Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2010-2011


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    2125

  • ampersand

    1135

  • The Nal

    1089

  • TheGayTent

    766

  • Admin

You've got mud on your face, you big disgrace. No football brain but he's done you for pace. THEO, THEO WALLCOTT

his 'football brain' is improving, just as his play is.

Unlike most modern footballers who are at their best nowadays at around 23 or 24 (as opposed to the 27 or 28 it was in the past), Theo is going to be a late developer because he started playing football at a comparatively old age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tom hicks wins the right to sue hsbc, nesv and former chairman martin broughton

is there any level this pathetic septic wont sink to

just leave them alone you lying tool!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you mean arsenal have more than one song? :O wish they'd bloody show it. and talk about sing when you're winning last night. though i'd rather they not sing at all. that song is f**king dire. and factually incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

tom hicks wins the right to sue hsbc, nesv and former chairman martin broughton

is there any level this pathetic septic wont sink to

just leave them alone you lying tool!!

I've just been trying to find a a full report of that, after hearing it on the radio, and failed.

Has he been grated the right to try to sue NESV as well as RBS (not hsbc, surely? :blink:) and the directors at the time? Cos surely they're not any part of any stitch-up he might think there is.

They're merely a buyer, a buyer who bought in good faith at the price they were asked for. Everything I've read previously said that they were in the clear from any court action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweeping generalisation time-

Worse fans in the land, latte drinking bells to a man, only seems to have happened since they moved into the new stadium

I like that song though, I don't think its actually sung as opposed to just being made up by some internet nerd somewhere mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just been trying to find a a full report of that, after hearing it on the radio, and failed.

Has he been grated the right to try to sue NESV as well as RBS (not hsbc, surely? :blink:) and the directors at the time? Cos surely they're not any part of any stitch-up he might think there is.

They're merely a buyer, a buyer who bought in good faith at the price they were asked for. Everything I've read previously said that they were in the clear from any court action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nah i'm talking about their 'greatest team the world has ever seen'. rinse and repeat. they're a big club. you'd think they'd be able to get their heads together and come up with another couple

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arsenal have improved greatly since last year when they played Barca and Wenger got his tactics right not to adapt there style of play to suit Barcas game.

From someone who generally watches Barcelona every week its so easy to lose it after they score first but Arsenal kept on playing the same way after the goal and all credit to them. Now arsenal need to find the first goal at the Camp Nou.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just been trying to find a a full report of that, after hearing it on the radio, and failed.

Has he been grated the right to try to sue NESV as well as RBS (not hsbc, surely? :blink:) and the directors at the time? Cos surely they're not any part of any stitch-up he might think there is.

They're merely a buyer, a buyer who bought in good faith at the price they were asked for. Everything I've read previously said that they were in the clear from any court action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...