Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Emily Eavis interview


Guest mandypants

Recommended Posts

Except that they didn't and The Glade was absolutely rammed with people waiting for 'The London Dust Explosion' and 'The Drunk Soul Brother'

Stopped Lost Vagueness from getting too full though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 252
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

With three of us, all with different tastes, having mystery guests is just a pain in the a*se as we'll have to have a "debate" about who to see all over again! With everyone having tickets, and them being effectively sold out, what's the point in having "surprises" - instead of being able to amble to the appropriate stage it seems a scrum is more likely. Apart from that, the fact that whoever it is is not on the Pyramid Stage indicates that there's probably rather more hype than content anyway. Silly idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I THINK it will be Libertines.

I HOPE it will be someone much bigger.

I PRAY to the God of music that it will be Rage Against the Machine. Bit of a long shot though.

Edited by joshwarrr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Radiohead might be a possibility actually...

It sounds ludicrous but remember Michael Eavis was quoted a few weeks ago saying something along the lines of getting phone call's from Radiohead's manager asking about things.

As ivan would probably say, It would please the Radiohead nerds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Double bluff anybody?

I fully expect this "massive" band to be the Libertines, On the Friday

Think about it logically, what did she say? "Health and Safety risks", "info is never gonna get out", "for the lucky fans who are there".

Now with all this speculation about the Saturday half the site are gonna turn up at The Park, creating the problem Emily alluded to, unless the massive band (Libertines, hey I'm no fan but ppl love them) have already put a cheeky spot in elsewhere.

Personally I think the Queens Head is better for them, means Q (and NME) can don't have to leave the safety of their own tent to brown nose some Crack head.

Long story short, there should be a "massive" band playing, but it could be on any stage any time, might not even be billed as special guests, otherwise Emily has contradicted herself by hyping up the "secret" spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Double bluff anybody?

I fully expect this "massive" band to be the Libertines, On the Friday

Think about it logically, what did she say? "Health and Safety risks", "info is never gonna get out", "for the lucky fans who are there".

Now with all this speculation about the Saturday half the site are gonna turn up at The Park, creating the problem Emily alluded to, unless the massive band (Libertines, hey I'm no fan but ppl love them) have already put a cheeky spot in elsewhere.

Personally I think the Queens Head is better for them, means Q (and NME) can don't have to leave the safety of their own tent to brown nose some Crack head.

Long story short, there should be a "massive" band playing, but it could be on any stage any time, might not even be billed as special guests, otherwise Emily has contradicted herself by hyping up the "secret" spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

people seem to have missed this post from lywco

In 2007 there was a big rummour the libs were playing the leftfield....

all the evidence pointed to it.....

just like it does now....

turned out to be hard-fi :)

Edited by Vacant0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

im not a fan of the 'secret' gig. if you won't do me the dignity of announcing yourselves in plenty of time, then do not expect me to walk accross the site on the off chance it's someone i like! i had my fingers burned last year: went to the Park to see Dizzee and on walked Franz Ferdinand. it gave me a chance to get the beer in i suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...