Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, ThomThomDrum said:

Shame about the Arsenal result. I hope Leicester don't respond poorly to this and drop off. 

Twas interesting seeing Sturidge, Couthino and Firminio playing with each other for the first time, even if it was Villa....

i think 3 points from away games against aresenal and man city is good overall. though drinkwater may get a red card after the fact for that unpubished dangerous tackle against ramsey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

Thoughts about Sterling this season? He was a player regularly discusses in here when at Liverpool, but very little since.

 I have found him pretty disappointing. Doesn't look the same player as a couple of years ago. However still young and may take a season to adapt, next season will be big for him.

he's being played in quite a different way for City, so he's had far less of an impact because of it, and is looking quite average as a result. There's definitely more he's able to give as his time at Liverpool showed, but whether that's appropriate to do in a team of better player is another thing.

That penalty against him yesterday was ridiculous.

-------------

But in better news for Villa, unlike a lot of people in the country, they at least got fucked on Valentines Day. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

PS: just looked at Sterling's stats.

He's got 5 goals from 22 appearances this year (if wiki is right) - which doesn't stack up badly against his last two Liverpool seasons (9 from 33, and 7 from 35) given how he's playing a role that's much less about getting into the box

So while he's not setting the world alight, I don't think anyone can really point the finger at him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

So while he's not setting the world alight, I don't think anyone can really point the finger at him.

City have been fairly poor. As bad as Utd have been, and they've been completely shit, City are only 6 points ahead.

On that note - Inter lost again at the weekend so are struggling to make the CL spots. Could be Mancini out and Mourinho in. Leaving Utd holding their dicks again. Because LVG is done. Dead duck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
5 minutes ago, The Nal said:

City have been fairly poor.

I can't disagree with that, but you can't hold Sterling responsible for it more than you could hold Ageuro, or Silva, or Yaya, etc, etc. None of them seem to be playing at the sorts of levels we know they can.

And Sterling is the new guy, and clearly being used in a very different way to what he was doing at Liverpool. He seems to have been pretty much told to be available on the edge of the box as much as he can, rather than making runs from further back.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, The Nal said:

City have been fairly poor. As bad as Utd have been, and they've been completely shit, City are only 6 points ahead.

On that note - Inter lost again at the weekend so are struggling to make the CL spots. Could be Mancini out and Mourinho in. Leaving Utd holding their dicks again. Because LVG is done. Dead duck.

  De Bruyne is a huge miss in my book, the one signings that clicked immediately when he signed in last summers transfer window.

Can't see Mourinho going to inter. Juve gave the rest a big head start this season in a bit of a transitional season and will still probably win the league comfortably. What could he achieve at inter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

PS: just looked at Sterling's stats.

He's got 5 goals from 22 appearances this year (if wiki is right) - which doesn't stack up badly against his last two Liverpool seasons (9 from 33, and 7 from 35) given how he's playing a role that's much less about getting into the box

So while he's not setting the world alight, I don't think anyone can really point the finger at him.

I disagree people should be pointing a finger because his performance haven't been good enough, of course that doesn't mean he is on his own or the worst ofender. I think a modern day footballer has to be more adaptable than just perform in one position. You look at De Bruyne and he could do a job anywhere .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

 What could he achieve at inter. 

The same thing Utd are looking to do. Rebuild a team, change the playing style, get back in the CL places, challenge for the league etc. 

Where else can he go if Utd don't nab him? Barca, Bayern, Madrid, City, Chelsea all out. PSG?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
19 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

I think a modern day footballer has to be more adaptable than just perform in one position. You look at De Bruyne and he could do a job anywhere

while you might well be right about De Bruyne, that's more the exception than the rule.

Sterling could either be someone who can't adapt, or someone who will take some time to adapt. And he's now in a team where almost everyone is an established big name, and he's just the jonny-come-lately new kid, and while he's got an arrogant public persona via the press from his want of a move, he's supposedly nothing like that as a person.

So while he might come up short, I'd also say not much more than half a season played is a bit early to call it too.

Personally I don't think he'll come up short - I suspect over the long term his signing at a big price will look entirely justified for City, even if not a bargain. Just look at the sort of players Utd have chucked £50M-ish at, and the lower level that Liverpool have paid £30M-ish for. Sterling at £50M certainly stands up against those, even if he looks less good value against De Bryne.

