Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, steviewevie said:

At least we didn't pay for it


Rather we did. The alternative is that somebody else paid for it in expectation of a quid pro quo. A little tax cut here, a government contract there, an honour maybe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Nobody Interesting said:

I note how you dropped the 'private jet' part as that does not fit with your mantra.

On a personal note, next week I fly, returning in Feb after passing my parts of my overseas work.

Then I do not plan to fly again.

I've saved loads of emissions by refusing to fly for work. It's no good making nice noises without actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

So...this red sea thing could push prices up, so inflation up, interest rates up...yay!


LNG stockpiles v high in Europe tho because of mild winter so far. Will be some effects on import export goods from/to the East but probably low impact on aggregate supply, all things being equal. Expect the rate of inflation to continue to fall medium term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Nobody Interesting said:

Which is one reason I have taken actions.

Do you eat meat?
Do you use anything with lots of batteries?

I'm not a fluff head with nothing interesting to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Skip997 said:

This

Vote Green FFS

If you want to stop the Tories ruining the country then the only place to maybe vote Greens would be Brighton otherwise you end up splitting the left vote and allow the Tories back in.

Vote for the party best placed to get rid of the Tories at the next general election. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ozanne said:

If you want to stop the Tories ruining the country then the only place to maybe vote Greens would be Brighton otherwise you end up splitting the left vote and allow the Tories back in.

Vote for the party best placed to get rid of the Tories at the next general election. 

I guess vote tactically. When I said I wouldn't vote Lib Dems yesterday, I would if I was in a Tory-Lib dem marginal. If in super safe labour/tory/libdem I guess it doesn't matter....so I could vote Green, but I will vote Labour because I ❤️ Starmer.

(plus, I would imagine a lot of Green party policies would be watered down dramatically if they were ever near power, same as Reform, same as Lib Dem i.e. tuition fees, and like Greens in Germany to some extent)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nobody Interesting said:

So as usual you ask questions and if they are not answered keep wanting answers but when questions are asked of you you go immediately to the insults.

I should expect nothing different from you as there has been nothing different from you on this site since I first joined under another user name (changed due to lost email) in 2013.

Enjoy thinking you not flying makes everything fine and others who do are at fault whilst living the rest of your life in denial that you are very much right wing in most aspects.

i don't think it makes everything fine, i think its me choosing to not deliberately f**k the planet.

 

3 minutes ago, Nobody Interesting said:

 



Ta ta

your trolling me was you going straight for the insults.

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nobody Interesting said:
30 minutes ago, Neil said:

I'm not a fluff head with nothing interesting to say.

So as usual you ask questions and if they are not answered keep wanting answers but when questions are asked of you you go immediately to the insults.

I should expect nothing different from you as there has been nothing different from you on this site since I first joined under another user name (changed due to lost email) in 2013.

i'm so horrid you couldn't keep away and  you joined twice even after you knew i was horrid!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

I guess vote tactically. When I said I wouldn't vote Lib Dems yesterday, I would if I was in a Tory-Lib dem marginal. If in super safe labour/tory/libdem I guess it doesn't matter....so I could vote Green, but I will vote Labour because I ❤️ Starmer.

(plus, I would imagine a lot of Green party policies would be watered down dramatically if they were ever near power, same as Reform, same as Lib Dem i.e. tuition fees, and like Greens in Germany to some extent)

I am lucky that I can vote Labour in my area but yeah vote tactically to get the Tories out otherwise (if you want them out that is).

Voting Green is a risk in any other area as it risks the Tories being allowed back in and the country still being ruined as they are doing now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a war hawk professional journalist bought and paid for by the liberal establishment. Sources? Nah, I’ll just do a bit of conspiracy theory and say reportedly and everyone will believe me.

And then when some leftist twitter pleb provides actual sources,I’ll tell you that they are conspiracy theorists and antisemites and you will all believe me again.

Edited by mattiloy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mattiloy said:

I am a war hawk professional journalist bought and paid for by the liberal establishment. Sources? Nah, I’ll just do a bit of conspiracy theory and say reportedly and everyone will believe me.

And then when some leftist twitter pleb provides actual sources,I’ll tell you that they are conspiracy theorists and antisemites and you will all believe me again.

eh? you're just doing the same if something doesn't fit your world view. The article is from an academic who specialises in that area. No where does it condone Israeli action or condone/condemn anything, it is from her knowledge of Houthis..

I mean, Hamas attacked Israel in a well planned operation. They took hostages and carried out all sorts of atrocities. That wasn't just out of desperation, they wanted a response..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I am lucky that I can vote Labour in my area but yeah vote tactically to get the Tories out otherwise (if you want them out that is).

Voting Green is a risk in any other area as it risks the Tories being allowed back in and the country still being ruined as they are doing now.

Its all kicking off in the stoke reddit. With tory enablers saying starmer will be no change from the Tories 

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

eh? you're just doing the same if something doesn't fit your world view. The article is from an academic who specialises in that area. No where does it condone Israeli action or condone/condemn anything, it is from her knowledge of Houthis..

I mean, Hamas attacked Israel in a well planned operation. They took hostages and carried out all sorts of atrocities. That wasn't just out of desperation, they wanted a response..


I didnt click so exsqueeze me for saying journo. Academic then - writing for a right wing foundation (a swedish one no less).

Always follow the money. The first one is Claire Coutinho but i chopped her name off.

There were some tory lords too.

IMG_1226.jpeg

IMG_1227.jpeg

Edited by mattiloy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mattiloy said:


I didnt click so exsqueeze me for saying journo. Academic then - writing for a right wing foundation (a swedish one no less).

Always follow the money. The first one is Claire Coutinho but i chopped her name off.

There were some tory lords too.

IMG_1226.jpeg

IMG_1227.jpeg

thought you might be away doing some digging.

cba to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which bit is the conspiracy? that in Yemen there is a proxy war going on between Saudi and Iran? That Iran also funds Hamas or Iran can coordinate the groups it funds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

thought you might be away doing some digging.

cba to be honest.

 

’The right wing bloc needs to form a govt with SD (the swedish far right party founded by ex SS members)’

’the most important thing is that Sweden gets a right wing govt and so one needs to be pragmatic’


Always worth doing a bit of digging when you read some sensational claim justified by a mere ’reportedly’.

Its not hard and you’ll usually find that the writer is funded by some shady right wing organisation or other.

IMG_1228.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Ah, well. Never mind, hey.
    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...