year (just getting my coat)

Can't wait to see them in Manchester in a week or so

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty confident they won't be at Glastonbury next year for the reasons mentioned above about them being 2nd from top headliners on the Pyramid twice in the last 3 years.

They would probably be nailed on for next year, if the "4th headliner" for last year hadn't pulled out, which meant they played the slot under Springsteen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

meh...i dont think they will ever be big enough to be a headliner...

they have alreay released some pretty big songs, but seem to have the problem of having 2 good songs per album with filler..

Don't see why they would get the nod over someone like snow patrol to waste a headline slot...they have played way too many times for their own good recently....

Snow Patrol Kasabian KOL, probably the worst ever headliners for a festival is what i predict for T/oxygen

Compare that to what we had this year, blur bruce neil young......I seriously doubt they will come close to that but if its set as a standard for the future, then Kasabian hopefully will never ever ever ever ever come close to wasting a headline slot.....

but hey...there is always 30 other stages or whatever :P Just think it would be a step back for them..they could headline other stage though....and people would love it......i definately think they have overdone it with glastonbury, terrible management from their management team, granted they get alot of people listening to their music, but now alot of people see them as a could have been great band instead of a great band

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i love Kasabian they are one of the best live acts i've seen and i've seen them between 15-20 times.

but they were piss poor at glasto this year and average the two other times i saw them this year and their new found arrogance and posturing is begining to do my head in, even more so since Oasis split and they feel they have to fill the void left by the dickhead gallagher brothers.

Edited by .jay.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i love Kasabian they are one of the best live acts i've seen and i've seen them between 15-20 times.

but they were piss poor at glasto this year and average the two other times i saw them this year and their new found arrogance and posturing is begining to do my head in, even more so since Oasis split and they feel they have to fill the void left by the dickhead gallagher brothers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally i think they haven't done anything decent since their first album, the singer comes across as a Liam Gallagher wannabie and they now attract the Oasis lad 'what you looking at?' element.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i love Kasabian they are one of the best live acts i've seen and i've seen them between 15-20 times.

but they were piss poor at glasto this year and average the two other times i saw them this year and their new found arrogance and posturing is begining to do my head in, even more so since Oasis split and they feel they have to fill the void left by the dickhead gallagher brothers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally i think they haven't done anything decent since their first album, the singer comes across as a Liam Gallagher wannabie and they now attract the Oasis lad 'what you looking at?' element.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great band and thought they were fantastic when they supported Oasis in june. Have also seen them at leeds uni on the empire tour and the whole venue was rocking for that. New album is their best too I'd say. Have always thought the other two had a bit of filler tracks for my liking but apart from 1 maybe 2 this new album is great. (dobermans still their best track)

They won't play for the reasons mentioned but the next time they do I can easily see them headlining . The latest tour has sold extremly well and thats even after playing to about 750,000 people at Oasis' gigs and their own tour in the middle of it. The albums still in the charts too and i reckon their going from strength to strength. If you were going to compare them to KOL, at the same stage halfway through 3rd album tour, I'd say Kasabian were bigger and have had bigger hits than them, and they headlined at the start of their 4th album tour.

and Bob newcastle arena does not hold 40 odd thousand people :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kasabian? you mean the "I'll always remember who i had to stand through before springsteen came on at glastonbury" band?

why would you want to see them next year at Glasto? coz you missed them at glasto in 04, 05, 06, 07, 08 and 09 and are worried you'll miss them in 2011 and '12?

some decent tunes, but lead singer is an absolute twat and needs to realize he isn't part of a band that has 2 great albums like "Definitely Maybe" and "What's the Story..." under their belt, but in fact is with a band that has just a handful of decent songs that just so happen to sound better live than on the record

I could picture the Boss watching the tv coverage before he came on, laughing and commenting "who the f**k is this idiot?", with his silly lines like "Glastonbury!!! you're on fire!!!" - what a tosser. pathetic haircut too.

serge is cool though.

o.k...post sent...awaiting the bottling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kasabian? you mean the "I'll always remember who i had to stand through before springsteen came on at glastonbury" band?

why would you want to see them next year at Glasto? coz you missed them at glasto in 04, 05, 06, 07, 08 and 09 and are worried you'll miss them in 2011 and '12?

some decent tunes, but lead singer is an absolute twat and needs to realize he isn't part of a band that has 2 great albums like "Definitely Maybe" and "What's the Story..." under their belt, but in fact is with a band that has just a handful of decent songs that just so happen to sound better live than on the record

I could picture the Boss watching the tv coverage before he came on, laughing and commenting "who the f**k is this idiot?", with his silly lines like "Glastonbury!!! you're on fire!!!" - what a tosser. pathetic haircut too.

serge is cool though.

o.k...post sent...awaiting the bottling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I enjoyed them this year, although it was in broad daylight with the sun out and they strike me as the sort of band who would be much better in darkness.

I was supposed to be seeing them in Sheffield but something came up and I can't any more. Shame as I was quite looking forward to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...