Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

Just now, The Nal said:

Giggs has no business managing Man Utd. Just as Red Nev has no business managing Valencia. Just because they were the class of 92 and played under Fergie doesn't mean they can walk into their first managerial jobs against the best players around. They have to learn their trade. Like everyone else.

Like Dalglish did? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

19 minutes ago, zahidf said:

same guy said a week before that potch (spurs manager) was going to be the new manager☺

 

i think they are talking to jose, but i reckon now 4th place is realisitically out of sight, theyd let giggs run things till summer and then let jose in. i doubt he would want to take over the team in its current state!

How about champions league entry by winning the Europa league? I would say that is a tournament Man Utd have a realistic chance of winning and they may think a manager change makes that more likely.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
3 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

Bony played instead of Aguero in those two games - Sterling's role was no different. 

except of course Bony doesn't score goals and Ageuro does, so there's need to get other players closer to goal when Bony is on the pitch.

Which, I suspect, is something of what happened (I can't remember to say  either way).

 

Quote

He's good enough for a mid table side. Maybe Liverpool would like him? 

Too good for WHU then. :P

However good Sterling is or isn't, he's not looking short of anything around the rest of the Man City team, tho perhaps that's because they've dropped off their game a little compared to recent years.

(and before you come back and say "it's Sterling who's dropped them a level", he might be responsible for some of that, but definitely not all of it - all of City's big performers have taken their own dips this year).

And he looked too good for Liverpool, for how they'd been playing at the point he wanted to move on.

So he's definitely better than only good enough for a mid-table side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, The Nal said:

Giggs has no business managing Man Utd. Just as Red Nev has no business managing Valencia. Just because they were the class of 92 and played under Fergie doesn't mean they can walk into their first managerial jobs against the best players around. They have to learn their trade. Like everyone else.

I read Butt is running the academy as well now!  I agree in theory about the idea of learning the trade, however its easy to get typecast as a championship level or mid table premiership manager.  Whether its fair or not the only realistic way for a top ex player to get a top managerial job is if they are already at the club in some capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

europa is pretty difficult to win. man utd shouldnt hold out on that, i very much doubt they would be able to win it. some good teams in that

fa cup maybe if they avoid the good teams till late on.

giggs managed before when moyes was sacked. he would keep most the fanbase happyish and can get experience for when he (and fergie) wants to take over as full manager. he wouldnt be under massive pressure, and he may keep morale with the players up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

except of course Bony doesn't score goals

Bony has scored 31 premier league goals. 

Too good for WHU then. :P

Have you had a look at the league table recently? 

However good Sterling is or isn't, he's not looking short of anything around the rest of the Man City team, tho perhaps that's because they've dropped off their game a little compared to recent years.

He's looked shit. 

(and before you come back and say "it's Sterling who's dropped them a level", he might be responsible for some of that, but definitely not all of it - all of City's big performers have taken their own dips this year).

Agreed - other players (including Toure have been shit too.

And he looked too good for Liverpool, for how they'd been playing at the point he wanted to move on.

With Lovren, Mignolet et al that's hardly tough...

So he's definitely better than only good enough for a mid-table side.

Opinions are like arseholes....I'll agree to disagree 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, zahidf said:

europa is pretty difficult to win. man utd shouldnt hold out on that, i very much doubt they would be able to win it. some good teams in that

fa cup maybe if they avoid the good teams till late on.

giggs managed before when moyes was sacked. he would keep most the fanbase happyish and can get experience for when he (and fergie) wants to take over as full manager. he wouldnt be under massive pressure, and he may keep morale with the players up.

The Europa league is a cup tournament when anything can happen and Man Utd already have a pretty kind draw.  While they shouldnt mortgage the house on winning the thing, its probably a more realistic route to the champions league than overhauling 4th place.  There are good teams in the tournament most seasons, yet looking at some of the teams that have competed in the finals in recent years eg Dnipro you dont have to be great to get to the finals.  Some of the clubs left  wont prioritize the tournament, I dont think theres a team left that Man Utd should fear, neither should those teams left fear Man Utd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

I read Butt is running the academy as well now!  I agree in theory about the idea of learning the trade, however its easy to get typecast as a championship level or mid table premiership manager.  Whether its fair or not the only realistic way for a top ex player to get a top managerial job is if they are already at the club in some capacity.

Yep agree entirely. Coaching the under age teams and the B teams first like Zidane, Mourinho, Pep, Ancelotti etc. Learning how to be the leader, not just shadowing the leader and taking training. Big difference between a trainer and a manager. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

his scoring for Man City is just a tiny bit better than Sterling's. :lol:

So if Sterling isn't scoring enough goals as a winger, how the fuck does Bony class as a goalscorer? :P

Ok, ignoring the fact you're now moving goalposts, what has either of their scoring rates got to do with Sterling being shit? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

If Sterling is shit, so is Bony, and are 98% of the players in the Prem. :rolleyes:

I see you're suffering from brain fade again today. 

If Bony doesn't score goals, 98% of the players in the Prem don't score goals :rolleyes:

I can be a prick too...

As I said, I'll agree to disagree with your opinion on Sterling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I'm saying he's not out of his depth, you're saying he's shit.

One of us is wrong. :D

I said he's looked shit - in a response to a comment you made about him playing for City this season.

This season, playing for City, he has looked both shit and out of his depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
5 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

I said he's looked shit - in a response to a comment you made about him playing for City this season.

This season, playing for City, he has looked both shit and out of his depth. 

Pelligrini doesn't seem to think so, Sterling's been a regular.

But anyway, what happened to your "agree to disagree"? I just did that too, but you seem to have disagreed to agree to disagree. :P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Pelligrini doesn't seem to think so, Sterling's been a regular.

But anyway, what happened to your "agree to disagree"? I just did that too, but you seem to have disagreed to agree to disagree. :P

 

Pellegrini has taken the best squad in the league to a current position of 4th...

i do agree to disagree, I don't agree to letting you twist things to wriggle out of being wrong ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
7 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

Pellegrini has taken the best squad in the league to a current position of 4th...

and Moaniho took the Prem champions to the bottom of the league, and LvG has trashed Utd while spending stupid money.

City may or may not have the best squad in the league, but there's much more about their current position than (just) Pellegrini being shit or (just) Sterling dragging them down.

And you think WHU play with a better style this season. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

City may or may not have the best squad in the league, but there's much more about their current position than (just) Pellegrini being shit or (just) Sterling dragging them down.

Agreed. Do you have a point or is this just a distraction from your inability to see that Sterling has been poor this season? 

And you think WHU play with a better style this season. :lol:

They do. We're playing much more attractive stuff on the eye and sit 7th. I'm still being careful what I wish for...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 minute ago, TheGayTent said:

Agreed. Do you have a point or is this just a distraction from your inability to see that Sterling has been poor this season? 

As I've already said hye's had a lesser influence on City than he was having at Liverpool :rolleyes: ... but he's playing with better players in a better team and being used in a different way. Only a fool would expect exactly the same big influence from him.

3 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

They do. We're playing much more attractive stuff on the eye and sit 7th. I'm still being careful what I wish for...

Then I can only say I must have only watched the games where they've been shit. :)

The results are something different to their style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Ah, well. Never mind, hey.
    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...