Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Boycott 2010 is something isn't done!


Guest kyjenni

Recommended Posts

We had every intention of taking our tent home last year but after wrestling with my sleeping bag for like an hour tryin to get it into a stupid bag my immediate thought was f**k this am away home to sleep and evry1 else agreed.

I dont feel guilty for doing it either, 3 days, no sleep, smelly... give me a break!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 339
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yep. £5 on a second-hand perfectly functioning tent vs. £20 for a new one?

Or £20 on a very nice second-hand perfectly functioning tent that cost over £80 new?

No. You are quite correct. No one ever wants to save money and everyone always buy new tents for under £20.

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. £5 on a second-hand perfectly functioning tent vs. £20 for a new one?

Or £20 on a very nice second-hand perfectly functioning tent that cost over £80 new?

No. You are quite correct. No one ever wants to save money and everyone always buy new tents for under £20.

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so you think people will turn up to glastonbury without a tent, and the first thing they do, whilst still carrying all their luggage, is walk to the 2nd hand tent stall (assuming they can find it) on the off chance they might be able to save 15 or 20 quid? What if they get there and all the tents are sold out?

Or, they could save all this hassle and pay £20 (or less) on a tent before arriving and save themselves an enormous amount effort and uncertainty.

You are as deranged as she is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so you think people will turn up to glastonbury without a tent, and the first thing they do, whilst still carrying all their luggage, is walk to the 2nd hand tent stall (assuming they can find it) on the off chance they might be able to save 15 or 20 quid? What if they get there and all the tents are sold out?

Or, they could save all this hassle and pay £20 (or less) on a tent before arriving and save themselves an enormous amount effort and uncertainty.

You are as deranged as she is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love my Quechua 3 man pop up tent.

If any f**ker tried to dump it after the festival, slash it, wee in it, take a dump in it, vomit over it, try to intravenously inject it, stroke it (it's mine - hands off, punks) or look at it in a funny way, I'll send William of Walworth over with a 300 page dossier on the merits of a dry Glastonbury.

Stay the f**k away from my tent. I love it. And here it is, in all it's glory:

n591785015_1433641_5663.jpg

(That's my wife in that photo by the way. The tent is 50% hers too - and she is one scary lady when angry. You have been warned.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aha. Moving the goalposts I see. An often used tactic of the proven wrong t'interweb user.

Note: I was not agreeing with the OP. I was disagreeing with your absolute and patently wrong claim.

There are ways that recycling and selling on tents could be made to work. But don't bother your brain with trying to ponder that one just continue on with your disposable landfill mindset. There's a good kid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love my Quechua 3 man pop up tent.

If any f**ker tried to dump it after the festival, slash it, wee in it, take a dump in it, vomit over it, try to intravenously inject it, stroke it (it's mine - hands off, punks) or look at it in a funny way, I'll send William of Walworth over with a 300 page dossier on the merits of a dry Glastonbury.

Stay the f**k away from my tent. I love it. And here it is, in all it's glory:

n591785015_1433641_5663.jpg

(That's my wife in that photo by the way. The tent is 50% hers too - and she is one scary lady when angry. You have been warned.)

Edited by sifimaster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
I f**king love you. Where do you live? I want to tickle and hug you.

Notice how it's just a few blokes who are being negative here, I can't work out if it's a defestist attitude or just wanting to start an arguement?

whoa ..... you have loads of words, but they're ultimately no less negative than anything that's being said to you.

You were on/around site for days. You could have packed up some of these tents and made a difference (however small). Did you?

And further .... you moan about your stuff getting chucked out by ######, suggesting that the guy who threw it out had no right to do that. And elsewhere you mention some stuff you picked up from Jazzworld, yet you have no idea if anyone planned to come back for it - much like the guy did who chucked out your stuff.

While you clearly have loads of energy, perhaps it would be worth channelling some of it into rationalising your actions to match your thoughts, and making those thoughts and actions consistent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A fine looking number I think we can all agree. I could quite easily imagine myself pulling open the old flaps and slipping into that, especially when it was wet. I'd even take my boots off.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
However, I wonder whether you could do all the collecting, cleaning, checking, repairing, collating and repacking for less than £30 per tent, while paying a fair UK wage.

to be fair, people could be paid £10 an hour and do all of that and be earning a decent wage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh come off it. I could have written much worse. Like the old thing not being able to handle my immense girth and it being too much of a tight squeeze and how I might have to enter from the rear.

But I didn't want to go off topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh come off it. I could have written much worse. Like the old thing not being able to handle my immense girth and it being too much of a tight squeeze and how I might have to enter from the rear.

But I didn't want to go off topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...