Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Crowdsurfing


Guest glastonbury2008

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It seems like every member on eFestivals doesn't want anyone to do anything remotely fun at Glastonbury. Crowd surfing is part of the whole gig experience in my opinion. No-one ever really gets too injured do they? People need to relax at little bit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been kicked in the face before by these selfish f**kers! Liberal doesn't come into it; it's f**king selfish and antisocial. Why should we have to risk getting twatted in the face if we go near the front? That's like me saying "I'll be at the back, hitting people with a stick. If you don't like it, stay away from the back".

You deserve to be kicked out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some crowd surfers are evil, but most of them are quite benevolent and are just having their way of fun. It's expected down the front of gigs and if you don't like it or get kicked in the head or anything then move backwards or sideways?

To the people who have been kicked in the head by a crowd surfer, unfortunately its quite hard to control whether you glide over someones head or accidently kick them. If you get kicked, then its fair play to shove or hit the surfer i guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nowt wrong with crowd surfing and to be expected down the front of any gig, festival or not in my opinion. I also doubt very much they would kick you out of the festival for it.

I used to crowdsurf back in the day but back in 'my' day was 25 years ago.

Tbh I'm beginning to question the crowd makeup for Glasto. This week alone I have seen threads about no pushing to the front, no talking, no flags, no crowdsurfing. Get a grip people..

I do however agree with no brollies and chairs past the mixing desks though. I think a brolly is far more dangerous than a crowd surfer. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know what you mean. I've never crowdsurfed but have had massive kicks in the head from them. I still wouldn't ban them though, sometimes you get inconvenienced by other people having fun, might aswell just enjoy yourself instead of moaning about everything.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some crowd surfers are evil, but most of them are quite benevolent and are just having their way of fun. It's expected down the front of gigs and if you don't like it or get kicked in the head or anything then move backwards or sideways?

To the people who have been kicked in the head by a crowd surfer, unfortunately its quite hard to control whether you glide over someones head or accidently kick them. If you get kicked, then its fair play to shove or hit the surfer i guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

another Marmite thread! Cool!

Those that have been hurt by surfers are bound to have a different view to those that do it or not been hurt. I don't really like cats due to being bitten by one when I was younger but I am not sure I would ban them. I don't think cats should be brought to a festival though so I am not sure where I am going with this......

I have never done it and can see that if you had waited for hours with your partner and kids to watch a fav band only for some tw@t to bounce off your youngest's head and take his teeth out that you would be more than a little p'd off. But then you probably wouldn;t be at the front with your family during Prodigy or some such band where the mosh pit is definitely not for the squeamish.

I fall in the live and let live camp. I would not go to the front unless I was prepared for a little rough and tumble but then again would be mighty aggreived if some d1ck decided it was fun to rip my ear off - in which case he can expect a little back - quid pro quo. The argument "why did you punch me in the kidney's man - I was only surfing" does not really wash does it?

As I say I have never done it but from afar it looks good when done right and for the right band.

On the anti-social thing - an act is anti-social if the people around you do not enjoy it or find it frightening/offensive so surfers just need to pick their moments!

(Imagine having your ear ripped off by a surfer and then being caught by a warm pint of urine - another anti-social thread - how much would that sting?) :rolleyes:

Edited by whatmidlifecrisis?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing is, it's different from flags, or green chairs, or talking or whatever. Lots of people put up with that despite really not liking it. There's a debate to be had there: would the majority of the crowd prefer not to have them if given the choice.

But crowd surfing requires the co-operation of the majority of the crowd. Cause without it you fall flat on your face. It needs people to hold you up. If you don't like it then cover your head and let them fall. If the majority of the crowd does that, no-one gets anywhere, no-one crowd surfs, QED.

I don't like it much, honestly if someone could be sure to a reasonable level that no-one would get hurt doing it then I wouldn't mind. But as someone pointed out earlier, it's pretty hard to be sure when tumbling over a bunch of people that you won't kick one in the head. It's more likely to happen than not. As such, I really don't see why any normal person would do it. In any other situation if I walked around kicking people in the head 'cause it was a laugh I'd get arrested. But as I say, the majority won't mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, people should lighten up and let the crowdsurfers enjoy themselves.

On a related note, what is it with the fascist killjoys who would deny me the simple pleasure of wandering up to strangers and kicking them as hard as I can in the shins, simply because it's fun? What right do they have? It's a festival!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, people should lighten up and let the crowdsurfers enjoy themselves.

On a related note, what is it with the fascist killjoys who would deny me the simple pleasure of wandering up to strangers and kicking them as hard as I can in the shins, simply because it's fun? What right do they have? It's a festival!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at a Late of the Pier gig in Leeds last year when one of the band was dragged in to the crowd and forcebly surfed. He got back to the stage, and they stopped the gig, at which point the crowd booed them.

Crowd surfing ruined that gig.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...