Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2023/24


charlierc

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Ryan1984 said:

Nice. Where did you see it’s on iPlayer?

I can’t make it to the Midlands on Sunday so trying to find a stream. 5,000 Shots fans going up there!

its listed on this page saying iplayer

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrLD1UWlJhlyBcaUj93Bwx.;_ylu=Y29sbwMEcG9zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1704526998/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.bbc.co.uk%2fsport%2ffootball%2f67658830/RK=2/RS=5lEiSV.6ou4Ww_a.HO2kUO_6pYE-

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/5/2024 at 11:42 PM, Neil said:

Just noticed that it's not listed on that page now so maybe the broadcast has been pulled. Will check at two o'clock 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

It’s not going well at all.

Would've been nice to see another one joining Maidstone (and Eastleigh given they're getting a replay against Newport) in keeping the non-league flag flying in the Cup. But that can happen.

Least it's not 7-0 like the thrashing WBA gave Gateshead a few years back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, charlierc said:

Would've been nice to see another one joining Maidstone (and Eastleigh given they're getting a replay against Newport) in keeping the non-league flag flying in the Cup. But that can happen.

Least it's not 7-0 like the thrashing WBA gave Gateshead a few years back.

Shots fans are delighted with a goal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

Shots fans are delighted with a goal!

I'm delighted with them outsinging the baggies fans.

All about the playoffs now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, thetime said:

Arteta is blagging it at arsenal.

The question tbf is where exactly do they go from here. Though the lack of depth they have does seem to keep biting them on the arse. It's also all well and good saying spend big money on a new striker but those weren't cheap in the summer, let alone January when everything is way pricier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, charlierc said:

The question tbf is where exactly do they go from here. Though the lack of depth they have does seem to keep biting them on the arse. It's also all well and good saying spend big money on a new striker but those weren't cheap in the summer, let alone January when everything is way pricier.

The lack of depth? Where? You could argue that point on every club other than city, perhaps Chelsea but that's another story. 

Arsenal has spent over  £700 million in 5 years. 

 

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, thetime said:

The lack of depth? Where? You could argue that point on every club other than city, perhaps Chelsea but that's another story. 

Arsenal has spent over  £700 million in 5 years. 

 

Saka-Jesus-Martinelli is a decent front trio but I'm not 100% convinced the back-up options to that three are to the same level. I like Trossard but Nketiah doesn't seem to have developed as much as people were expecting, while Smith-Rowe seems to have stalled following an injury and Arteta's stubbornness in not rotating.

£700million really doesn't get you the same kind of game-changers it used to. At the very least spending that kind of money to try the same failed "Havertz as a false 9" thing Chelsea did for years isn't exactly progress, even if it's better than their comically awful first half to the season in the lockdown season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Saka-Jesus-Martinelli is a decent front trio but I'm not 100% convinced the back-up options to that three are to the same level. I like Trossard but Nketiah doesn't seem to have developed as much as people were expecting, while Smith-Rowe seems to have stalled following an injury and Arteta's stubbornness in not rotating.

£700million really doesn't get you the same kind of game-changers it used to. At the very least spending that kind of money to try the same failed "Havertz as a false 9" thing Chelsea did for years isn't exactly progress, even if it's better than their comically awful first half to the season in the lockdown season.

Personally think they have the best squad depth other than city. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/7/2024 at 6:53 PM, Ryan1984 said:

FA Trophy next week!

Is that between the cup and the vase? I was ball boy for a vase semi final featuring Farnborough at cherry wood road in about 1980. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Neil said:

Is that between the cup and the vase? I was ball boy for a vase semi final featuring Farnborough at cherry wood road in about 1980. 

Yeah, it’s the National League plus NL North and South I believe. Final is now a double header at Wembley with the Vase as well!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Gnomicide said:

The Arsenal team couldn't collectively hit a barn door yesterday (again), yet the BBC Sport page is carrying an article on Nunez's big misses. A pretty lazy narrative, all told.

Given he had a personal xG of nearly 2 against Newcastle but failed to score, indicating he missed a lot of chances, that kind of thing probably doesn't help. Although granted Newcastle's defence gave up an xG of over 7 in that game, so there were plenty of chances, plus against Arsenal, he looked very effective when moved into an LW role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, charlierc said:

Because Everton weren't already irate about the first points deduction handed down last autumn

cos Everton deserve to be wacked again while city and Chelsea walk free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...