Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

WWE


lharris92

Recommended Posts

You do all know that Reigns is gonna go over to big at mania and when Rollins cashes in he will become the biggest babyface

I think it would be better for Rollins to lose when he cashes in. He has played the heel role well and call me old fashioned but I like to see the heel with egg on their face. Losing the title shot when the odds are stacked in your favour seems the perfect way to do that to me.

I think he has a good future, but don't see the need to rush people to be world champion. For all the potential he doesn't have a huge amount of big ppv wins or feuds that scream world champion to me. I would personally give it at least 12 months to build him up a little more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Lesnar's off. A Rollins cash in and a good feud with Reigns would be a good way to help Reigns into the main event, as he'd get more time with a live mic ( since he can't realistically be expected to improve with the time he's had ), and more time in long matches against someone who can go in the ring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Lesnar's off. A Rollins cash in and a good feud with Reigns would be a good way to help Reigns into the main event, as he'd get more time with a live mic ( since he can't realistically be expected to improve with the time he's had ), and more time in long matches against someone who can go in the ring.

I just cant see wwe going down the Rollins v Reigns route as neither are what I would call established main eventers. I suspect when Reigns wins at wrestlemania he will be feuding with someone with a bit more of a main event pedigree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would be better for Rollins to lose when he cashes in. He has played the heel role well and call me old fashioned but I like to see the heel with egg on their face. Losing the title shot when the odds are stacked in your favour seems the perfect way to do that to me.

I think he has a good future, but don't see the need to rush people to be world champion. For all the potential he doesn't have a huge amount of big ppv wins or feuds that scream world champion to me. I would personally give it at least 12 months to build him up a little more.

It's that mentality of only established main eventers should main event that has led to the constant Cena show in WWE, Rollins had main evented a few times now and did it very well plus he has more experience in them than Reigns but with nudie pics out you may get your wish and may keep him low key for awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see a straight Reigns beats Lesnar, Rollins cashes in on Reigns finale. Most good Wrestlemanias usually have big shocks of sorts. Austin turning heel, Taker losing, Hogan losing clean to Warrior, Mike Tyson etc. Especially if they don't have a match that can carry the event like HBK/Taker or something. The dull ones don't have those moments of course. Rock vs Cena for example.

I'm liking Reigns at the moment and looking forward to a heel turn.

Theres no date for Sheamus' return is there? He could run in at any moment and become a heel in 5 seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah how many of them heels are legitimate threats in the upper card? Wyatt? Sheamus could get on more run as champ? The faces outweigh the heels by far.

EDIT: They just can't turn Rollins face yet.

How many people on the roster altogether are legit on upper card though? I wouldn't even count Lesnar since he's a part timer despite being the champ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye, there's a distinct lack of proper main eventers in WWE at the moment. Face or heel. So saying it about heels doesn't really wash with me.

After mania you have Orton, Cena, Reigns and Bryan all legit face main eventers.

Unless one turns obviously, can see Bryan being heel at extreme rules

Edited by GodlikeYeezus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd maybe have bought that before, but WWE DO see Bryan as a midcarder. So that's where he'll be soon. It's where he'd be NOW had they not decided to give him the spots he's got right now.

Come on the focus is gonna be heavily around the title after mania so anyone whos not competing for that will be the 'upper midcard'. I think the extreme rules card could be very interesting, I heard from someone that WWE plans to increase Sheamus's merchandise by a huge amount but i'm not so sure about how reliable that info is. I'm excited to see the picture post-mania more than the road to it.

Edited by GodlikeYeezus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come on the focus is gonna be heavily around the title after mania so anyone whos not competing for that will be the 'upper midcard'. I think the extreme rules card could be very interesting, I heard from someone that WWE plans to increase Sheamus's merchandise by a huge amount but i'm not so sure about how reliable that info is. I'm excited to see the picture post-mania more than the road to it.

Then that will be at most 3 people then and that's if the MITB isn't cashed in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's that mentality of only established main eventers should main event that has led to the constant Cena show in WWE, Rollins had main evented a few times now and did it very well plus he has more experience in them than Reigns but with nudie pics out you may get your wish and may keep him low key for awhile.

Im not saying that only established main eventer should main event, Im saying that non established main eventers should work with established main eventers to help get them established. If they went with Reigns V Rollins as main event ost wrestlemania and it wasnt well recieved, the careers of both could be negatively impacted.

I think Im in the minority that I like both Reigns and Rollins. However while one has won money in the bank and the other the royal rumble. Neither have held the secondary titles or picked up many big wins on ppv against established stars. I think in 12 months I could buy both better in the main event and the one who waits longest (likely Rollins) will benefit in the long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seth Rollins' push isn't getting derailed even in the slightest btw, so nobody should be factoring that into anything.

As for Reigns and Rollins being negatively impacted, if they get a good chance with a feud and it doesn't work out, then that's their problem. Ideally, Reigns would work with HHH post-Mania, without the title, and Rollins would work with Cena, someone who knows that big match thing, and who Rollins can learn from even more than he already has. Both guys would benefit from that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then that will be at most 3 people then and that's if the MITB isn't cashed in.

So if Cena isn't involved in the 'title picture' he's just a 'upper midcard'. Like i said before come on this upper midcard is non existent.

Anyone else loving the work being done by Cesaro and Kidd? Would love to see them feud with eachother around Summerslam time and get a good amount amount of TV time to work a intense feud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seth Rollins' push isn't getting derailed even in the slightest btw, so nobody should be factoring that into anything.

As for Reigns and Rollins being negatively impacted, if they get a good chance with a feud and it doesn't work out, then that's their problem. Ideally, Reigns would work with HHH post-Mania, without the title, and Rollins would work with Cena, someone who knows that big match thing, and who Rollins can learn from even more than he already has. Both guys would benefit from that.

I agree with the first part but your view on post mania is ridiculous. I'd prefer to see Reigns v Rusev with Rollins constantly trying to cash in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...