Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

WWE


lharris92

Recommended Posts

What a fantastic piece of tv the end of the Taker/Lesnar match was. I remember Warrior beating Hogan but this was bigger. Thats the most unique crowd reaction Ive ever heard in any event anywhere.

Apparently Takers been wanting to do it for a few years. He looks like hes done. He got injured early in the match which didnt help. Thats a couple of manias now hes ended up in an ambulance. The shot of him, HHH and HBK two years ago at the top of the ramp was his goodbye really.

Brock has just signed a new contract bringing him up to WM31. So a Bryan feud is inevitable.

Which is my issue with Bryan. Lesnar losing to Bryan is the WWE jumping the shark. And thats saying something for a company that had an 80 year old woman give birth to a hand on live tv before.

Cesaro gets the big push then. Wyatt and particularly Reigns have a bit to go yet seemingly.

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, NOW I'd have a problem with Bryan going over Lesnar. Because surely Bryan would be the next port of call? If they were going to use ending the streak to put Daniel Bryan over, they should have simply just used it to put him over directly. Not by proxy.

That's assuming that Daniel Bryan is next though, and I'd say he probably is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yep - should have been the Stones.
    • Yeah I do agree on the 2 hour thing. But if they were subbed by Biffy/WA only doing 75 mins or so would be doable.   Only reason I suggested them was because we know they're back doing shows here next year. 
    • Its probably the culmination of issues that have been simmering under the surface for a while. Spain ran a regularisation program recently that allows undocumented individuals to obtain temporary legal status and then a route to EU citizenship. 1.2 million applied. At the same time Montenegro is having to close its citizenship via investment program as part of EU ascension talks.    Countries are obviously asking, why are we having to reject investors whilst others can wave anyone in?
    • I'm not sure, they aren't giving any headliner in that format 2hours and Foos would have at least 2. I wouldn't say Reading is likely for them next year either. If they are as said going big on a tour with stadiums and festivals then the UK is once place they can definitely do stadiums and that would rule them out. And that's even if they come back for a second UK stint as I fully expect them in Europe from very early. That could be seen as hyperthetical but there are is some places I cannot see them not doing from history.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...