Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Boycott 2010 is something isn't done!


Guest kyjenni

Recommended Posts

Awww

All my married friends act the filthy big man.. till the Missus arrives and it's "ooh hello dear, need a foot rub?"

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 339
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

whoa ..... you have loads of words, but they're ultimately no less negative than anything that's being said to you.

You were on/around site for days. You could have packed up some of these tents and made a difference (however small). Did you?

And further .... you moan about your stuff getting chucked out by ######, suggesting that the guy who threw it out had no right to do that. And elsewhere you mention some stuff you picked up from Jazzworld, yet you have no idea if anyone planned to come back for it - much like the guy did who chucked out your stuff.

While you clearly have loads of energy, perhaps it would be worth channelling some of it into rationalising your actions to match your thoughts, and making those thoughts and actions consistent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I STILL dont understand after attending this festival 10 times in 14 years is how and why so many of the regular law abiding citizens that live very normal, day to day, clean, recycling, generally good to your neighbour and fellow man humdrum lives that attend manage to behave in such a way that is quite shocking if it was the RealWorld...I am referring to the littering, the not giving a shit about the neighbours, the land, the owners etc.

Do any of these people young and old live in such ways back in RealWorld...I highly doubt it. I highly doubt any of the selfish folk leave piles of shit everywhere at home, have houses which are covered in crap they cant be bothered to pick up and highly doubt they go around their daily lives with the same f**k off attitude they have when at the festival.

WHY does living in Micheal Eavis' field for 5 days bring this out in such a large number of people? I really really cant understand it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you see that, right there is a huge gulf in our different perceptions. I would say the opposite to you, I'm always surprised at Glastonbury how many people are kind,polite, thoughtful and do more than that need to. You see at as worse behaviour than the 'real world', I see lots of their behaviour as better than they behave in 'the real world'

Perceptions innit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am sure the Eavis family are quaking in their welly boots with the thought zero ticket sales next year. All on the strength of your shitty little campaign/boycott. I think they will really miss you and possibly cancel the whole festival because of you.

Pathetic little boy/girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am sure the Eavis family are quaking in their welly boots with the thought zero ticket sales next year. All on the strength of your shitty little campaign/boycott. I think they will really miss you and possibly cancel the whole festival because of you.

Pathetic little boy/girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what I mean is exactly that, there's no point getting nasty or personal or stroppy or whatever, cos to me it is all about perceptions, for me, the vast majority of people behave in a more considerate way at Glastonbury than they do in the outside worldd, for you they don't. Neither of us has the objective truth there, it's just how we see it, and obviously that affects what we want to do about it, I'd like to bring a little bit of my glastonbury into my outside world, you'd like to bring a little bit of your outside world into your Glastonbury.

It's all cool, just saying what I think

(insert random 'peace' smiley here)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am sure the Eavis family are quaking in their welly boots with the thought zero ticket sales next year. All on the strength of your shitty little campaign/boycott. I think they will really miss you and possibly cancel the whole festival because of you.

Pathetic little boy/girl.

Edited by kyjenni
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Se....told you it was getting nasty! Chill the f**k out guys and stop being so bloody mean. The girl means well and you are just all trolling now. Some good arguments but the rudeness to one another for no other reason than getting on your high horses just cos someone has wanted to speak out over something that ruffled them has to stop. :D

says the girl as she gets on her high horse. :lol:

We all mean well. And we all fail at times.

The "speaking out" is very often as rude as the responses it gets. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also hasten to add that I'm campaigning for the fish in the pond by the stone dragon. One of the stall holders told me that people are pissing in their water. That's just not nice. I would ask how would any of you like it if I came and had a wee on you while you were in the bath but I'm thinking that some of you would be all for that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this girl is 29 years old and only now she has realised the problems with the festival faces in terms of clear up etc? where has she been for the rest of her life?

Forgive me for not seeing her as the messiah just because for the first time in her self absorbed life she has realised what clearing up the festival site entails.

As for her "ideas" they have all been thought of and rejected by people with far more experience than someone who spent couple of days on site being humoured by the people that actually know what they are doing.

Her "campaign" is an utter farce.

Save the festival by boycotting it!? She is insane.

Edited by russycarps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boycotting is not the main plan no! I have a plan, I have many plans but i'm off out in a mo and haven't got the time to go into them on here.

And thanks for the support Bluearsedfly! If that was meant to be a sarcastic response then fine, if a serious one then go do one because I can't be bothered with narrowminded selfish idiots like yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

says the girl as she gets on her high horse. :lol:

We all mean well. And we all fail at times.

The "speaking out" is very often as rude as the responses it gets. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also hasten to add that I'm campaigning for the fish in the pond by the stone dragon. One of the stall holders told me that people are pissing in their water. That's just not nice. I would ask how would any of you like it if I came and had a wee on you while you were in the bath but I'm thinking that some of you would be all for that...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this girl is 29 years old and only now she has realised the problems with the festival faces in terms of clear up etc? where has she been for the rest of her life?

Forgive me for not seeing her as the messiah just because for the first time in her self absorbed life she has realised what clearing up the festival site entails.

As for her "ideas" they have all been thought of and rejected by people with far more experience than someone who spent couple of days on site being humoured by the people that actually know what they are doing.

Her "campaign" is an utter farce.

Save the festival by boycotting it!? She is insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is fair. Plus you could probably find people who'd accept a low wage on the basis that they're "doing good".

I'm a pessimist when it comes to business schemes, which is why I'm not an entrepreneur I guess.

Thinking through our expectations, I guess you'd organise it like this:

If it's dry enough, tents found erected should be finished off (i.e. peg out all the guy lines people usually omit), checked for damage, vacuumed on the inside, any mud hosed off, allowed to dry, then put away and labelled as complete and checked. Probably 30 mins work for two people, £10 labour.

If it's not dry, tents found erected should be taken down, loosely bagged into a sack, and taken to a barn for processing. 20 mins work for 2 people, approx £7 labour.

Unassembled tents go straight to the barn, whatever their condition (unless they're a biohazard).

At the barn, each person takes one tent at a time. If the fabric is badly damaged, throw it away, and sort the poles and pegs etc. for spares. Otherwise pitch the tent, using spares if parts are missing. There may be some head scratching here. 15 mins for two people, £5. Then another 15 mins checking, cleaning, drying and repacking, £5. Total £17.

Where there's minor damage to the fabric, it's extra work to repair the seams etc -- or just bin them.

But that's just labour. Add VAT, insurance, site rental, management (demanding higher pay!) all adds up.

All that's for "proper" tents. Pop up tents I guess would be less effort - check, clean, dry, fold. But I also guess that more of those would be irrepairable and go straight in the bin.

Still I think with the right organisation, it could work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...