Which probably ends up getting to mean De Bryne was under-priced, all things considered.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Nal said:

The same thing Utd are looking to do. Rebuild a team, change the playing style, get back in the CL places, challenge for the league etc. 

Where else can he go if Utd don't nab him? Barca, Bayern, Madrid, City, Chelsea all out. PSG?

The difference is recent history shows different teams eg Leicester, Liverpool and spurs can challenge for the title after being miles away the season before. I don't see the same in Italy, one team is just too far ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
42 minutes ago, TheGayTent said:

Sterling has scored in three Premier League games this season from twenty two appearances. His goals have come against Watford, Bournemouth, and Sunderland. 

and in two of those matches Aguero didn't play, and Sterling presumably played a slightly different (more forwards) role which probably isn't an irrelevance.

Different roles in a different team, innit? :)

I've already said he's not gone great, but I think it's reasonable to recognise that  he's being asked to do something different to what he was doing at Liverpool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

there's rumours in one of today's papers that Moaniho will be installed before the end of the month.

It might be bullshit and so might have been the stories about Moaniho talking to Utd, but I suspect those talks are true, and so it gets hard to see LvG staying in the role until the end of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

there's rumours in one of today's papers that Moaniho will be installed before the end of the month.

It might be bullshit and so might have been the stories about Moaniho talking to Utd, but I suspect those talks are true, and so it gets hard to see LvG staying in the role until the end of the season.

same guy said a week before that potch (spurs manager) was going to be the new manager☺

 

i think they are talking to jose, but i reckon now 4th place is realisitically out of sight, theyd let giggs run things till summer and then let jose in. i doubt he would want to take over the team in its current state!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, zahidf said:

i think they are talking to jose, but i reckon now 4th place is realisitically out of sight, theyd let giggs run things till summer and then let jose in. i doubt he would want to take over the team in its current state!

I'd prefer if he came in now. Has the rest of the season to make a plan on who to ship, sign etc. If its in the summer he'll "get a pass" for next season. 

Mourinho could help keep De Gea. Otherwise hes gone in June. And you couldn't blame him at all.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
4 minutes ago, zahidf said:

same guy said a week before that potch (spurs manager) was going to be the new manager☺

I wasn't aware of that, but sports writers have pages to fill every day, so they have to write something.

 

4 minutes ago, zahidf said:

i think they are talking to jose, but i reckon now 4th place is realisitically out of sight, theyd let giggs run things till summer and then let jose in. i doubt he would want to take over the team in its current state!

I'd thought he took over mid-season this time with Chelsea, but I thought 'I'd better check that' and just found out he didn't. So perhaps you're right.

I defo can't see LvG keeping on tho, everything seems to be melting down around him, and he seems to be melting too.

And while Giggs would be the obvious stand-in, I can't see how or why that's good for giggs or why he'd want to do that no-win thing. Even if he proved himself the world's best manager in that time he wouldn't be in the job next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

and in two of those matches Aguero didn't play, and Sterling presumably played a slightly different (more forwards) role which probably isn't an irrelevance.

Different roles in a different team, innit? :)

I've already said he's not gone great, but I think it's reasonable to recognise that  he's being asked to do something different to what he was doing at Liverpool.

Bony played instead of Aguero in those two games - Sterling's role was no different. 

He's good enough for a mid table side. Maybe Liverpool would like him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 minute ago, The Nal said:

I'd prefer if he came in now. Has the rest of the season to make a plan on who to ship, sign etc. If its in the summer he'll "get a pass" for next season. 

and that might be why he'd prefer to wait until the summer, I guess.

After all, getting them in the mix next season looks a hard task from where things are right now.

Remember,  he's no longer Mr Perfect. He took Chelsea to the bottom of the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

And while Giggs would be the obvious stand-in, I can't see how or why that's good for giggs or why he'd want to do that no-win thing. Even if he proved himself the world's best manager in that time he wouldn't be in the job next season.

Giggs has no business managing Man Utd. Just as Red Nev has no business managing Valencia. Just because they were the class of 92 and played under Fergie doesn't mean they can walk into their first managerial jobs against the best players around. They have to learn their trade. Like everyone else.

Remember,  he's no longer Mr Perfect. He took Chelsea to the bottom of the league.

Absolutely but half a shite season in an otherwise fairly incredible 15 years. Wouldn't write him off for that. 

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...