Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Jessie J


Guest andymk

Recommended Posts

2003 era Sugababes were one of the best pop acts this country's ever seen, and I'm not even taking the piss.

Good god they were awful though, same with Macy Gray who was on either before or after. I still hate my wife for wasting those 2 hours of my life, I really wish I done something (anything else). Even a few lengths of the long drops would have been preferable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 720
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin

She seems to be down with the kids so would be a good booking for that reason.

oh, the mums and teenage girls love her. But they loved Westlife too, and they've yet to appear on a festival stage. But Jessie has. Fuck knows why.

Come the revolution Jessie J should be first against the wall. I'll be happy to pull the trigger myself. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh, the mums and teenage girls love her. But they loved Westlife too, and they've yet to appear on a festival stage. But Jessie has. Fuck knows why.

Come the revolution Jessie J should be first against the wall. I'll be happy to pull the trigger myself. tongue.png

That is harsh talk brother, even in jest She is what she is.

You want to shoot a young lady who wrote something as pure, simple and sweet as this?

If you surround yourself with negative people You'll never feel settled in or become an equal, no They'll suppress you of your spirit and rinse you dry of smiles So reach deep and release your inner child
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the is she isn't she credible argument I really don't think she is and it all comes down to how she's marketed. Her music and her brand are aimed at kids and we all know kids have terrible taste in music (I include myself in this, the first single I bought was Steam by East 17). Therefore music aimed at kids is invariably shite. Whether someone rights their own songs or not is essentially irrelevant. It's all down to who it's aimed at. If its for kids it's rubbish. Katherine Jenkins doesn't right her own songs but she's seen as a credible artist. She's also much more do able than Jessie J. Jessie J just looks like you'll be straight down the doctors for some cream after you've had a go on her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the is she isn't she credible argument I really don't think she is and it all comes down to how she's marketed. Her music and her brand are aimed at kids and we all know kids have terrible taste in music (I include myself in this, the first single I bought was Steam by East 17). Therefore music aimed at kids is invariably shite. Whether someone rights their own songs or not is essentially irrelevant. It's all down to who it's aimed at. If its for kids it's rubbish. Katherine Jenkins doesn't right her own songs but she's seen as a credible artist. She's also much more do able than Jessie J. Jessie J just looks like you'll be straight down the doctors for some cream after you've had a go on her.

Erm, she's really not. If opera's your thing (I like it a bit but one of my best mates is a professional singer and my Dad loves it) then she is absolutley seen as the Jessie J of the genre. She's all about marketing and celebrity not quality of performance and interesting repertoire.

The credible / not credible argument is really simple.

1) Were you famous before you had actually done anything? If so you're not credible.

2) Have you ever had a significant part to play in a reality TV show? If so, you're not even a credible human being, let alone musician, singer or performer.

If, like Jessie, you can answer yes to both of those questions then I'm prepared to hold you against the wall while Neil takes aim!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a whole boat load of non credible artists who can answer no to both of your points so that makes no sense.

Regarding Katherine Jenkins I honestly have no idea how she's seen in opera circles, I was just trying to make a point, I could have said Pavarotti but he wasn't as fit as my Kath so I used her instead.

Anyway I think we're both essentially making the same arguments so I'm going to stop here and go back to thinking about pantomime horses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree (proper Opera snobs get a bit sniffy about Pav too - in the way that indie types can end up turning their noses up at Oasis because they've sold a few records) but nevertheless, my criteria provides a starting point for weeding out the rubbish!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hannah Vasanth and Jessie J, they make music together, I am not deranged. They makes me smile, that is all.

One mans smile is another mans grimace of sheer revulsion.

For the crimes you are committing against your ears when you put on your headphones and play this noise you should be tried in The Hague, sentenced, and then hung by the neck until dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jessie J live in Jakarta March 2012. In the world's most populous Islamic nation, she is not wearing much, but having spent quite a bit of time there, I can vouch for the fact that the weather is very hot, and the sensible way to go is swimwear.

Edited by bamber
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sound in this one keeps limiting out when the bass kicks in which is a shame, however it is still well worth a watch. This is the tour last night in Singapore and Jessie's confidence and personality shine brightly throughout.

Edited by bamber
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yep - should have been the Stones.
    • Yeah I do agree on the 2 hour thing. But if they were subbed by Biffy/WA only doing 75 mins or so would be doable.   Only reason I suggested them was because we know they're back doing shows here next year. 
    • Its probably the culmination of issues that have been simmering under the surface for a while. Spain ran a regularisation program recently that allows undocumented individuals to obtain temporary legal status and then a route to EU citizenship. 1.2 million applied. At the same time Montenegro is having to close its citizenship via investment program as part of EU ascension talks.    Countries are obviously asking, why are we having to reject investors whilst others can wave anyone in?
    • I'm not sure, they aren't giving any headliner in that format 2hours and Foos would have at least 2. I wouldn't say Reading is likely for them next year either. If they are as said going big on a tour with stadiums and festivals then the UK is once place they can definitely do stadiums and that would rule them out. And that's even if they come back for a second UK stint as I fully expect them in Europe from very early. That could be seen as hyperthetical but there are is some places I cannot see them not doing from history.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...